Started By
Message

re: Amazon Prime Studios is under fire for shortening the classic Christmas film

Posted on 12/27/24 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Trauma14
Member since Aug 2010
6480 posts
Posted on 12/27/24 at 10:56 am to
quote:

The point, I assume, is why have an abridged version.
The abridged version was made in the 70s for tv purposes


It's probably some directive to provide as many version of a movie as possible so we, the consumer, can have a choice. The dude who added it to the library probably didn't even know what was cut from the movie.

It does suck though. If someone has never seen the movie before and that is the one they watched, it would ruin their first experience.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 12/28/24 at 3:58 am to
quote:


You culture warriors have meltdowns about the most inconsequential shite. You were probably hyperventilating while you typed that

Its hilarious that by pointing out that Amazon didn't create this abridged version, the culture warriors say you are "defending' it.

I just don't understand how someone could hate truth.

Being informed of truth isn't a slight, reading bs headlines and believing them isnt a good way to live your life.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram