Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Why isn't ufc prime time non ppv tv?

Posted on 6/5/16 at 3:57 am
Posted by iamAG
Member since Aug 2015
3517 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 3:57 am
I know money. It just seems like if it was "free" the brand would grow, the excitement would grow, and other sports make plenty off tv deals that i feel the ufc could simulate. I just don't see how they couldn't work out a tv deal where people wouldn't have to pay to see the fights. I love ufc, but I can't spend money on a fight that might last a minute.
Posted by grape nutz
sesame street
Member since Mar 2006
3942 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 6:12 am to
UFC was better when it was on Spike. Now it's all over the map hard to track down.
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 7:08 am to
quote:

money
Same reason the good boxing match ups aren't free. They've been doing this long enough to know what makes money and what doesn't.
Posted by iamAG
Member since Aug 2015
3517 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 7:15 am to
If your theory is correct, why has the NFL not made prime time games ppv?
Posted by StrongBackWeakMind
Member since May 2014
22650 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 7:16 am to
Because they don't need to. Networks pay the NFL a shitload of money to show their games because they have no trouble selling the air time and know exactly what they are getting in an NFL game. It's not the same for MMA. Sponsors aren't beating down the door to buy air time and you never know WTF is going to happen during an MMA bout.

ETA: As for my "theory", you think UFC is turning down more money from network TV? Seriously? They are a fight promotion. Their goal is to maximize profits. They do what makes the most money. At the moment, that is big fights on PPV and a bunch of free shows on cable.

ETA2:
quote:

I love ufc, but I can't spend money on a fight that might last a minute.
1. You're clearly a casual MMA fan. Not that there is anything wrong with that. I've gone from a hardcore fan to more of a casual fan. But if you love MMA, you'll do whatever it takes to watch the fights.
2. You get 5 fights on a PPV, not one. Add to that the 4 or 5 prelim fights on free tv, you're getting a night full of MMA.
3. This is like saying you love boxing, but wouldn't pay for a Tyson fight because he might destroy his opponent in the first. People love finishes. Well, except for you.
This post was edited on 6/5/16 at 11:15 am
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 8:34 am to
The Kimbo Slice fight did some serious damage to non-ppv hopes.

It just doesn't have insanely broad appeal and a lot of the people that don't watch it think it's barbaric.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17604 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 10:36 am to
quote:

seems like if it was "free" the brand would grow, the excitement would grow, and other sports make plenty off tv deals that i feel the ufc could simulate.


There is enough trash on cable already. I'd rather they keep it PPV and keep the trashy folks poor
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 6/5/16 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Now it's all over the map hard to track down.


it's too hard to go to ufc.com, click on their schedule page, and see the clearly posted dates/time/channels listed?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram