re: Dan Schneider out at Nickelodeon

You definitely aren’t throwing shite at a wall but you are coming off as if you are speaking facts. Like I mentioned, I’m on your side in this but as of now no accusations have came out to truly bring justice. Nick ending his contract doesn’t do anything for me because they haven’t said they ended his contract due to sexual misconduct.

quote:

---

I know pretty much for a fact that Jennifer Lawrence was sexually abused by Weinstein, and she has denied it.

---

Just curious, but how in the world would you be privy to this information?

quote:

---

Just curious, but how in the world would you be privy to this information?

---

That’s how OML posts. He does it in every thread he has an interest in. Often hyperbolic statements that he read on another forum or website

quote:

---

Which I doubt they will because then people will question why he was kept around if all that was true.

---

Yeah. Unlike Harvey who didn't answer to anyone, Dan Schneider had overhead. If it's as extensive as rumored, Viacom itself is in a complete world of shite and pretty much fricked. Here was Himmmm (either RDJ or some other big Hollywood insider) in January talking about the producer (Schneider) and his protector, which he hopes to bring them both down soon since the Protector is elderly and wants him to pay before he dies: Long

quote:

---

The earth now quaking beneath the feet of the corporation/studio/network, the Protector...and definitely the Producer. Several of the victims have begun to talk to lawyers who smell blood in the water. The big Executive fall guy? He passed away. They wanted to blame it all on him, since he's dead and can't defend himself. Only two big problems: 1. In a major corporate shuffle in the past year or two, several executives/board members got pushed out and they want revenge badly against the corporation and against the Protector. 2. One of the biggest victims of the Producer has a LOT of proof against him. Irrefutable proof that can bring the whole house down on them all.

The movie studio owned by the corporation is not doing well, and many in the industry have been reluctant to set up projects there because they're not sure if they'll ever get made. Meanwhile, the corporations networks are also falling into trouble. So even if everything behind the scenes were fine? It would still be a tough time there. So if a major scandal were to hit the offices, studio lots, and networks? It would trigger a domino effect that will send shareholders running and talent fleeing.

Because, you see #TimesUp is not just a movement, meme, or hashtag. It's literally a thing. Because time IS up for intimidation and silence of those victims. One is no longer a girl, and is now a woman. She's explored criminal charges, jurisdictions, statutes of limitations and exceptions to those. She's livid at her parents for their complicity, and wants revenge AND a bigger payday through a lawsuit for the career and life that was stolen from her - but only AFTER she makes it all public. So the time is up on the agreement her parents made, which doesn't apply to her now - as an adult. She lawyered up and they've hired investigators, forensic accountants, analysts, and a security outfit of global repute who has even worked for government intelligence operations. She's very serious about this - as are the other victims who endured similar abuse and complicity from parents, guardians, and managers. Several have engaged the services of the same law firm who employ experts in the field of crimes against children with the feds.

---

I am curious what the irrefutable evidence is, and one major rumored asset may come to the limelight and really bring Viacom down: Jamie Lynn Spears' child. Dan and Viacom are totally fricked if she issues a paternity test to Schneider. Really no need for a trial if he refuses.

Granted you risk fricking with the kid depriving him of a normal life, so that's the problem with this scenario, but perhaps the child could save other's from a similar fate of his mother.

quote:

---

Her child looks nothing like Dan and indeed looks like the supposed father Casey Aldridge, same eyes and all.

---

I'm not confident whose kid it is, but she and Casey are. This is hypothetical, but if she issues a paternity test, Viacom is completely fricked.

quote:

---

but if she issues a paternity test

---

How do you know she didn’t?

quote:

---

Which I doubt they will because then people will question why he was kept around if all that was true.

---

This combined with a series of under the table settlements is what I think is happening. No way they want it getting out that the "beloved" children's network has had a fricking predator in a very high position for years.

But that's also why I think he'll never be fully exposed. The best I can hope for is that without his network of child sex delivered to his door, he'll get his fix through other means and be busted. I'm not holding my breath, though.

quote:

---

Because Ronan Farrow has balls of steel and knew if he took the biggest fish out that the dominos would fall from there, including damaging his own piece of shite father

---

Frank Sinatra?

quote:

---

But if she did to Schneider, he's automatically guilty of statutory rape if not worse if he agreed to do it.

---

No he's not. He most likely is a predator, but he could submit to a paternity test to clear his name. It's merely evidence that he is not the father of the baby, it is not evidence that he had sex with her