Let the Bat Eat the Cat

This is stupid as frick.

There is no legitimate reason to have a scene of Batman going down on Catwoman.

DC’s boomer style leadership won’t even let Batman marry Cartwoman in continuity because they suck arse. This will be a failing effort.

This is actually an interesting question about how you use established characters. Work with me here.

The Harley Quinn show has been a minor hit for DC precisely because it is over the top. Harley's big thing with Batman is does he, or does he not, have sexual relations with bats, for example. Usually phrased a lot more vulgar than that. It works within that narrow styling of the show.

At the same time, Batman is not Kiteman (another break out star of that show). He's a big money character slumming in a smaller market show as a straight man.

Would Marvel be comfortable with Deadpool 5 depicting Captain America as a compulsive masturbator? Probably not. Do we want to see Superman in a graphic sex scene with Lois Lane that proves the old "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" bit that Larry Niven wrote?

And, of course, Batman is an obsessive compulsive when it comes to mastering skills. Does anyone doubt he is absolutely ferocious when it comes to going down on Catwoman? Some things we can take on faith I think.