- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints now implicated in Spygate II as well as Bountygate
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:07 pm to bddwolfpack
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:07 pm to bddwolfpack
I know for a fact that Brian Urlacher had his helmet wired at home and could switch between his defense coach and the opposing team's offense coach
I'm about to email ESPN and tell them about it and get on OTL
ETA: of course only if they offer my anonymity
ETA2: and clearly this only happened 8 and 9 years ago, then it stopped
I'm about to email ESPN and tell them about it and get on OTL
ETA: of course only if they offer my anonymity
ETA2: and clearly this only happened 8 and 9 years ago, then it stopped
This post was edited on 4/23/12 at 4:12 pm
0
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:08 pm to TTsTowel
Saints will still win the NFC South.
DWI
DWI
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:11 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
Had it happened to the Panthers, Buccs, or Falcons -- Saints fans would be all over this mocking that said team. Well, not all Saints fans. They have their share of good and bad just like any fanbase.
1000% (SWIDT?) correct.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:15 pm to bddwolfpack
quote:
ESPN did say civil charges could be filed.
what are civil charges exactly?
and if anyone files a civil suit it'll be Loomis and the organization, dolt.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:17 pm to bddwolfpack
quote:
But please continue to call me out and jump down my throat for starting a thread on a topic that is all over ESPN right now whether it's true or not.
judging by the way you handled the last thread regarding the Saints, we all know what you are trying to do. You failed miserably because no one really gives a shite about Loomis, and this is from 10 years ago. You were probably shitting your diaper at st matthew
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:19 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
ESPN did say civil charges could be filed.
what are civil charges exactly? and if anyone files a civil suit it'll be Loomis and the organization, dolt.
Often times the violation of a criminal law will give rise to a civil action (run a stop sign) for damages. Plaintiff would have to show harm from the eavesdropping. Sounds unlikely that other teams would pursue a claim and there are huge proof problems concerning damages as well as violation.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:20 pm to jddawg58
quote:
Often times the violation of a criminal law will give rise to a civil action (run a stop sign) for damages. Plaintiff would have to show harm from the eavesdropping. Sounds unlikely that other teams would pursue a claim and there are huge proof problems concerning damages as well as violation.
I know what a civil suit is brah. no one says "i'm going to file civil charges" but I get his point....
This post was edited on 4/23/12 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:20 pm to Elleshoe
From Yahoo:
quote:
There's a statute of limitations for any potential criminal charges, but civil cases and league action may arise.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:21 pm to bddwolfpack
civil suits
criminal charges
you don't have charges pending against you in a civil case brah.
criminal charges
you don't have charges pending against you in a civil case brah.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:22 pm to Elleshoe
I wanna like you w/ the Kent Lowe thing, but god damn you post "brah" too much.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:22 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You were probably shitting your diaper at st matthew
Nope. Try again.
Act like you know me when you don't.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:23 pm to HT713
quote:
I wanna like you w/ the Kent Lowe thing, but god damn you post "brah" too much.
I say brah when I'm speaking in a condescending tone to someone, chief.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:23 pm to Elleshoe
quote:
chief.
must be a sign of great respect.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:23 pm to Elleshoe
You knew what I meant.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:24 pm to bddwolfpack
sure I did.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:26 pm to bddwolfpack
Looks like the only solution is to execute everyone associated with the franchise.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:27 pm to bddwolfpack
quote:
league action may arise.
Hmmm...
Patriots punishment for Spygate:
quote:
The NFL says it has fined Bill Belichick the NFL maximum of $500,000, the Patriots $250,000 and ordered the team to give up next year's first-round draft choice (if it reaches the playoffs) because New England spied on the Jets defensive signals. If the Patriots don't make the playoffs they have to give up second- and third-round picks in April. Does the punishment fit the crime?
How bad could this actually turn out? Saints are already getting messed up with the Bountygate, now the Spygate II is roaming around... The combined penalties could be pretty severe.
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:27 pm to jddawg58
Lawyer in da house...
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:29 pm to DEANintheYAY
quote:
Lawyer in da house...
jdawg apparently missed my sarcasm in pointing out OP's choice of jargon
Posted on 4/23/12 at 4:35 pm to TTsTowel
quote:
How bad could this actually turn out? Saints are already getting messed up with the Bountygate, now the Spygate II is roaming around... The combined penalties could be pretty severe.
Well the league had video for the Patriots Spygate (which was never released to show exactly what happened conveniently). So any punishment would likely depend on whether the NFL and/or NFL Security find evidence that the rule breaking took place.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News