Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

When Borg tried to come back with a wood racquet

Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:29 am
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58644 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:29 am
Ugly. He moved well on the court, didn't look old but that racket. Simply overpowered.

Edit: Damn embed disabled. Here is the Youtube link.

This post was edited on 7/24/26 at 11:57 am
Posted by GrimaceBallz
Member since Nov 2024
921 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 11:39 am to
K
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
39508 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 12:45 pm to
Should have tried it at Wimbledon, he was one of the best on grass.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
22062 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Should have tried it at Wimbledon, he was one of the best on grass.

A baseliner winning Wimbledon five years in a row has to be one of the all time achievements in professional tennis. I mean, Borg is already one of the all time greats, but that is an insane stat.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58644 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 4:52 pm to
Actually winning at Wimbledon and Roland Garros for five years straight at the same time is a bigger feat . That's like winning Charlotte and 24 Hours of Lemans.

Borg was actually better on clay than grass. Won more French Opens and made it to US Open finals when on clay.
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
22062 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 6:11 pm to
I agree, that is what made him so great. . His game was suited for clay, but he dominated Wimbledon like no one before or since, winning 11 total grand slams before he was 26. Insane.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58644 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 7:46 pm to
Tanner was serving at 150 mph when Borg beat him at Wimbledon
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11853 posts
Posted on 7/24/26 at 8:27 pm to
the "Milk and Cookie Swede"

forgot who called him that
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58644 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:53 am to
I don't think the big three would have won so many Grand slams if they hadn't changed the surfaces and the balls. When everybody has to play the same style, it's no wonder only few players seem to win everything
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112220 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:58 am to
The strings are a bigger deal than the balls or courts
Posted by ELVIS U
Member since Feb 2007
11896 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 11:21 am to
Same thing happened to McEnroe, so he changed to a composite racquet.
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3518 posts
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

Should have tried it at Wimbledon, he was one of the best on grass.

One of the greatest dirt ballers of all time. Won 6 times at RG and the Channel Slam three times. Wasn't gonna be the same after 8 years away no matter the surface nor the racquet. I hate that he retired when he did.

He was one of the most graceful movers on a tennis court ever, and especially on clay. One of the first guys I remember sliding. I wanted to be him when I was a kid and would've loved one of those Donnay Borg Pro racquets. I have the pic of him on his knees with that racquet after beating McEnroe at Wimbledon in 1980.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram