- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't the Bengals cut ties with Shemir Stewart and just sign Hendrickson to a deal?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:19 am to TackySweater
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:19 am to TackySweater
quote:
I mean. You clearly posted two things that you are wrong about lol
One you actually posted the actual thing that makes you wrong.
You can’t make level of wrongness up lol
you're just proving my point.
1
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:20 am to lsufball19
Ok. Maybe go read your quote again and MAYBE you’ll catch your error.
Highly doubtful but hey crazier things have happened lol
Highly doubtful but hey crazier things have happened lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:31 am to TackySweater
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:42 am to lsufball19
Ah yes. A laughing emoji when asked to address why you’re wrong. Classic avoidance lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 11:59 am to TackySweater
What do you want me to say? “No you’re wrong?”
If you are too dense to articulate your arguments and too dense to be able to comprehend what you read, then a laughing emoji is appropriate because it is, in fact, funny. You’re a hopeless and confident moron. You’ve made that abundantly clear throughout this thread. When the dumbest guy in the room thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room, it’s quite pointless to try to reason with him. You have literally argued with licensed professionals in this field. That’s generally about the time most people shut the frick up and concede they may be out of their depth. But you have no intent to actually try to learn anything about the situation.
If you are too dense to articulate your arguments and too dense to be able to comprehend what you read, then a laughing emoji is appropriate because it is, in fact, funny. You’re a hopeless and confident moron. You’ve made that abundantly clear throughout this thread. When the dumbest guy in the room thinks he’s the smartest guy in the room, it’s quite pointless to try to reason with him. You have literally argued with licensed professionals in this field. That’s generally about the time most people shut the frick up and concede they may be out of their depth. But you have no intent to actually try to learn anything about the situation.
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:00 pm to lsufball19
Why even man?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:03 pm to lsufball19
quote:
You have literally argued with licensed professionals in this field.
Didn’t know we had NFL players and owners and agents in the thread lol
quote:
If you are too dense to articulate your arguments
It’s. In. Your. Own. Post.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:03 pm to TT9
quote:
Why even man?
Easy answer. He’s wrong and has no response lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:06 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Didn’t know we had NFL players and owners and agents in the thread lol
You don’t need to be an nfl owner nor an agent to be a professional who deals with contracts. That’s not exclusive to the NFL and/or agents. You know who prepares those contracts? Attorneys.
quote:
It’s. In. Your. Own. Post.
Yes it’s in my own post that his agent stated they want to negotiate the new language and you said he doesn’t want to negotiate.
You also spent days arguing about ambiguous language in a contract. When someone presents a counter point, you don’t explain how or why it doesn’t apply, you just say it doesn’t. Because you’re not smart enough to explain how or why. You’re a dumbass. I’m sorry
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:13 pm to lsufball19
quote:they want the same that’s always been in contracts. That means they don’t want to negotiate anything new. How do you not understand this lol
Yes it’s in my own post that his agent stated they want to negotiate the new language and you said he doesn’t want to negotiate.
quote:
You also spent days arguing about ambiguous language in a contract. When someone presents a counter point, you don’t explain how or why it doesn’t apply,
I’ve done this all week. All of the examples are examples of people doing dumb shite lol
And you’re still avoiding the fact that you were wrong about Richardsona suspension. No surprise there lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:14 pm to TackySweater
You are a complete fricking idiot
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:14 pm to lsufball19
quote:
When someone presents a counter point, you don’t explain how or why it doesn’t apply, you just say it doesn’t. Because you’re not smart enough to explain how or why.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:15 pm to lsupride87
Ad hominem for the win!!!!
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:16 pm to Corinthians420
I’d love some more examples since I’ve shot down every single one so far. What ya got?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:24 pm to TackySweater
quote:
they want the same that’s always been in contracts. That means they don’t want to negotiate anything new. How do you not understand this lol
When presented with a quote that says the opposite, yet you continue to argue they are unwilling to negotiate, it’s pointless to try to convince you otherwise
quote:
I’ve done this all week.
That’s sad
quote:
And you’re still avoiding the fact that you were wrong about Richardsona suspension.
I really wasn’t.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:26 pm to lsupride87
quote:
You are a complete fricking idiot
When mingo and pride are on the same side of an argument you know the person on the other side is probably a moron
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:32 pm to lsufball19
quote:
When presented with a quote that says the opposite, yet you continue to argue they are unwilling to negotiate, it’s pointless to try to convince you otherwise
Ok so they keep saying conflicting things then. That means you might be right you might be wrong. Same for me. Guess we just don’t know.
quote:
really wasn’t.
You said he was suspended for missing whatever he missed. Which is clearly wrong. It’s in your own post lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:43 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
My understanding is he is the first player that is being asked to sign that contract. He is 1 of 1 player. They aren’t asking anyone else on any team to agree to these clauses. He is basically saying “Why am I the first? Why not give me the same contract as every other NFL player
This. No one should sign what they are asking him to sign.
And they are making a big mistake with Hendrickson.
Their ownership and management is terrible. The players and fans deserve better
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:44 pm to TackySweater
quote:
For some reason he and his agent don’t have faith that he can avoid doing something stupid so they don’t want to sign it Don’t know why these players have so much trouble with just shutting their mouth and playing
Ok now just admit you have no idea what you are talking about
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:46 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:
Why not give me the same contract as every other NFL player
So does he want what’s always been done or is he wiling to negotiate?
Page 16 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News