- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Some more Steph Curry ridiculousness
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:48 pm to shel311
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:48 pm to shel311
I'm not sure what to answer first, but my point about basketball defense is that it always has and always will boil down to whether you defend the man in front of you, or who you can double team. You can change who you double, but I feel like it's just a reaction to the player types in the league right now. You pick your poison... But you always have.
2
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:51 pm to bgtiger
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:51 pm to shel311
My God, do you even Triangle bro?
You have Mr. Quip all evening, but you have really stepped in it on this one.
You have Mr. Quip all evening, but you have really stepped in it on this one.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:52 pm to bgtiger
quote:Football will always boil down to forcing teams to punt, stopping the run...has football not gotten any more sophisticated since 1990 too?
'm not sure what to answer first, but my point about basketball defense is that it always has and always will boil down to whether you defend the man in front of you, or who you can double team
I don't think you're able to realize what you're saying is correct, but there are many more complex/sophisticated ways to do that.
What are your thoughts on the corner 3 in today's game vs 1990?
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:52 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Oh you think it's funny too, but don't know the tenets of the triangle?
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:52 pm to bgtiger
quote:what about it?
My God, do you even Triangle bro?
You gonna post some evidence, ever?
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:53 pm to bgtiger
quote:Tell me more about it?
Oh you think it's funny too, but don't know the tenets of the triangle?
Do you realize that the triangle isn't an effective offense in today's game because of the way defenses play now?
I bet you didn't realize that when you brought itup, but I'm sure you'll make something up to cover for it with zero evidence whatsoever.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:54 pm to shel311
Quick, go read about the Triangle offense and who touches the ball first, so you can make another snazzy quip
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:55 pm to bgtiger
quote:Explain how that relates to complex defenses.
Quick, go read about the Triangle offense and who touches the ball first, so you can make another snazzy quip
Then explain why that offense is virtually extinct in today's much different defensive schemes
I'll hold my breathe and wait for you to post your actual evidence. You kept saying our side wouldn't post evidence, it's your turn. I've only asked you 5 times now.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:56 pm to shel311
It was obviously in response to the snarky comment by shelia about Jordan not putting the ball in the hands of the big man in his offenses of the past
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:56 pm to bgtiger
Post your evidence.
Thanks
Thanks
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:59 pm to shel311
You mentioned Wellington, Cartwright, and Longley when I said the Jordan would have been more effective today without having to run an offense through big men, which even he did back the .
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:59 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Bruh, today's NBA defenses aren't any more sophisticated than high school defenses!!!
Posted on 2/29/16 at 8:59 pm to bgtiger
Post your convincing evidence.
Thanks
Thanks
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:01 pm to shel311
I'm flabbergasted, I can't even front right now 
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:02 pm to shel311
Not an opinion. Not an unproven superlative like more "sophisticated", it's a fact. The triangle ran through the big man, with the big man in the post preferably being the first touch in the set.
GFY.
GFY.
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:02 pm to bgtiger
Watch this
Then watch any game that's on tonight or tomorrow.
That's all you need. If you don't see the obvious differences in complexities, this discussion is not suitable for you.
It's that easy for you to see the light.
Then watch any game that's on tonight or tomorrow.
That's all you need. If you don't see the obvious differences in complexities, this discussion is not suitable for you.
It's that easy for you to see the light.
This post was edited on 2/29/16 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:04 pm to bgtiger
quote:It's a fact that defenses were just as complex in 1990, a fact I tell you!!!!
Not an opinion. Not an unproven superlative like more "sophisticated", it's a fact. The triangle ran through the big man, with the big man in the post preferably being the first touch in the set.
Post your evidence about the defenses.
Thanks
quote:He's mad everybody, look out!!!
GFY
This post was edited on 2/29/16 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:08 pm to bgtiger
quote:
GFY
Posted on 2/29/16 at 9:14 pm to TbirdSpur2010
I love the idea that defensive rule changes change drastically but not a single team would try to employ one single solitary new wrinkle to take advantage of the major changes.
I also love the idea that this is the height of basketball with completely different rules than high school, but the defensive schemes are exactly the same, no more difficult than high school.
Magical!!!
I also love the idea that this is the height of basketball with completely different rules than high school, but the defensive schemes are exactly the same, no more difficult than high school.
Magical!!!
This post was edited on 2/29/16 at 9:19 pm
Page 13 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News