- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What do y'all think about this hit?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:13 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:13 pm to TbirdSpur2010
First of all, ReauxlTide's opinion is completely irrelevant until he admits there's head to head contact (he was claiming there was none last night even after seeing the video in the OP) If you aren't willing to admit that then you're clearly too biased to be taken seriously.
Second of all, anyone claiming targeting isn't saying it's dirty. They're saying the flag has been thrown all year so why not then? The dirty part was separate from the targeting.
Size of the defender hasn't mattered all year. Whether or not the offensive player ducked creating the head to head contact hasn't mattered all year. So you cant suddenly say he's twice his size, what's the defender supposed to do. I agree with the thought but you can't suddenly interpret the rule different than it's been interpreted all year.
Second of all, anyone claiming targeting isn't saying it's dirty. They're saying the flag has been thrown all year so why not then? The dirty part was separate from the targeting.
Size of the defender hasn't mattered all year. Whether or not the offensive player ducked creating the head to head contact hasn't mattered all year. So you cant suddenly say he's twice his size, what's the defender supposed to do. I agree with the thought but you can't suddenly interpret the rule different than it's been interpreted all year.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:14 pm to Weagle25
quote:
Size of the defender hasn't mattered all year. Whether or not the offensive player ducked creating the head to head contact hasn't mattered all year. So you cant suddenly say he's twice his size, what's the defender supposed to do. I agree with the thought but you can't suddenly interpret the rule different than it's been interpreted all year.
Bingo. Well said.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:16 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Please, LSU fan, tell me..
What I can tell you is by definition, the play in the OP was roughing the passer.
Perhaps he is not labeled as a dirty player because he isn’t flagged when he commits dirty plays.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:19 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:Q give some #extracurriculars in there at the end.
Unless you're just trolling, you should probably quit giving cute little nicknames to dirty play.
But let's be real. LSU fans calling for an ejection are for real sad.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:20 pm to ReauxlTide222
It's targeting. And targeting is an ejection so yes we are calling for an ejection
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:20 pm to OceanMan
quote:
Perhaps he is not labeled as a dirty player
He is now.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:24 pm to OceanMan
quote:What rule did he break?
What I can tell you is by definition, the play in the OP was roughing the passer.
quote:Holy cow
Perhaps he is not labeled as a dirty player because he isn’t flagged when he commits dirty plays.
The kid is being hyped as a top 3 pick and plays for Alabama and had a quote blow up on him twice this year.
Yet no team found ANY reason to call him dirty this year.
He form tackled a tiny dude and let him feel it at the end.
Y'all wanting this guy ejected is truly sad.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:25 pm to ReauxlTide222
The roughing the passer rule
quote:
Forcibly driving the passer to the ground and landing on him with action that punishes the player.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:26 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
But let's be real. LSU fans calling for an ejection are for real sad.
We saw our best player miss a half of football (against you guys) for less than that.
There've been some overreactions, sure, but I think most just want consistency and fairness.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:26 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Typical Aggie.. dick riding Alabama. What are y’all gonna do when Jimbo gets y’all relevant in the West and Alabama is an actual division rival?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:30 pm to ReauxlTide222
Helmet to helmet on QB= Targeting, it’s been called all year. You can’t be this stupid
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:30 pm to Weagle25
quote:link
Forcibly driving the passer to the ground and landing on him with action that punishes the player.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:37 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:42 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What rule did he break?
Roughing the passer
Rule 9-1-9 #4
quote:
. Forcibly driving the passer to the ground and landing on him with action that punishes the player.
quote:
Holy cow The kid is being hyped as a top 3 pick and plays for Alabama and had a quote blow up on him twice this year. Yet no team found ANY reason to call him dirty this year. He form tackled a tiny dude and let him feel it at the end. Y'all wanting this guy ejected is truly sad.
You are acting like a whiny bitch, that is what is sad. I don’t care if he is ejected, I already said in this thread that I don’t think it should be targeting based on the rule. I will let others argue that by precedent maybe it could have been.
And “letting him feel it at the end” is precisely what should have triggered a penalty, as per the quote above. I don’t know if he is a dirty player, but committing a foul on purpose is a dirty move.
I’m not sure why you are so hung up on the “dirty player” angle. But if you don’t get called for dirty plays, you have less of a chance of being labeled as such.
People might be getting him confused with his boy throwing punches during a live play I don’t know.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:45 pm to ReauxlTide222
Says a lot that an Alabama fan doesn’t even know how to reference the rule book
When starting a debate about a rule being broken, nonetheless
When starting a debate about a rule being broken, nonetheless
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:57 pm to OceanMan
And poof he's gone
ETA: never mind he came back
ETA: never mind he came back
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:58 pm to OceanMan
I wasn't trying to embarrass anyone.
I was truly asking about the rule.
I was truly asking about the rule.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 1:59 pm to ReauxlTide222
And now that you have heard the rule?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 2:01 pm to Weagle25
Holy shite, man.
I'm not reading all of that.
I'll just do you a solid and believe you.
Can anyone show me an instance of a player being tossed in college football for driving a QB into the ground?
I'm not reading all of that.
I'll just do you a solid and believe you.
Can anyone show me an instance of a player being tossed in college football for driving a QB into the ground?
Popular
Back to top



1






