- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there any movie out now worth seeing
Posted on 10/14/11 at 7:23 pm to NewGuy01
Posted on 10/14/11 at 7:23 pm to NewGuy01
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
2. Taking into account the fact that you are the most popular board's self appointed Christian knight; and that this site is at it's foundation a discussion forum for a sports team located in the bible belt, you have a built in base that desires a service which you perform: that of a content filter.
3. IF your page has the most views, they probably aren't unique views if your post history is any reference. In threads started by you, about 60% of the replies come from you.
I hope that helps answer your question.
quote:
Waiting for Superman A very simplistic movie with one theme and one theme alone: teacher unions are the reasons American public schools are in bad shape. While the point that unions can become an evil in themselves, I have worked in jobs where workers were not allowed to organize together, and the end result was employees were abused. Without labor unions, employees will be taken advantage of. What most American workers take for granted, insurance, protection from wild pay cuts, and a steady schedule with guaranteed hours, those, non-unionized workers usually do not have. The Catholic Church has for centuries been one of the driving forces behind unions because the Church recognizes that the economy exists for the benefit of persons, not persons for the benefit of the economy. This is a fundamental and critical point in understanding the moral argument behind the existence of unions. Where the super wealthy, who are in the super minority, believe that workers exist only to build their profits, i.e., people exist only to render to the economy Having said that, unions benefit the person only when their members respect work. There is an inherent value in their work, but when the work ethic is obliterated, i.e., when the point of life becomes luxury, living for the weekends, and retirement, there is neither respect for persons or for the economy. I do not believe labor unions create a narcissistic, Epicurean worldview. Labor unions function well only in societies that are religiously grounded. I am thinking particularly of 19th and 20th century England. As England became increasingly uprooted in its religious inspiration in the late 20th century, its unions became oppressive, corrupt, and worked against the common good of the nation. While I am not one of those "religious" conservatives who quixotically fights for crumbs like the right of public officials to pray during public ceremonies, I do think a reason our school unions are failing is there is no universal guiding ethic of the good amongst teachers today. They do not see their calling as one from the divine. They do not see knowledge as something sacred. Nor do they see their students as children of a covenant who work to improve and preserve the world as tenders of a creation that is not of our own making. Instead, a nihilism has entered our culture at its mind: our education system. Education is seen only in pragmatic terms: what kind of job can I get if I learn the material? Knowledge is no longer seen as sacred; knowledge is just a ticket to wealth. There are fundamental cultural problems that have laid ruin to the American educational system (yes, we know poor families who do not put value in an education are doing no favors to their children). But I do not believe the splitting of our cultural foundations, which is the reason our schools are broken, is reason enough to get rid of labor unions, as this movie's director concludes. Get rid of teacher labor unions nation-wide and the same problems will exist but the eventual addition of labor abuse. 3/10
LINK
quote:
Drive The Psalmist writes, "I was silent and still; I held my peace to no avail; my distress grew worse, my heart became hot within me. While I mused, the fire burned; then I spoke with my tongue: 'LORD, let me know my end, and what is the measure of my days; let me know how fleeting my life is'" (Psalm 39). The director of Drive uses what can best be described as monastic silence to draw viewers into the character played by Ryan Gosling. The impact is strong, for it is able somewhat to salvage a terrible movie. Although exciting, the first scene played out like a scene from Grand Theft Auto. Sure to please 20 and 30-something ribald males, to whom I'm sure this movie will become an unwarranted cult classic, there's very little to this film other than the silence of Gosling. For Gosling's part, he is masterful. Through facial expressions, we see the most naive, innocent man who ever walked the terra firma. His adorable, childish smile makes us wonder. And in an instant the smile become a devastatingly violent kick to a head. And we wonder. What the hell created the person we see? The director uses a Hitchcockian technique: don't show and let the audience project. Let the audience come up with their own ideas of how this person came to be who he is. While it can stir the imagination, I came out wanting to know more about his childhood, and felt the movie's near complete avoidance of his past came across not so much as a religious mystery, which, by definition we can never know, but more the director and writer's inability to create a suitable and explicable history for a man so, well, mysterious. While the movie is adapted from a book, I think the audience deserved a hint to his past. We end up getting two hints. When Gosling is off-screen, we learn how long he has worked his job and how little he cares about money. The other hint comes from a scene with Gosling. And in that scene, we learn not to prod him regarding his past. If we do, we'll get our teeth kicked in. This character of internal burning can memorize thousands of streets on a map; he is a master at knowing how to get you where you need to go. But he is a mess who knows nothing about the streets of his life's map, primarily because he is afraid to remember his past. As a result, he will never get to where he needs to go. Gosling's character is the only interesting one. And even though he is front and center, the director wasted too much time on the others. The cinematography has a feel of a foreign film and an 80s film. The lighting is well used as a character, reminiscent of Collateral. Keep an eye out for the symbols of wall paper and blood (cf. "My hands are a little dirty...So are mine"). I'm still trying to come up with a satisfying interpretation of the two. The music may be an important key to unlocking the mystery of Gosling's character, but I couldn't understand all the words. But the movie does end with a song about a hero who is an ordinary human being. Besides these strengths, and the intrigue associated with Gosling, the movie's plot is boring, the ending predictable, and the use of violence cloys. 5/10
LINK
quote:
The Debt is good, but for movies based on the Holocaust at the theaters now, Sarah's Key is better.
LINK
quote:
Undeniably The Debt. Contagion might not even deserve the 5/10 I gave it.
2. Taking into account the fact that you are the most popular board's self appointed Christian knight; and that this site is at it's foundation a discussion forum for a sports team located in the bible belt, you have a built in base that desires a service which you perform: that of a content filter.
3. IF your page has the most views, they probably aren't unique views if your post history is any reference. In threads started by you, about 60% of the replies come from you.
I hope that helps answer your question.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 7:25 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
Drive is a 5/10 movie. You're crazy to recommend it.
The fact that you said this and said that the Tree of Life was the best movie ever made tells me never to trust in your opinions, you fool.
Drive is fantastic. Not a chick flick. Moneyball is also very good. I hear great things about Ides of March. If you're in the mood for a silly/action-packed/mystery foreign film (which, granted, is a tough mood to find yourself in) go see Detective Dee and the Mystery of the Phantom Flame. It was pretty fun. Not gonna win any oscars, but enjoyable.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 7:28 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
Why is the TLSU movie thread the most read movie thread in The Arts Board's history then? Surely I am not very funny - even Chicken has said as much.
Isnt pride one of the 7 deadly sins?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:07 pm to NewGuy01
The only things you've ever posted worth reading are quotes from my reviews. South Louisiana is hardly the Bible belt. Learn a little more about the sociology of this region.
There's a difference between being prideful and speaking the truth. I like to think I am guilty only of the second.
There's a difference between being prideful and speaking the truth. I like to think I am guilty only of the second.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 9:11 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:33 pm to TulaneLSU
You bump your own threads once a week and they quickly fall back to page 2 within an hour. This is not something to brag about.
If you are serious about your reviews...perhaps you should seek your audience...wherever they may be.
If you are serious about your reviews...perhaps you should seek your audience...wherever they may be.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:38 pm to Zamoro10
I think the majority is afraid to enter debate with me because the truth of the matter is that thread gets more unique views than any other on this board. So yes, readers seldom respond, but don't mistake their lack of responding with not reading.
Also, I do not bump the TLSU movie reviews thread. I add reviews. There is a great distinction between bumping and adding new content.
Also, I do not bump the TLSU movie reviews thread. I add reviews. There is a great distinction between bumping and adding new content.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:46 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
There's a difference between being prideful and speaking the truth. I like to think I am guilty only of the second.
And we all know how desperately you can cling to "the things you like to think" in light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
I don't think it's an act either. I think your contextual blinders are so self-reinforced at this point as to qualify as an actual psychosomatic condition.
I am somewhat surprised though; to learn that the one subject I might expect you to be a qualified expert in, Christianity in the south, turns out to be just another area where your pseudo-intellectualism falls short again.
(I mean, I realize we're a little south of the geographic center, but still...)
I wouldn't normally point this out, but with your aforementioned utter lack of self awareness, let me state in no uncertain terms. This makes 3 times in one thread your posts have been thoroughly raped by physical evidence.
Now please, as was suggested earlier, go back to being a shitty OT poster. TIA.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:50 pm to NewGuy01
I assume you're not from south Louisiana and have never lived here because south Louisiana has very little in common with the Bible Belt.
If you have something to add on The Arts Board, where are your reviews? Otherwise, you are a clanging cymbal.
If you have something to add on The Arts Board, where are your reviews? Otherwise, you are a clanging cymbal.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 9:54 pm to TulaneLSU
quote:
I assume you're not from south Louisiana and have never lived here because south Louisiana has very little in common with the Bible Belt.
If you have something to add on The Arts Board, where are your reviews? Otherwise, you are a clanging cymbal.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 10:39 pm to NewGuy01
when i was in college me and a couple of friends came up with a tourist slogan for baton rouge.
Baton Rouge: just north of a good time and just south of the baptists.
ETA: if tulane was so popular, why do his late night bible threads end up with fewer POSTS than the monday night raw thread has pages.
Baton Rouge: just north of a good time and just south of the baptists.
ETA: if tulane was so popular, why do his late night bible threads end up with fewer POSTS than the monday night raw thread has pages.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 10:54 pm to jcole4lsu
My movie reviews are popular, which is not necessarily a badge of honor. That's not to say I'm popular. I'm probably one of the least liked posters here, which is something I don't like, but I am opinionated, and I rarely hold back here because this place allows some degree of my creativity to be expressed. I have trouble being as expressive when I write for myself or to those I know in real life. I do not intentionally offend people, but I will not go out of my way not to offend people. I think its my sometimes arrogant, seemingly prideful way of writing, something I confess to a degree, but am not overly apologetic because I feel I have these thoughts that I am compelled to express, that has distanced me from the acceptance of many here. Would I like to be accepted? Yes. But I am not willing to silence my expression in exchange of approval or friendship here.
The success of the LNBST is not linked to my popularity or not. It is a simple errand I am undertaking: to read through the Bible in a year (or less). If others want to share in it, I am pleased. If not, I will not lose sleep. The LNBST is simply that: a Bible study. And I will never view its success in worldly terms, i.e., in the number of people who participate in it.
The success of the LNBST is not linked to my popularity or not. It is a simple errand I am undertaking: to read through the Bible in a year (or less). If others want to share in it, I am pleased. If not, I will not lose sleep. The LNBST is simply that: a Bible study. And I will never view its success in worldly terms, i.e., in the number of people who participate in it.
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 11:36 pm to TulaneLSU
The irony in your posts is so thick I might literally choke on it.
You refute the bible belt claim in blissful ignorance of; or at least complete silence to the fact that your very existence is affirming evidence, not negating.
You then, being completely without counter example to any of my points, you attempt to dismiss me by calling me a "clanging cymbal" because my posting style is not the same as your own. (Emphasis added because it's my personal fav)
And finally we have the most glaring example.
I know I used part of it before, but if you'll just hear me out, it's worth rehashing.
You dropped into a random thread and within three posts you made it completely about you. The world didn't make it about you, some hateful posters didn't do it, you did. You (once again) attacked the validity of another poster's opinion because it wasn't in line with your own. When called out on your bullshite, you immediately call a thread of yours "the most read movie thread in Art Board's history." Seriously. It was your 1st line of defense. When I jumped in, what were your 1st words to me? It's cool, scroll up and look. I'll wait.
LOL right?
A couple other ensuing gems.
"the majority is afraid to enter debate with me because the truth of the matter is that thread gets more unique views than any other on this board"
"the TLSU movie reviews thread. I add reviews."
(Third person, and giving your nickname a nickname? Sigh.)
"My movie reviews are popular"
"some degree of my creativity"
"my sometimes arrogant, seemingly prideful way of writing, something I confess to a degree, but am not overly apologetic"
You like to think the latter huh?
You refute the bible belt claim in blissful ignorance of; or at least complete silence to the fact that your very existence is affirming evidence, not negating.
You then, being completely without counter example to any of my points, you attempt to dismiss me by calling me a "clanging cymbal" because my posting style is not the same as your own. (Emphasis added because it's my personal fav)
And finally we have the most glaring example.
quote:
There's a difference between being prideful and speaking the truth. I like to think I am guilty only of the second.
I know I used part of it before, but if you'll just hear me out, it's worth rehashing.
You dropped into a random thread and within three posts you made it completely about you. The world didn't make it about you, some hateful posters didn't do it, you did. You (once again) attacked the validity of another poster's opinion because it wasn't in line with your own. When called out on your bullshite, you immediately call a thread of yours "the most read movie thread in Art Board's history." Seriously. It was your 1st line of defense. When I jumped in, what were your 1st words to me? It's cool, scroll up and look. I'll wait.
LOL right?
A couple other ensuing gems.
"the majority is afraid to enter debate with me because the truth of the matter is that thread gets more unique views than any other on this board"
"the TLSU movie reviews thread. I add reviews."
(Third person, and giving your nickname a nickname? Sigh.)
"My movie reviews are popular"
"some degree of my creativity"
"my sometimes arrogant, seemingly prideful way of writing, something I confess to a degree, but am not overly apologetic"
You like to think the latter huh?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 11:42 pm to NewGuy01
You do realize the Bible Belt is defined by a particular form of Protestantism brought primarily by a Scot-Irish migration from the Carolinas westward? You also, I hope, understand that the settlement of south Louisiana was primarily split between the French from Nova Scotia and a hodgepodge of French, Spanish, Isleno, and Caribbean settlers (not to mention African slaves), all of whom, except for the animistic slaves, were Roman Catholic.
South Louisiana has, since its earliest European times, been a primarily Catholic region. Because the Bible Belt is defined as being predominantly Protestant, to say that south Louisiana is part of the Bible Belt is absurd.
South Louisiana has, since its earliest European times, been a primarily Catholic region. Because the Bible Belt is defined as being predominantly Protestant, to say that south Louisiana is part of the Bible Belt is absurd.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 11:45 pm to TulaneLSU
Are you the teacher that all the students hate, or are you just weird as a rule?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 11:53 pm to DanglingFury
Dangling Fury, in real life, we would be good friends.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:01 am to TulaneLSU
Stranger things have happened I guess.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:09 am to TulaneLSU
quote:
Why is the TLSU movie thread the most read movie thread in The Arts Board's history then? Surely I am not very funny - even Chicken has said as much.
I'm sure that isn't true.
It would be a better format if you didn't feel the need to claim it and let it be an open review thread.
You tend to dislike movies that others really like, and your kind of crazy-religious with that shite on the OT.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:11 am to TulaneLSU
quote:
You do realize the Bible Belt is defined by a particular form of Protestantism brought primarily by a Scot-Irish migration from the Carolinas westward? You also, I hope, understand that the settlement of south Louisiana was primarily split between the French from Nova Scotia and a hodgepodge of French, Spanish, Isleno, and Caribbean settlers (not to mention African slaves), all of whom, except for the animistic slaves, were Roman Catholic.
South Louisiana has, since its earliest European times, been a primarily Catholic region. Because the Bible Belt is defined as being predominantly Protestant, to say that south Louisiana is part of the Bible Belt is absurd.
I'm aware that in true "TLSU" fashion you've adjusted the scope of your rebuttal.
Yes, I'm aware of the origin of the phrase. I'm also aware of the current meaning, which is the context I was using. While "bible belt" originated as a handle for the Baptist movement, what has come to define the term is not a specified flavor of Christianity so much as a particular religious zeal, typically, though not always associated with conservative political views. I be more than happy to link examples of this translation if you're unaware of them.
Crazy kids and their slang.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:28 am to NewGuy01
There is not one sociologist, historian, or literary figure in America who would classify south Louisiana as part of the Bible Belt.
To quote LSU Press's Companion to Southern Literature (p. 100)
To quote LSU Press's Companion to Southern Literature (p. 100)
quote:
Bible Belt never described the South monolithically, certainly in any strict geographical sense, as the state of Louisiana exemplifies. Southern Louisiana, predominantly Catholic, may be described as outside the Bible Belt; northern Louisiana is in the Bible Belt.
Posted on 10/15/11 at 12:37 am to TulaneLSU
Is that all you've got? After everything that's been said in this thread? I'm asking honestly. Your response to this thread is page 100 of the LSU Press's Companion to Southern Literature? In which the direct quote "Louisiana is in the Bible Belt" can be extracted? Are you feeling ok?
Popular
Back to top


0




