Started By
Message

re: Is it Possible Maester Aemon knew who Jon's real Mother was? (Spoilers maybe)

Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:07 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:07 pm to
It really depends on what the promise or duty was.

If its "Keep Jon safe" then he could tell Benjen.

If its "Don't Tell anyone" I don't think he woudl even tell Benjen.

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

It really depends on what the promise or duty was.

If its "Keep Jon safe" then he could tell Benjen.

If its "Don't Tell anyone" I don't think he woudl even tell Benjen.



I think that Ned can still use common sense in this. Lyanna's main priority was Robert not finding out, or any high lord that would harm or try to crown him. Benjen sure as shite wouldn't just sit by and accept Ned's bullshite answers he gave Robert. Robert was an idiot and would take Ned's word for it. Gerold Hightower and Arthur Dayne being there with Lyanna dying is highly suspicious, and that wouldn't have gone unnoticed by Benjen. Benjen is owed an explanation on what happened to his sister. Catelyn isn't, especially due to the fact that Ned didn't know her at all from the start and what a count she was to Jon.

I think it's highly possible that Jon Arryn may have figured it out, but didn't say anything knowing that Ned would never use Jon to oppose Robert, especially due to the "Dragonspawn" comment. I still have a hard time believing lords like Tywin Lannister and Randyll Tarly wouldn't have thought of this as well. Randyll may have, but I think it's clear Tywin didn't.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 10:19 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

but I think it's clear Tywin didn't.


What are you basing that on?

I don't really remember anything about Tywin talking about Jon Snow

I really don't think anyone is really questioning the "honorable man with 1 screw up in his youth angle". I feel like Tywin doesn't believe in perfect honor either.

Also, if you are gonna start a war over a woman, it does make sense that you would want her protected.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 10:21 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

What are you basing that on?



Tywin's reasoning skills. He knew the Lords of the Reach would come fairly peacefully once defeated, and that Dorne could be dealt with in 6 of the 7 Kingdoms forces against them. The three remaining Kingsguard though were the biggest threat to his family once he had the Targaryen children killed and Jaime secured. If Gerold Hightower and Arthur Dayne were with Viserys, this would likely spell disaster for Robert's reign.

Ser Gerold was the head commander of the Forces against the Ninepenny Kings. He could have gained massive support for Viserys title in the Free Cities. Ser Gerold also could additionally secure the Reach's support, and Ser Arthur would have gotten Dorne to his side and the smallfolk at large against Robert. Robert's Rebellion was not a rebellion against the Targaryens, but against Aerys himself. Viserys didn't stand a chance at getting these forces on his own, but with those Kingsguard, he would get an incredibly formidable army to challenge Robert's reign and possibly wipe out him and the Lannisters.

Now when Ned just happens to find them with a very small force for whatever reason, they're guarding Lyanna Stark, Ned kills them, and then Ned then goes to Starfall and Ashara kills herself, Tywin should have taken notice. It's not Ned being honorable that's the big red flag. The big red flag is why were the Kingsguard protecting Lyanna Stark and not Viserys. Once Rhaegar is dead, they should have left their post if Lyanna isn't pregnant with Rhaegar's heir. Tywin knew these people well, and I think he should have known this.

quote:

Also, if you are gonna start a war over a woman, it does make sense that you would want her protected.



Not over the King himself. The only reason they were there was to protect the King. They at least should have been in route to protect Viserys if Lyanna wasn't pregnant.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 10:39 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

Not over the King himself. The only reason they were there was to protect the King. They at least should have been in route to protect Viserys if Lyanna wasn't pregnant.


Makes no sense.

They were there instead of protecting 1) the reigning king 2) the Crown Prince 3) Rhaegar's children from his first marriage including a male heir who would trump Jon.

AT BEST Jon would be the child of a polygamous marriage. Polygamy isn't recognized by the 7 and while Targaryens did it anyway, people wouldn't rally behind the kid until he was the last possible option. He could have also just been a bastard.

Visery's would still have a stronger claim.

They were there because Rhaegar loved Lyanna and tasked them to protect her and the child. 3 kings guards compared to a fricking war isn't that big a deal, clearly Rhaegar was willing to go to bat for this chick.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

Makes no sense.

They were there instead of protecting 1) the reigning king 2) the Crown Prince 3) Rhaegar's children from his first marriage including a male heir who would trump Jon.


But this was still Rhaegar's child they were protecting. The Kingsguard is sworn to protect the King's Bloodline above all else. Lyanna is not of that bloodline. Protecting the King's true family is literally their only duty, and thus they would have abandoned her regardless of Rhaegar's commands if she wasn't pregnant.

quote:

AT BEST Jon would be the child of a polygamous marriage. Polygamy isn't recognized by the 7 and while Targaryens did it anyway, people wouldn't rally behind the kid until he was the last possible option. He could have also just been a bastard.

Visery's would still have a stronger claim.



No he wouldn't. The Targaryens have done this before. Rhaegar's legitimate children still have rights over Viserys.

Plus Rhaegar was obsessed with the prophesy of a dragon having 3 heads. He made that clear. Lyanna is not the third head, it is her son. Rhaegar made it clear to the Kingsguard that Jon was the Prince who was Promised, I'm almost certain of it. Maybe Tywin didn't know this little part.

quote:

They were there because Rhaegar loved Lyanna and tasked them to protect her and the child. 3 kings guards compared to a fricking war isn't that big a deal, clearly Rhaegar was willing to go to bat for this chick.



They are morally obligated to abandon their post if there is a King in need of their service. Tywin should know this. Once Rhaegar and certainly Aerys is dead, and Viserys has no guardian, it's their literal duty to abandon what they are doing to go serve the new king.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 11:34 pm
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:27 pm to
I think y'all are misinterpreting what it meant when they say Ned wasn't close with Lyanna. He had spent damn near his entire life in the Vale with Robert and Jon Arryn up until Robert's war. He went to the Vale around 8 yrs old. And Robert's rebellion started around the time they were 18-19. So he spent almost all his formidable years in the Vale. But that doesn't mean he wasn't close to or didn't share the love he had for Robert and Jon with his entire family.

This isn't to say that he was at the Vale the entire time. I'm sure he was at WF some, as well. He likely just didn't know the ins and outs of Brandon, Lyanna, or Benjen's life as well as they did with each other.

The only time he was in WF for good was after Robert had won his rebellion with Jon fricking Targaryen in his arms.
This post was edited on 6/24/16 at 11:30 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

I think y'all are misinterpreting what it meant when they say Ned wasn't close with Lyanna. He had spent damn near his entire life in the Vale with Robert and Jon Arryn up until Robert's war. He went to the Vale around 8 yrs old. And Robert's rebellion started around the time they were 18-19. So he spent almost all his formidable years in the Vale. But that doesn't mean he wasn't close to or didn't share the love he had for Robert and Jon with his entire family.



I know they both loved each other, but I don't think Ned was all that keen on Lyanna's tomboyishness and thought she needed to be more of a proper lady. She needed to behave honorably for her house. Brandon and Benjen didn't care about that. She loved him just as much as her other brothers, but I don't think she trusted Ned fully in that he put his own honor over everything else.

I think for his bias againt Lyanna while she was living is why Arya is truly Ned's favored child. He was hell bent on not repeating the same mistake with her and wanted her to live the life she saw fit.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

But this was still Rhaegar's child they were protecting. The Kingsguard is sworn to protect the King's Bloodline. Lyanna is not of that bloodline.


They are sworn to protect the kings bloodline, but they didn't protect the King the Crown prince of the Crown Prince's first born child. If that was their duty shouldn't they have gone to king's landing after the battle if the Trident?

quote:

No he wouldn't. The Targaryens have done this before. Rhaegar's legitimate children still have rights over Viserys.

Plus Rhaegar was obsessed with the prophesy of a dragon having 3 heads. He made that clear. Lyanna is not the third head, it is her son. Rhaegar made it clear to the Kingsguard that Jon was the Prince who was Promised, I'm almost certain of it. Maybe Tywin didn't know this little part.


So how could Tywin be suspicious of there being a child. The Kingsguards were crazy loyal to Rhaegar. They loved him. Look at how Selmy talks about him. They woudl have listened to Rhaegar.

quote:

They are morally obligated to abandon their post if there is a King in need of their service.


Yet, they were at the tower of joy instead of protecting the King, The Crown Prince, or the Grown Prince's eldest son. They were there because Rhaegar asked them to be. their duty would have had them at King's Landing.

Plus the point is, why didn't Tywin figure it out, and it is perfectly logical that Rhaegar woudl task his 3 trusted friends and Kingsguards with protecting the woman he cared enough about to start a war.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

They are morally obligated to abandon their post if there is a King in need of their service.


Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/24/16 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

They are sworn to protect the kings bloodline, but they didn't protect the King the Crown prince of the Crown Prince's first born child. If that was their duty shouldn't they have gone to king's landing after the battle if the Trident?



It doesn't matter what order they are in. So long as they are over the king's bloodline, they are sworn to protect them and obey orders from them. The Crown Prince commanded they stay there to protect his child. They received no further commands from Aerys. Rhaegar also had protection in Barristan Selmy, Lewyn Martell, and Jonothor Darry, and Aerys had Jaime protecting him. They were not obligated to move their posts until Aerys was slaughtered by their own brother. Once they heard of that, they should have immediately gone to Viserys' side, unless of course Lyanna is pregnant.

quote:

So how could Tywin be suspicious of there being a child. The Kingsguards were crazy loyal to Rhaegar. They loved him. Look at how Selmy talks about him. They woudl have listened to Rhaegar.



He also knows they were obsessed with their vows and they were the single greatest Kingsguard in Westerosi history. They would have either taken Lyanna along with them to Viserys or abandoned her somewhere along the way. They wouldn't have waited around at a tower unless Lyanna was carrying and couldn't go anywhere else rationally.

quote:

Yet, they were at the tower of joy instead of protecting the King, The Crown Prince, or the Grown Prince's eldest son. They were there because Rhaegar asked them to be. their duty would have had them at King's Landing.


All these people had Kingsguard protection at the time though. Kingsguard vows aren't as damning as Night's Watch's vows. They are given time off to go home and bond with their family, as Jaime and Lewyn have shown.

quote:

Plus the point is, why didn't Tywin figure it out, and it is perfectly logical that Rhaegar woudl task his 3 trusted friends and Kingsguards with protecting the woman he cared enough about to start a war.



My point is Tywin would know that they would immediately stop all orders from Rhaegar and Aerys in order to protect King Viserys as soon as they knew Aerys was dead. It's in their vows, and they take those vows very seriously.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 12:13 am to
You are just making up rules and bylaws to support your opinion.

Either the Kingsuard puts their oath to protect the king over everything, or they take orders from the Crown Prince. After the Trident, when every kingsgaurd but Jamie was either wounded or killed, they should have abandoned Lyanna to protect the king and the heir (Aegon) in kings landing.

Even if he was legitimate, until Aegon died, Jon woudln't have had any more of a claim to the Throne than Viserys (Both being the younger brother of the heir apparent)

So either they decided that being at the Tower of Joy to protect a non-heir was more important, or they decided their loyalty to the Prince was More important.

If they went there after Kings Landing was sacked, then that makes sense, btu they sat out the Trident AND the Sack to be there, and that Clearly is a breach of their oath unless their loyalty to Rhaegar superseded.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 12:24 am to
quote:

Either the Kingsuard puts their oath to protect the king over everything, or they take orders from the Crown Prince. After the Trident, when every kingsgaurd but Jamie was either wounded or killed, they should have abandoned Lyanna to protect the king and the heir (Aegon) in kings landing


No. Their king is still alive and they have a brother to protect him. They should not have abandoned their post over Rhaegar's death.

quote:

Even if he was legitimate, until Aegon died, Jon woudln't have had any more of a claim to the Throne than Viserys (Both being the younger brother of the heir apparent)



He's still a member of the royal family though.

quote:

So either they decided that being at the Tower of Joy to protect a non-heir was more important, or they decided their loyalty to the Prince was More important.



They received no further orders from Aerys though.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79446 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 1:17 am to
quote:


No. Their king is still alive and they have a brother to protect him. They should not have abandoned their post over Rhaegar's death.


Still alive, with no army and 1 Kingsguard. But 3 of them stayed to protect a nonheir.
quote:

He's still a member of the royal family though.


But not an heir. They left Visery's with no Kingsguard at all, and they left The King and Royal Heir with 1 Kingsguard between them.

Either they were too dumb to do their job, or they weren't doing it for some reason.

They put their love of Rhaegar first, AND this is all besides the point that Tywin would have figured out there was a baby there. Like I said the whole world believed that they were there because Rhaegar ordered it.

given the length Rhaegar went through for Lyanna that is believable, and that is why they were there. Aerys didn't order it, and If they really cared about their oath they woudl have gone to king's landing.

Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
44412 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 1:45 am to
Why you write would like that?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95668 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 5:57 am to
quote:

AT BEST Jon would be the child of a polygamous marriage.


It's difficult to discern the readers from the watchers in this thread, but let's break the full theory down from a significance standpoint.

Jon's bloodline is important - NOT because of any hereditary claim to the Iron Throne or leading the Targaryen dynasty. The details are uncertain, but Rhaegar became obsessed with the prophecy of Azor Ahai and TPTWP. Also, the Dragon has 3 heads. There were arrangements already in place to get Viserys and Dany across and I believe Rhaegar was involved with those.

But Jon was the key piece and he wasn't born yet. He had to be protected. Lyanna was a secondary concern as was his own personal safety, the safety of the king, etc. Rhaegar thought he was fighting the war for the future. Maybe he was right.
This post was edited on 6/25/16 at 6:03 am
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 6:46 am to
quote:

Also, the Dragon has 3 heads. There were arrangements already in place to get Viserys and Dany across and I believe Rhaegar was involved with those.


Except, one of the three heads Rhaegar was thinking of is dead now. You can thank a certain Khal for that.

So who is the third head gonna be? Tyrion? Lots of theories surrounding his real father. Young Griff/Aegon? Doubt we ever see him in the show. Varys? God I really hope not.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116180 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 7:10 am to
quote:

nd did he know about the prophecy or not?


he knew about the prophecy

quote:

And did he believe that Jon is TPTWP.


He believed Dany was TPTWP. He starts spouting off a lot of regrets of not being wiht dany on his death bed. If he knew Jons parentage then I think it wouldve come out during his ending days
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 7:12 am to
Can we just have one thread for this stupid arse show instead of 35 different who is a better sword fighter or who is a Bastard threads every day
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116180 posts
Posted on 6/25/16 at 7:22 am to
quote:

this stupid arse show


bitch please
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram