Started By
Message

re: Official Avengers thread

Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:17 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468041 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

Now that is true dedication

i will see it again, but i'm not fricking with these crowds again. i'll wait a bit until they die down

i can't imagine taking the risk of going to see this movie 3 times already with the crowds you know will be there
This post was edited on 5/6/12 at 5:17 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60300 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

i think you're stretching


wut?

I think the setup for the dramatic tension was pretty straight forward.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
468041 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

I think the setup for the dramatic tension was pretty straight forward.

a vague threat of sacrifice is implied in any drama involving direct conflict of persons

it's non-specific and an assumed part of our subconscious
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

i think you're stretching


No he's not. You are trying to force your preconceived notion that the film has to have plotholes out there when there aren't any and no one is buying into it. There were no plotholes. If you didn't like the story, that's fine, but stop trying to say there are plotholes when there were none.
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6680 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

I think the setup for the dramatic tension was pretty straight forward


I never felt as though any Avenger was in any amount of danager through out the entire movie.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60300 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

a vague threat of sacrifice is implied in any drama involving direct conflict of persons


It wasn't vague and it was directed at Tony Stark alone. It was so straightforward I knew there would be a point in the film where stark would have to sacrifice himself when Rogers said it.
Posted by vuvuzela
Oregon
Member since Jun 2010
14663 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:28 pm to
18 pages and 200 million opening weekend....

This movie is amazing!!!
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60300 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

I never felt as though any Avenger was in any amount of danager through out the entire movie.


That's fine. I'm simply stated that Stark was in danger and due to the way that moment was foreshadowed it would be rational to assume he might get stuck in the other dimension.

Just because the viewers know about the "next" Iron Man movie or because the previews gave something away has no bearing on the writing of the movie itself.
This post was edited on 5/6/12 at 5:31 pm
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:32 pm to
quote:


let me ask you all this

how did you react to transformers 3 last summer?


I enjoyed it. Still wish they had someone else in Sam's role and it was a diminished.

Actually, I would have enjoyed it more if Josh Duhamel's character was the lead human rather than Sam. Sam's parents were hilarious though, but he was the biggest drag on the film series. Glad they dropped Leo and Michaela. I don't mind humor in my action movies, but it was very hit or miss in this entire series. Loved the action though. Wish there was more of it, but then again, my new standard for big budget action movies is The Avengers so that's what I'm going to judge pretty much every big budget ($150 mil+) movie on from now own, but I'll be lenient on the movies for this summer. But movies like Pacific Rim and Man of Steel better bring it, because my action standards are high as can be now.

For T3, I'll give it a 8.5-9.0 on the action movie scale. Like I said, the humor was hit or miss, and Sam's character was just a nuance to me at this point. That was a classic example of trying to appease non-action fans with a character's drama and shite but taking away from what the film is meant to be. The franchise is called The Transformers, focus on them, not Sam's Great Alien Robot Adventure. That said, the climatic battle was top notch with a great opening money line.

I'm glad that with T4 they are dropping Sam and his family/love interest and focusing more on the Transformers themselves. If they can bring back Josh Duhamel's character for the continuity factor, I'd be happy with that. But for the love of God use IMAX cameras and give us a bigger image view of the action. I want a better idea of the size and scope of the battles that are taking place. Avatar was great at creating a sense of size and scope. HTTYD brought it to animated films (Megamind was exceptional in this regard) and The Avengers showed you how to make it work for a big action movie. Follow the playbook.
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:35 pm to
quote:


Nah, I've seen both of the Hulk movies. It was a plot hole/poor writing


Then apparently you have a bad memory or bad recall or you are lying because this isn't the first time that Hulk has had moments of clarity. Hell he even took care of a character while Hulked out. It's not a stretch by any means to say that in the mean time he as able to control his anger more and direct his rage while Hulked out, because we've seen him do it before.

Like I said, not a plothole, just your own problem.
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:38 pm to
quote:


then he should have been mad at him a couple hours later for throwing him against a wall


Yeah you didn't watch the movie, because he did respond to this in rather hilarious fashion.

quote:


i'm just curious when he went form irrational hulk to rational hulk, and how that happened



See where you are failing is in your assumption that he was completely irrational in the first place and that he went to completely rational. Several people have tried telling you that's not the case but you are too stupid, too stubborn, and too stuck-up to understand simple logic and reasoning.

You claim to be so smart, yet can't put two and two together without getting 6 and then blaming it on the two and two.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:38 pm to
He didn't just have "a moment of clarity." Bruce Banner had complete or close to complete control in the final fight sequence. Every single time Bruce hulking out is discussed or when it actually happens in this movie it's either blatantly stated/shown or heavily implied that he's a wild, irrational smashing monster with zero self control. They make this painfully obvious. It's not logical to go from that to how he behaves in the final fight sequence with no explanation.
Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:40 pm to

This post has been marked unreadable!

Posted by TheDarkestNight
Member since May 2012
419 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

That's fine. I'm simply stated that Stark was in danger and due to the way that moment was foreshadowed it would be rational to assume he might get stuck in the other dimension.

Just because the viewers know about the "next" Iron Man movie or because the previews gave something away has no bearing on the writing of the movie itself.


And for all we know, he could have been stuck out there. Could have been the intro to his movie. But hey people on here that have no knowledge of the movie or it's backstory are clearly smarter than you and I who actually watched the film and understood and processed what we watched, so why bother with them? They are set in their ignorant, stupid ways, so let them be happy with their ignorant stupid ways.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

No it's not. Jesus Christ you are a mongoloid guy.


This is why you keep getting banned. You can't handle people disagreeing with you even though you make terrible arguments. Also using "mongoloid" makes it pretty obvious who you are.

quote:

You claim to have seen The Incredible Hulk but are so fricking stupid you don't even remember that while he was fighting off the military at the college, Liv Tyler's character walked onto the battlefield, he not only did not attack her, he protected her, and then when she was injured, he took her away and nursed her all while Hulked out.


That is completely different bro. Completely. All it shows is that his love for Tyler's character is present in his hulk state also. It does not show rational behavior and control over his hulked out state.
Posted by WeBleedCrimson
Member since Mar 2008
21993 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53561 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 5:49 pm to
The thing that pissed me off, was they foreshadowed Thor's hammer bringing extra power to IM's suit, but it never came to fruition after the Thor-IM showdown....I was kinda waiting for Thor to stick his hammer into IM's core to bring him back to life and then the Hulk screams, what the frick was that.


And another weak thing was Hawkeye getting brought back to good side by a knock in the head. Really?
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
15968 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

how did you react to transformers 3 last summer?


I saw it on cable a couple of months ago, and to me, it had the same stale jokes & CGI that Bay used in the first Transformers. It just rang hollow for me.

quote:

i'll give you the differentiation in TDK and Avengers. but first class compares, and is a vastly superior film


I absolutely loved First Class, it's in my Top 5 Comic Book Movies of All-Time. But even though it does have humor & incredible CGI, it takes itself more seriously than The Avengers does by tackling heavy dramatic themes of revenge, retribution, genocide, rejection, inadequacy, loss, etc.. that weighs 1st Class down in comparison with a pure popcorn superhero movie like the Avengers that just soars with well-timed fresh humor & action.

When you get on a roller-coaster at a theme park, how often are you hammered with social messages or heavy themes? The Avengers is just a better pure ride.

Posted by CrippleCreek
Member since Apr 2012
2385 posts
Posted on 5/6/12 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

And another weak thing was Hawkeye getting brought back to good side by a knock in the head. Really?



that was pretty damn weak.

That and the Army being a hive mind were both kinda lame.

I did think there was some tension with Iron Man flying into the portal however.

Having 2/4 main good guys being immortal, and a 3rd being fairly close makes it tough to build in really good tension. These guys have insane powers that don't really require teamwork. They just separately beat asses for the most part. Like others have said using either the hammer/shield combo, or the Thor Lightning/Iron Man charge up would have been cool.
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram