re: Should UCLA be ranked..

You had them riled up before the game yesterday on the rant

quote:

---

Yes. Somewhere between 15-20.

---

How about we see them beat an above average team 1st?

I'll give 20-25 if we need to but hold up on 15-20.

Whenever A team loses, homers go to the "we suck" route and never give credit to the opponent.

Maybe UCLA is good? We'll find out.

Maybe LSU isn't as bad as people think. Maybe they just went West Coast and couldn't handle it like most SEC teams traditionally.

UT at UCLA
UT at Cal
Arkansas at USC

Shite, LSU struggled with an @ Washington team that won 3 games in the Pac10 but only lost to Bama and Florida by 10 points.

Let the season play out. I'm sure they'll do fine in the comfort of SEC Conference play.

There's been a good reason why SEC teams don't go West to play the PAC. They don't do well even if highly ranked. That's the history...Have helmet, won't travel.

But to answer the question...LSU was ranked. Why shouldn't UCLA be now???

ucla has the michigan back..A+
the defense was great. 85 bears approve. A.
kickers. A

I GOT THEM 4th.

LSU not ranked.

quote:

---

1) How do you know yet who’s “above average?”

---

We know LSU isn't.

Any watching saw that.

They will be ranked with all of the teams that lost and beating LSU. They will be around 24 if i had to guess.

#2 behind UGA.