Started By
Message

re: $200 Million ‘Joker’ Sequel Is a Box Office Bust - Update in OP, lower than expected $37M

Posted on 10/8/24 at 6:18 pm to
Posted by 0jersey
Paradise
Member since Sep 2006
1933 posts
Posted on 10/8/24 at 6:18 pm to
So my buddy loved the first one and asked me to check it out with him last Sunday. I went into the movie blind.

Going into movies blind can be fun, but also risky.

I cannot think of a worse movie I have seen in my life in the theater. It was flat out stupid, boring, and as all the other posts I have read have stated, completely took a dump on the audience of the first movie.

You wanna review? Here’s some spoilers- Cigarette smoking in almost every single scene sprinkled in with god awful songs combined with agonizing pacing. The end.

I wish I had a billion more thumbs so I could give it a billion and two thumbs down. Add in my buddy’s thumbs and call it an even billion and four thumbs down.

DO NOT SEE if you value your time.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
4430 posts
Posted on 10/8/24 at 6:34 pm to
Eh, that could be anything. Phillips cost Warner millions. He's toast. This could be a hit piece by those that he just cost millions.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43133 posts
Posted on 10/9/24 at 9:01 am to
Todd saying now that Arthur Fleck was never the Joker?

Why name your fricking movie that then you dipshit? Man this guy is a total assclown and as I assumed, so far up his own arse. What a douche. Hope he never gets to direct a movie again.
This post was edited on 10/9/24 at 9:02 am
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
162909 posts
Posted on 10/9/24 at 9:43 am to
quote:

. I'm sure they assumed this movie would be a big money maker for them

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram