- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Top 10 College Football Programs - By Decade
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:23 am
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:23 am
Based on winning percentage.
2000s
1. Boise State: 112-17 (.868)
2. Texas: 110-19 (.853)
3. Oklahoma: 110-24 (.821)
4. Ohio State: 102-25 (.803)
5. Southern California: 88-26 (.772) [reflects victories lost in the 2004 and 2005 seasons]
6. Florida: 100-30 (.769)
7. TCU: 95-29 (.766)
8. LSU: 99-31 (.762)
9. Georgia: 98-31 (.760)
10. Virginia Tech: 99-32 (.756)
1990s
1. Florida State: 109-13-1 .(890)
2. Nebraska: 108-16-1 (.868)
3. Marshall: 114-25-0 (.820)
4. Florida: 102-22-1 (.820)
5. Tennessee: 99-22-2 (.813)
6. Penn State: 97-26-0 (.789)
7. Michigan: 93-26-3 (.775)
8. Miami (FL): 92-27-0 (.773)
9. Texas A&M: 94-28-2 (.766)
10. Ohio State: 91-30-3 (.746)
1980s
1. Nebraska: 103-20-0 .837
2. Miami (FL): 98-20-0 .831
3. BYU: 102-26-0 .797
4. Oklahoma: 91-25-2 .780
5. Clemson: 86-25-4 .765
6. Penn State: 89-27-2 .763
7. Georgia: 88-27-4 .756
8. (tie) Florida State: 87-28-3 .750
8. (tie) Michigan: 89-29-2 .750
10. Auburn: 86-31-1 .733
1970s
1. Oklahoma: 102-13-3 .877
2. Alabama: 103-16-1 .863
3. Michigan: 96-16-3 .848
4. Tennessee State: 85-17-2 .827
5. Nebraska: 98-20-4 .820
6. Penn State: 96-22-0 .814
7. Ohio State: 91-20-3 .811
8. Notre Dame: 91-22-0 .805
9. Southern California: 93-21-5 .803
10. Texas: 88-26-1 .770
1960s
1. Alabama: 85-12-3 .865
2. Texas: 80-18-2 .810
3. Arkansas: 80-19-1 .805
4. Mississippi: 72-20-6 .765
5. Bowling Green: 71-22-2 .758
6. Dartmouth: 68-22-0 .756
6.Ohio State: 67-21-2 .756
8. Missouri: 72-22-6 .750
8. USC: 73-23-4 .750
10. Penn State: 73-26-0 .737
1950s
1. Oklahoma: 93-10-2 .895
2. Mississippi: 80-21-5 .778
3. Michigan State: 70-21-1 .766
4. Princeton: 67-22-1 .750
5. Georgia Tech: 79-26-6 .739
6. UCLA: 68-26-3 .716
7. Ohio State: 63-24-5 .712
8. Tennessee: 71-31-4 .692
9. Penn State: 62-28-4 .681
10. Maryland: 67-31-3 .678
2000s
1. Boise State: 112-17 (.868)
2. Texas: 110-19 (.853)
3. Oklahoma: 110-24 (.821)
4. Ohio State: 102-25 (.803)
5. Southern California: 88-26 (.772) [reflects victories lost in the 2004 and 2005 seasons]
6. Florida: 100-30 (.769)
7. TCU: 95-29 (.766)
8. LSU: 99-31 (.762)
9. Georgia: 98-31 (.760)
10. Virginia Tech: 99-32 (.756)
1990s
1. Florida State: 109-13-1 .(890)
2. Nebraska: 108-16-1 (.868)
3. Marshall: 114-25-0 (.820)
4. Florida: 102-22-1 (.820)
5. Tennessee: 99-22-2 (.813)
6. Penn State: 97-26-0 (.789)
7. Michigan: 93-26-3 (.775)
8. Miami (FL): 92-27-0 (.773)
9. Texas A&M: 94-28-2 (.766)
10. Ohio State: 91-30-3 (.746)
1980s
1. Nebraska: 103-20-0 .837
2. Miami (FL): 98-20-0 .831
3. BYU: 102-26-0 .797
4. Oklahoma: 91-25-2 .780
5. Clemson: 86-25-4 .765
6. Penn State: 89-27-2 .763
7. Georgia: 88-27-4 .756
8. (tie) Florida State: 87-28-3 .750
8. (tie) Michigan: 89-29-2 .750
10. Auburn: 86-31-1 .733
1970s
1. Oklahoma: 102-13-3 .877
2. Alabama: 103-16-1 .863
3. Michigan: 96-16-3 .848
4. Tennessee State: 85-17-2 .827
5. Nebraska: 98-20-4 .820
6. Penn State: 96-22-0 .814
7. Ohio State: 91-20-3 .811
8. Notre Dame: 91-22-0 .805
9. Southern California: 93-21-5 .803
10. Texas: 88-26-1 .770
1960s
1. Alabama: 85-12-3 .865
2. Texas: 80-18-2 .810
3. Arkansas: 80-19-1 .805
4. Mississippi: 72-20-6 .765
5. Bowling Green: 71-22-2 .758
6. Dartmouth: 68-22-0 .756
6.Ohio State: 67-21-2 .756
8. Missouri: 72-22-6 .750
8. USC: 73-23-4 .750
10. Penn State: 73-26-0 .737
1950s
1. Oklahoma: 93-10-2 .895
2. Mississippi: 80-21-5 .778
3. Michigan State: 70-21-1 .766
4. Princeton: 67-22-1 .750
5. Georgia Tech: 79-26-6 .739
6. UCLA: 68-26-3 .716
7. Ohio State: 63-24-5 .712
8. Tennessee: 71-31-4 .692
9. Penn State: 62-28-4 .681
10. Maryland: 67-31-3 .678
13
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:34 am to RollTide1987
Ok
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:39 am to RollTide1987
This is one of the worst ways I've seen to do a top 10 of best programs. Win %?
So tcu had a "better" program than LSU without winning 2 NC and playing in another?
So tcu had a "better" program than LSU without winning 2 NC and playing in another?
This post was edited on 3/30/14 at 9:40 am
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:50 am to More beer please
Yep, TCU has shown how dominant their program is since they entered the Big 12. They went from winning 11 games a year, to losing seasons.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:58 am to RollTide1987
Dumb thread is dumb
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:00 am to Choupique19
quote:
Yep, TCU has shown how dominant their program is since they entered the Big 12. They went from winning 11 games a year, to losing seasons.
Which has almost nothing to do with increased difficulty of competition and almost everything to do with the product on the field going to shite.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:24 am to More beer please
quote:something tells me that 2011 want in the 2000s'decade
and playing in another
Posted on 3/30/14 at 10:30 am to More beer please
quote:
This is one of the worst ways I've seen to do a top 10 of best programs. Win %?
I'm not saying this is THE way you should do it by. It's just a different one.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:03 am to RollTide1987
quote:
[reflects victories lost in the 2004 and 2005 seasons]
what's good for the goose
quote:
4. Ohio State: 102-25 (.803)
6. Penn State: 97-26-0 (.789)
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:10 am to More beer please
quote:
So tcu had a "better" program than LSU without winning 2 NC and playing in another?
Wut? LSU went 2-2 in the 2000's
Posted on 3/30/14 at 11:21 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
what's good for the goose
I completely forgot about Ohio State and Penn State's vacated wins. Thing is, Penn State had 0 wins in the 00s when adjusted for vacation of wins.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 1:31 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
3. Marshall: 114-25-0 (.820)
Was Marshall Division I-A at that time?
Posted on 3/30/14 at 1:31 pm to RollTide1987
1930-1939 Bama 79-11 85 winning percentage is number 1.
I know you went from 70- 79 & 80-89 etc etc like all these guys do, but if 2000 is the last year in the 20th century and 1900 is the last year of the 19th century, then decades can't be 1900-1910, 1910-1919 etc etc but must be from 1901-1910 , 1911-1920 , 1971-1980 etc etc.
But I get that's the way everyone does it.
I know you went from 70- 79 & 80-89 etc etc like all these guys do, but if 2000 is the last year in the 20th century and 1900 is the last year of the 19th century, then decades can't be 1900-1910, 1910-1919 etc etc but must be from 1901-1910 , 1911-1920 , 1971-1980 etc etc.
But I get that's the way everyone does it.
This post was edited on 3/30/14 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 3/30/14 at 1:45 pm to droman225
quote:
Wut? LSU went 2-2 in the 2000's
We did?
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:06 am to RollTide1987
O too be a Clemson fan in the 80s.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:49 am to RollTide1987
Bama fans are seriously retarded.
quote:
1960's 1. Alabama: 85-12-3 .865
Yeah no shite. Boise State schedule.
Bama was 2-11-1 OOC against non-sec teams from 1965 to 1973.
They sucked arse!!!!!! Against non-lily white Southern Country Club football.
Let me get it through your head...the SEC was considered shite-arse football until the 1990's.
It was considered segregated - weak and out-dated.
Florida brought you back.
And from 2006 onward you dominated.
But nobody - except shallow minded people - ever considered the SEC top football until the 1990's...and even then - it was just Florida...which is why you were considered weak.
SEC national - (news flash SEC fan) - wasn't considered awesome football in the 1980's and 1990's...LSU sucked arse and most other programs in the SEC did as well in the 1990's.
And the SEC was nothing more than a bullied pulpit in a white Southern league for Alabama in the 1960's.
NO ONE TAKES YOUR RECORD SERIOUSLY IN THE 1960's - YOU PLAYED NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!
And when you did - you lost!
And especially not the 1960's or 1970's.
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:49 am to RollTide1987
Bama fans are seriously retarded.
quote:
1960's 1. Alabama: 85-12-3 .865
Yeah no shite. Boise State schedule.
Bama was 2-11-1 OOC against non-sec teams from 1965 to 1973.
They sucked arse!!!!!! Against non-lily white Southern Country Club football.
Let me get it through your head...the SEC was considered shite-arse football until the 1990's.
It was considered segregated - weak and out-dated.
Florida brought you back.
And from 2006 onward you dominated.
But nobody - except shallow minded people - ever considered the SEC top football until the 1990's...and even then - it was just Florida...which is why you were considered weak.
SEC national - (news flash SEC fan) - wasn't considered awesome football in the 1980's and 1990's...LSU sucked arse and most other programs in the SEC did as well in the 1990's.
And the SEC was nothing more than a bullied pulpit in a white Southern league for Alabama in the 1960's.
NO ONE TAKES YOUR RECORD SERIOUSLY IN THE 1960's - YOU PLAYED NO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!
And when you did - you lost! This revisionist history has to stop from Bama fans.
You weren't playing an equal playing field.
And especially not the 1960's or 1970's.
You were Boise St. vs. nobody. You didn't play week in and week out against the best athletes of the day - and when you play them - you usually LOST!!!!!!
You lost. You lost. You lost. You can't claim any crap about being the best program of the 1960's when you consistently lost to the real best programs - who cares that you had an awesome record in Apartheid SEC football? What a joke.'
Congratulations Bama...you are the Country-Club Football Champions of the White 1960's in the SEC.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 12:53 am
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:51 am to RollTide1987
quote:
6. Florida: 100-30 (.769)
quote:
8. LSU: 99-31 (.762)
Posted on 4/1/14 at 12:56 am to RollTide1987
Oh go ahead.
I love revisionism.
But Southern football was considered sub-par in the 1960's and 1970's - gained some momentum in the 1980's but still smirked at...
It wasn't until the late 1990's and specifically now - that it gained a real foothold as a football power conference.
That's real history.
Alabama's real history is about now...and what happened recently and an 80's title - everything before is bunk.
I love revisionism.
But Southern football was considered sub-par in the 1960's and 1970's - gained some momentum in the 1980's but still smirked at...
It wasn't until the late 1990's and specifically now - that it gained a real foothold as a football power conference.
That's real history.
Alabama's real history is about now...and what happened recently and an 80's title - everything before is bunk.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 12:58 am
Posted on 4/1/14 at 3:34 am to Zamoro10
Were two walls of text really necessary?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News