Started By
Message

re: The Cavs PnR Problem

Posted on 6/1/16 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Okay.


I think quality of competition is a pretty important context to keep in mind no?

I mean the Warriors second unit is made up all two way players including a finals MVP, a PG that could start on a number of teams and helped them beat Portland, A center that is poised to get a max contract, a PF that could start for a number of teams and can hit the three. Barbosa is no scrub either.

A lot of analysts give the edge to the Warriors in terms of the bench so Im not sure where this whole clear advantage is coming from. I mean I do, but I think its insanely misleading.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:05 pm to
Okay, if we're going to ignore statistics(and even ignore Hawks and Raptors have been very good defensive teams), Frye's shooting has essentially eliminated all shot blocking presence. Bron and RJ have been playing elite off the ball, with Delly/Bron being elite decision makers.

Defensively they've either completely overwhelmed second units due to personnel advantages or overwhelmed mix matched units with fresh legs and energy level. Bron and Shumpert have been able to cheat into passing lanes while using elite athleticism on recovery. RJ has done pretty well on that end, and Dellys always been a pretty good defender.

Transition wise you've had all capable passers with all being capable finishers/3 point shooters. Obviously some being elite in those aspects.

Posted by philabuck
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2008
10394 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:12 pm to
quote:

*Playing against East scrubs


The Cavs rolled through teams they were supposed to beat. Too bad the greatest team ever assembled couldn't do the same.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:13 pm to
Im not even sure who you're talking about as the PF. But defensively you're taking away ezili's shot blocking presence. Your making Iggy/Barnes/whoever follow around Bron/Shumpert/RJ on cuts or stick with them on the 3 pt line(or Bron at post). And on the other end you just don't have the shooting to match as is.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18405 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

quality of competition is a pretty important context to keep in mind no?



Portland is on par with ATL and DET. The HOU team that showed up to the playoffs wasnt on par with either of those teams, aside from a broken Memphis team, they were perhaps the worse team to come out the west in the past 10 years. Defensively HOU and POR are ranked in the lower half of the NBA. I'll give you OKC but you play who is in front of you. I don't care how you slice it, having a net rtg of 46.6 and an eFG% of 72% is incredible.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 11:29 pm
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Okay, if we're going to ignore statistics(and even ignore Hawks and Raptors have been very good defensive teams), Frye's shooting has essentially eliminated all shot blocking presence. Bron and RJ have been playing elite off the ball, with Delly/Bron being elite decision makers.

Defensively they've either completely overwhelmed second units due to personnel advantages or overwhelmed mix matched units with fresh legs and energy level. Bron and Shumpert have been able to cheat into passing lanes while using elite athleticism on recovery. RJ has done pretty well on that end, and Dellys always been a pretty good defender.

Transition wise you've had all capable passers with all being capable finishers/3 point shooters. Obviously some being elite in those aspects.


Your sample size to make these assertions is a hobbled Raptors, a Hawks team and Detroit. I agree the Cavs second unit is good, but incredible? A clear advantage over the Warriors? Don't agree with you there.

That sample size is not exactly world beaters. Again, GS is fielding a max center, a finals MVP that just helped get them over the hump defending Durant, a starting caliber PG and PF and all of them are two way players. That is far and away better then ANYTHING this Cavs unit has faced this post season.

The issue the Cavs have is they have a number of utility players. Frye is a spot up shooter and a defensive liability. Without offensive rebounds Thompson is a net zero on offense. Shumpert is not much of an offensive threat. Jefferson has been solid but Im not sure the Warriors are shaking at him beating them.

Lets also keep in mind you are pumping up a unit that will not get a ton of burn.

This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 11:20 pm
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32257 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

I mean the Warriors second unit is made up all two way players including a finals MVP, a PG that could start on a number of teams and helped them beat Portland, A center that is poised to get a max contract, a PF that could start for a number of teams and can hit the three. Barbosa is no scrub either.



AI is still very good, but not the same guy as he was last year. Livingston is underrated, but he's not THAT great...he might start for 5 teams. Ezeli may get a max contract (chances are probably not), but he isn't a max player. I love Mo Speights, but if he's starting for you...you got issues. Barbosa is still serviceable, but he's nothing more than that...he's replaceable
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18405 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

The issue the Cavs have is they have a number of utility players. Frye is a spot up shooter and a defensive liability. Without offensive rebounds Thompson is a net zero on offense. Shumpert is not much of an offensive threat. Jefferson has been solid but Im not sure the Warriors are shaking at him beating them.



Thompson isn't in this unit. Clearly you are confused.

quote:

also keep in mind you are pumping up a unit that will not get a ton of burn.


This unit has been starting the 2nd and 4th qtr ever since the Hawks series.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 11:23 pm
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

AI is still very good, but not the same guy as he was last year. Livingston is underrated, but he's not THAT great...he might start for 5 teams. Ezeli may get a max contract (chances are probably not), but he isn't a max player. I love Mo Speights, but if he's starting for you...you got issues. Barbosa is still serviceable, but he's nothing more than that...he's replaceable



So you still have three starting caliber players(one a finals MVP that just helped slow Durant to get them over the edge) vs a unit where pretty much no one would start on a solid team. You have a bench of all two way players vs a bench of mostly utility players, most with clear liabilities on one side of the ball.

I'm taking the Warriors second unit, sorry.

Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:30 pm to
I'm not sure what game they started playing it, but we're definitely over 10 so the line up has seen considerable run against diverse match ups and still has insane numbers across the board.

Your looking at the players individually. The greatest strength in that unit is your making Bron the best small ball 4 in the game and surrounding him by pieces that compliment him perfectly. Add to that Bron is the most well rested he's been and able to exert himself at the defensive end. Obviously he'll have to play a good bit more this series, but should still be carrying much less off the offensive load he's used to.

Lue tried putting that unit subbing in Kyrie for Bron and it was terrible.

GS's bench by itself isn't that incredible. It's strength is they're able to rotate in different players with their main guys and cause some serious match up problems with their line ups. As I've posted before the Cavs(more so than anyone else GS has played) have the personnel to do the same. Remains to be seen if Lue can make the required adjustments.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:30 pm to
I'm not sure what game they started playing it, but we're definitely over 10 so the line up has seen considerable run against diverse match ups and still has insane numbers across the board.

Your looking at the players individually. The greatest strength in that unit is your making Bron the best small ball 4 in the game and surrounding him by pieces that compliment him perfectly. Add to that Bron is the most well rested he's been and able to exert himself at the defensive end. Obviously he'll have to play a good bit more this series, but should still be carrying much less off the offensive load he's used to.

Lue tried putting that unit subbing in Kyrie for Bron and it was terrible.

GS's bench by itself isn't that incredible. It's strength is they're able to rotate in different players with their main guys and cause some serious match up problems with their line ups. As I've posted before the Cavs(more so than anyone else GS has played) have the personnel to do the same. Remains to be seen if Lue can make the required adjustments.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18405 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Lue tried putting that unit subbing in Kyrie for Bron and it was terrible.



Yea he scrapped that after the DET series. He started running it with LBJ in the Hawks series.
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 11:33 pm
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1596 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:34 pm to
He did it in game 4 vs the Raptors trying to get Bron some extra rest.
Posted by 13SaintTiger
Isle of Capri
Member since Sep 2011
18405 posts
Posted on 6/1/16 at 11:36 pm to
I guess he didn't totally scrap it, hopefully he doesn't do it v the Warriors. I don't think Delly and Kyrie should be on the floor together.
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:10 am to
you can cherry pick what you want but one thing that is not up for debate. Kyrie Irving and Kevin Love defended Pick and Roll will yield exactly 1.2 points per possession, which is the worst in the entire NBA for 2015-2016. Per Zack Lowe
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:11 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:16 am to
quote:

The Cavs are 21.6 percent from 3 the last 7 games?? Huh
Yeah the Cavs worst shooting performance from 3 all postseason is 31.7%. So that article makes absolutely no sense. Even if we put their 6 worst 3 point shooting games all season (96 games), it's just a bit over 20%.
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:21 am to
quote:

I'm not sure what game they started playing it, but we're definitely over 10 so the line up has seen considerable run against diverse match ups and still has insane numbers across the board.

Your looking at the players individually. The greatest strength in that unit is your making Bron the best small ball 4 in the game and surrounding him by pieces that compliment him perfectly. Add to that Bron is the most well rested he's been and able to exert himself at the defensive end. Obviously he'll have to play a good bit more this series, but should still be carrying much less off the offensive load he's used to.

Lue tried putting that unit subbing in Kyrie for Bron and it was terrible.

GS's bench by itself isn't that incredible. It's strength is they're able to rotate in different players with their main guys and cause some serious match up problems with their line ups. As I've posted before the Cavs(more so than anyone else GS has played) have the personnel to do the same. Remains to be seen if Lue can make the required adjustments.


This cherry picking and selective bias is getting old.

Their small ball unit is not going to be better then what the Thunder just threw at them. They don't have the personal. Jeff Van Gundy and Zach Lowe just did a podcast and spent ten minutes dissecting that. They introduce clear liabilities in every possible lineup they can throw as a counter.

The Cavs have some solid utility players but their bench isnt giving you what the Warriors get with Ezelli, Livingston and most importantly Iggy.

The Warriors have the better individual pieces as a second unit and the better lineup flexibility and overall strength with shifting them in with starters. The Cavs have beaten up on scrub eastern teams, The Warriors second unit has proven itself all season. It regularly closed out games and helped get them over the Portland Trailblazers who you all are not giving nearly enough credit for how well they played.

Though it is interesting watching cavs fans finding their best argument to try and make an analytical case that the Cavs have an advantage is by pumping up their 6-9th bench guys. Completely trying to deflect from the 6000LB gorilla in my OP.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:29 am
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32257 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:33 am to
quote:

So you still have three starting caliber players(one a finals MVP that just helped slow Durant to get them over the edge) vs a unit where pretty much no one would start on a solid team. You have a bench of all two way players vs a bench of mostly utility players, most with clear liabilities on one side of the ball.

I'm taking the Warriors second unit, sorry.


3 fringe starters or starters on bad teams are not the same as "3 starters". None of those guys are starting on quality the top 4 playoff teams from either division. If we're counting "fringe starters", Cleveland have a couple of starters on their 2nd unit as well and they have LeBron who far outweighs everything else.

Nobody is denying GS's 2nd unit's defensive prowess either, but their offense drops off drastically when they come in. something like 120-130 ORTG from the starters to high 90s-low 100s, that is a vast difference and isn't good at all, as to why klay has to come in so often to jumpstart them.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:35 am
Posted by NOLA Bronco
Member since Dec 2014
1898 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:39 am to
quote:

3 fringe starters or starters on bad teams are not the same as "3 starters". Cleveland have a couple of "fringe starters" on their 2nd unit as well, but they have LeBron who far outweighs everything else.

Nobody is denying GS's 2nd unit's defensive prowness, but their offense drops off drastically when they come in. something like 120-130 ORTG from the starters to high 90s-low 100s, that is a vast difference and isn't good at all.



Iggy is a FINALS MVP. He would start on A LOT of good teams. Quit being ridiculous. Ezelli would be a better center then a lot of starting centers right now.

Livingston would be fringe but he could immediately go to Utah, Milwaukee, Brooklyn, NY, Philly and Dallas and start. Thats just off the top of my head.

You Cavs fans are ridiculous. I kinda want to see CLE get a ring but you guys make me almost want to root for GS out of annoyance. Talking about Frye, Jefferson, Shumpert and Delly like they are the 2013 Spurs bench or something. They have strengths and weaknesses and have benefitted from an easy path to the finals you all are WAAAAYYY overvaluing.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:41 am
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35379 posts
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:41 am to
quote:

Your sample size to make these assertions is a hobbled Raptors, a Hawks team and Detroit.
And the sample of the article that led to your thread is the same as the sample you're criticizing minus two games.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:41 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram