- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stanley Cup Playoff Thread
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:33 pm to emoney
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:33 pm to emoney
The rule was cited incorrectly. The refs have the discretion to blow their whistles to protect obviously injured players. Had the puck bounced right to the front of the goal, and the Blues put it in, whatever. But the puck went all the way to the blue line while Bishop was in a heap. The refs should have blown their whistles, using the discretion granted them under the rules.
It was a legal goal, but pretty f'n cheap. And the hockey gods have a way of punishing those who honor the letter of the law yet violate the spirit. It doesn't mean the Blues will lose Game 7, but some cosmic disaster is coming for them to balance the scales. The hockey gods are cruel, and they will demand payment at the worst possible time. And probably completely out of proportion to their original sin.
It was a legal goal, but pretty f'n cheap. And the hockey gods have a way of punishing those who honor the letter of the law yet violate the spirit. It doesn't mean the Blues will lose Game 7, but some cosmic disaster is coming for them to balance the scales. The hockey gods are cruel, and they will demand payment at the worst possible time. And probably completely out of proportion to their original sin.
2
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:43 pm to Baloo
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/2/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 5/6/19 at 12:44 pm to Baloo
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/2/26 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:28 pm to GeauxTigers2020
Just checking in now on this. End of the first was a frenzy. I see Bos had a goal disallowed and CBJ hit a crossbar. Jackets need a goal on this PP.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:35 pm to Bunk Moreland
Goal BOS
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:48 pm to KosmoCramer
Big call coming here.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
A fricking minor 
Such a joke
Such a joke
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:51 pm to KillerNut9
frick the NHL
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
Bruins gooning it up. What else is new?
How the hell is that not the same or worse than the Pavelski call? That was intentional and incredibly obvious. Bruins are the most unlikeable team in hockey.
How the hell is that not the same or worse than the Pavelski call? That was intentional and incredibly obvious. Bruins are the most unlikeable team in hockey.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:51 pm to Bunk Moreland
Anderson looks like Ricky from Trailer Park Boys
What a shot to the chops that was
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:54 pm to Sao
That's a fricking joke.
So they dont handle things in game(Marchand and McAvoy) or out of game(Marchand).
Great work.
All around great.
"Must protect the players" unless one is down in the middle of the ice with a clear puck to the face (Werenski vs Pit).
Great stuff.
So they dont handle things in game(Marchand and McAvoy) or out of game(Marchand).
Great work.
All around great.
"Must protect the players" unless one is down in the middle of the ice with a clear puck to the face (Werenski vs Pit).
Great stuff.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:55 pm to KosmoCramer
Has anyone filed a missing persons report for Cam Atkinson yet?
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:57 pm to KosmoCramer
If Anderson was the checker there he would have got 5 game misconduct and be suspended for any possibly Game 7.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:58 pm to emoney
If you don’t think the fix is on...
Posted on 5/6/19 at 7:59 pm to emoney
I honestly think the San Jose thing affected them on that call and they figure further punishment can get doled out later. Excuse my ignorance, but is there a reason they couldn't take a middle ground approach and just go with a double minor?
Posted on 5/6/19 at 8:03 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
@treed1919
Jody Shelley, who’s working between the benches, just said in an interview broadcast throughout the building that the referees told the #CBJ bench that they didn’t see the hit.
eta. One of the first comments to that tweet is a picture of a ref staring straight at the hit with a perfect view
This post was edited on 5/6/19 at 8:04 pm
Posted on 5/6/19 at 8:04 pm to KillerNut9
Loved seeing the peanuts flung on the ice
Posted on 5/6/19 at 8:07 pm to Sao
shite’s about to get real in the 3rd. Torts is pissed and fan debris is about to fly in from all angles.
Posted on 5/6/19 at 8:09 pm to KillerNut9
How do you call a penalty if you never saw it?
Posted on 5/6/19 at 8:09 pm to tress4pres
Anderson has to be in auto concussion protocol right?
That needs to be part of penalty decisions.
The penalty was a clear major with game misconduct. But even erroring on the aide of, ok that guy is out for concussion protocol, we better send this guy out too.
That needs to be part of penalty decisions.
The penalty was a clear major with game misconduct. But even erroring on the aide of, ok that guy is out for concussion protocol, we better send this guy out too.
Page 193 of 330
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News