Started By
Message

re: Will parity ever return to college football?

Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:40 pm to
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13337 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

It doesn't matter how many scholarships you give or don't give a school, if a generational head coach is at a power school like Alabama or Ohio State they will continue to win at a similar level.


I don't think Saban would start losing a bunch, but I think he couldn't stash nearly as many 5 and 4 star players that would be starting on other teams and helping them compete with the big boys. I definitely think there'd be more parity.
Posted by Colonel Angus
Member since Aug 2007
1620 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:40 pm to
Yes. The new transfer rules are going to even things out. That freshman 4 star sitting on the bench at Bama is gonna now be able to transfer to Memphis or Kentucky and ball out immediately and get to the NFL quicker.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13337 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

Right now just sort of feels like the NFL before the salary cap got instituted.


Right.

What I'm suggesting is essentially a salary cap on talent

65 scholarships means coaches have to be that much more picky in who they recruit and leave a lot more meat on the bones for other schools.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13337 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Yes. The new transfer rules are going to even things out. That freshman 4 star sitting on the bench at Bama is gonna now be able to transfer to Memphis or Kentucky and ball out immediately and get to the NFL quicker.


Or the baller at Kentucky will transfer to Bama to win a title and play with better teammates.
Posted by SerenityNow
Chicago
Member since Feb 2008
2418 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:43 pm to
Yeah, I agree. Scholarship limits seems like the rational way to go.
Posted by pigskinGod
Member since Sep 2020
1573 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

People hide behind " tradition " too much though. Fear change. See " Eyes of Texas"


What a loser
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
13337 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:51 pm to
Also I wonder if we limit off-field coaches/analysts/shadow staff if that wouldn't remove some advantages.

I know how valuable they've been at LSU and obviously Alabama is known for theirs. A lot of schools aren't willing/able to build such a massive machine.

Some people might laugh at that, but those guys put in fricking work. They are a really, really big advantage if your opponent doesn't have the same thing going on.

Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62729 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

USC doesn’t give a rats arse about sports anymore.

What are the reasons?
1. Liberal political climate moving away from "aggressive men" focus?

2. OJ Simpson and his murder trial?

3. Increasing influx of Hispanics and Orientals to the area, neither of which are particular fans of American sports?

Posted by Kodar
Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
4558 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 4:19 pm to
Doubtful. Significant system changes would be required, and I'm not even sure what those changes are or if they would even be that effective. Scholly limit reduction may help, but that's an assumption until we see it actually implemented anyway.

There's still the issue of what even defines 'parity' in CFB. In the general sense of parity, CFB has never had parity, period. If you mean at least more than 10 teams have a remote chance, then there's an argument. To argue for parity in a system in which the P5 & G5 is still linked however is purely wishful thinking.

To go on top of that, there's the issue of the post-season being decided by non-objective factors. Even during the BCS, this was an issue, so lets not pretend it's just the committee, although they're a problem in their own right.

Tl;dr CFB sucks as a competitive sport to crown a champ. It has other redeeming qualities.
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 4:20 pm
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 4:24 pm to
Yeah and UCF won it a few years back too huh?
Posted by The Quiet One
Former United States
Member since Oct 2013
11599 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 7:45 pm to
Exactly. Ultimately, you have to ask universities and colleges to agree to surrender their individual power for the “greater good”. Right now, CFB is ruled by Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State, Oklahoma and a handful of others trying to cling to Superman’s cape and occasionally finding crumbs of success. Good luck getting them to give up their cash cows so the BYUs and Georgia Techs and UCFs and Arizonas of the world have a “fair” shot.

Plus, we’d have to dump about 80 FBS teams from the league. Tulsa can go play FCS. Boise can reschedule games with Idaho. There’s just way too many half-assed programs that don’t have the resources, support, facilities or fanbase to justify existing with the major football programs. Again, good luck culling them.

A 60-team league would work and be great. But most FBS programs would get culled to lower level leagues or vanish overnight. That’s a big ask for the sake of improving our entertainment value.

60 teams. 30 teams per conference. 6 teams in each division. Play 5 division opponents, 4 non-divisional conference opponents and 3 cross-conference opponents. 5 division winners advance to playoffs along with non-division winner with best record. 6 playoff teams in each conference. Top 2 get a bye. First Round, Divisional Round, Conference Championship and NCG. The most games played is 16. Most would play 15 or less. Keeps most rivalries and regional matchups in place and offers a completely objective path to a championship.

Do away with scholarship limitations. Best programs who strive to be the best get rewarded. Piddling-assed teams who don’t try hard get creamed. If you want to be in an elite league with the Bamas of the world, get off your arse. Don’t force recruits to settle for attending shitty schools because you want to restrict their access. They can always transfer it they’re not happy.

This would work bigly, but no way it happens.

So, we’ll just expand the playoffs that all these mouth breathers wanted in the first place and we’ll create even more lopsided results. Then we’ll revisit this topic annually and ask the same dumbass questions
Posted by phunkatron
Member since Jun 2019
1444 posts
Posted on 1/13/21 at 8:07 pm to
I used to spend all day every Saturday in the fall watching CFB.

I didn't even bother to tune in on Monday, and it wasn't personal animus against Saban or Bama.

Watching the same teams over and over has eroded my interest, and its going to kill the sport at an accelerated rate if nothing changes.
This post was edited on 1/13/21 at 8:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram