re: Was Brady better in Super Bowl 36 or Super Bowl 52?

quote:

---

I'm still butthurt Brady won MVP over Ty Law

---

THIS. Dude I’ve been preaching since that game Ty Law should have been MVP. It’s a total joke Brady won.

And the people saying Brady played better in XXXVI.

quote:

---

Doesn't matter... they lost SB52.

---

I guess the other 21 people on the field don't matter.

quote:

---

I'd say 505 yards on 28 completions is p good.

He was awesome last night. So yeah I'll go with SB52

---

Ok

Now make your argument on why Brady is better than Manning or Rodgers.


Please put that argument in this thread


Thanks

quote:

---

Ok

Now make your argument on why Brady is better than Manning or Rodgers.


Please put that argument in this thread


Thanks

---

I assume BayouBengals will have a hard time making this argument, Brady's a great QB from the cerebral aspect like Manning/Rodgers but he doesn't possess the measurable attributes let's be frank the dude has limitations in his ability and A-Rod's probably the most talented QB to ever play this side of John Elway

I've always said I thought Rodgers' peak was better than any other QB ever

quote:

---

It's almost like Brady hasn't been MVP of the league 3 times and isn't in the midst of unprecedented longevity.

Weird.

---

So, I seem to have stumped you


Please explain in this thread, like you have so many times before, why Brady is better than Manning and Rodgers

quote:

---

zero punts

---

Fumble is worse than a punt. They also went for it on 4th and twice he should have been picked off. Let's not pretend like he had his best game. Lots of RAC

I want to hear why you think Brady is better than manning. That isn't really asking much

quote:

---

I want to hear why you think Brady is better than manning. That isn't really asking much

---

Brady has been the beneficiary of legendary coaching from top-down and their willingness to diversify their offensive systems, Peyton's essentially had to be the OC for the Colts/Broncos his entire career while his HCs were almost exclusively defensive coaches with the HC label, plus Peyton's measurables are superior he's basically the prototypical drop-back passer with supreme erudite QB intelligence to match perfect quarterback

quote:

---

In their best 5 year stretches as measured by Approximate Value on Pro Football Reference, Brady (2007-2012) had a higher approximate value, threw for more yards, TDs, and fewer INTs than Manning (2003-2007). Manning had a slight edge in passer rating + average during that stretch.

---

Why their best 5 years though? Why not best 7? Or 9? Or 11? Maybe lucky number 13?


I understand you were just making an argument, but only using 5 years seems waaaay to small honestly