- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VIDEO: Tony Stewart hits opposing driver; driver has died according to reports
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:28 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:28 pm to lsupride87
Lunchbox is probably perplexed as to why ppl are found "not guilty" instead of "innocent" since everyone is presumed to be innocent in the good ole U. S. of A.
1
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:29 pm to boom roasted
quote:Gotcha. Not much of a boom, but i'll allow it because I dont like Lynch
I'm just laughing at how he thinks it's a "BOOM, gotcha" comment.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:31 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Lunchbox is probably perplexed as to why ppl are found "not guilty" instead of "innocent" since everyone is presumed to be innocent in the good ole U. S. of A.
I'd love to hear how you came to that conclusion.
Seriously admins? Can I at least get a warning? It's not like I'm alone here.
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Because he thinks you are dumb
I'd love to hear how you came to that conclusion.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:35 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'd love to hear how you came to that conclusion.
Another lunchbox tactic to add to the mix. Say something that doesn't make sense, wait for people to call you on it, then make them write a novella to explain why you are wrong, then make fun of them for calling you on it. This kind of fun could go on forever.
Also, condemn people for repeatedly asking the same question despite never making an honest attempt to answer it or explain why it's an invalid question.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:52 pm to uway
quote:
Not sure why he would be given the benefit of the doubt as to innocent intentions. There's a huge gap from completely innocent to murder.
Perception is greater than reality, the average American certainly proves this to be true. There's really nothing he can do to prove to some people he didn't have ill will, even though there's really nothing to prove that he did.
Perception, interpretation. Two people can look at exactly the same thing and have totally different conclusions.
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 8/11/14 at 3:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
I would encourage those on both sides of this argument to read the article linked from Road and Track.com by Steven Cole Smith.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:08 pm to TigerFred
quote:
I would encourage those on both sides of this argument to read the article linked from Road and Track.com by Steven Cole Smith
Form the article:
quote:Why, exactly?
The idea that he accelerated trying to hit Ward is beyond the pale.
quote:Why is it unthinkable?
The idea that any driver would purposely hit another over what was a comparatively minor, “that’s racing” incident is hard to swallow. That Tony Stewart would be the one to do it on purpose? That is unthinkable.
His support for those declarations seems to be that he is friends with Tony and that Tony is a nice guy. If he's a nice guy, he's a nice guy that is proven to lose his temper during races.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:09 pm to uway
quote:Because you would be saying that Stewart intentionally killed someone because they flipped him off.
Why, exactly?
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:47 pm to TigerFred
It's a good article about tony but it seems to focus on ppl that think tony would intentionally run over another driver. Ppl that actually believe that have to be few and far between.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:49 pm to uway
quote:
lose his temper
there was no reason for him to loose his temper, he wasn't the one that wrecked, you are really thick headed
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:50 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Ppl that actually believe that have to be few and far between.
Ummmmmmmm Have you been reading this board or any other social media?
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:51 pm to jorconalx
quote:sees some punk kid pointing his finger at the Tony Stewert.... his ego can only take so much of that
there was no reason for him to loose his temper, he wasn't the one that wrecked, you are really thick headed
Posted on 8/11/14 at 4:58 pm to Macintosh
I just watched the video. And I don't know what that guy was thinking. He was stepping farther and farther into danger. This is an overall terrible incident. And it could have been easily avoided
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:02 pm to TexasTiger1185
quote:
I just watched the video. And I don't know what that guy was thinking. He was stepping farther and farther into danger. This is an overall terrible incident. And it could have been easily avoided
Yeah. The biggest think to take away from this isn't whether Tony Stewart did it on purpose or not, but that the other guy was a total idiot. He did something incredibly reckless and lost his life because of it.
If I go into the hood and get shot, sure the other guy is guilty, but everyone would be ridiculing my arse for not knowing better than to stir shite up in the hood as a white boy.
There is a certain level of common sense people should have about not putting themselves in certain situations. Running out into the middle of a dirt race track at night with cars going 80+ mph is one of the situations intelligent people would avoid.
This post was edited on 8/11/14 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:08 pm to jorconalx
quote:
there was no reason for him to loose his temper, he wasn't the one that wrecked, you are really thick headed
So you watched the video and came to the conclusion that Tony didn't see the guy walking at his car pointing an accusatory finger at him?
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:19 pm to uway
quote:
So you watched the video and came to the conclusion that Tony didn't see the guy walking at his car pointing an accusatory finger at him?
Most logical explanation, considering the circumstances.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:22 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Stewart not seeing him until it was too late is more logical than Stewart intentionally running him over because he got flipped off.
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:26 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Stewart not seeing him until it was too late is more logical than Stewart intentionally running him over because he got flipped off.
Yes, easily
Posted on 8/11/14 at 5:34 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Stewart not seeing him until it was too late is more logical than Stewart intentionally running him over because he got flipped off.
Absolutely. When you consider the position of the two vehicles and the victim, it's the most natural explanation.
Page 154 of 165
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News