- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rumors starting that David Price might need Tommy John
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:41 am
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:41 am
its all over twitter right now that hes seeking a second opinion after having an MRI after feeling sore in his elbow
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:42 am to WestCoastAg
The dreaded "Dr James Andrews to be consulted"
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:44 am to WestCoastAg
No Price, No Papi, Pedroia and Porcello come back to earth...
East is wide open
East is wide open
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:47 am to tduecen
thank you Boston for the over payment to secure his services.
Sincerely,
Cardinal Fans
Sincerely,
Cardinal Fans
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:48 am to tduecen
theyre still "ok" based on projections but its definitely a blow
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:48 am to stlslick
for all the talk about how badly price was overpaid, he still gave the red sox surplus value
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:56 am to WestCoastAg
can you link us to at least one rumor?
Posted on 3/2/17 at 11:59 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
for all the talk about how badly price was overpaid, he still gave the red sox surplus value
For one year. It was a terrible contract.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:01 pm to RedHawk
quote:he gave the red sox $6 million in surplus value. sure, they probably wanted more out of him and his season wasnt as good as people were hoping. but it wasnt a "terrible" contract for one year. he gave them almost an extra win over what they bought him for
For one year. It was a terrible contract.
This post was edited on 3/2/17 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:03 pm to WestCoastAg
WAR/$ is such a shite stat. If you pay someone the 2nd highest AAV for any MLB player and the most total value for a pitcher contract, I need him to be a top 3 pitchers in all of baseball and he was not that .
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:04 pm to WestCoastAg
I would contend he offered closer to fair market value than surplus. With lower contracts this offseason, there have been suggestions of the cost of a win being more like $7 million instead of $8 million.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:07 pm to BobCoot
quote:not really. it does a good job at placing economical value on a players performance and if we want to evaluate contacts, thats where we should start
WAR/$ is such a shite stat.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:08 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
that very well may be the case. and if it is, id still argue thats not "terrible" or "horrible" or a humongous overpay
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:08 pm to WestCoastAg
David price was not a great pitcher last year and was compensated as the 2nd highest player in baseball AAV wise. For his salary I need Kershaw level production
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:09 pm to WestCoastAg
He is seeing Andrews today for a second opinion. He done.
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:10 pm to BobCoot
quote:he was a 4.5 win player
David price was not a great pitcher last year
quote:for his salary, you pretty much need the level of production that he gave the red sox
For his salary I need Kershaw level production
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:13 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
for his salary, you pretty much need the level of production that he gave the red sox
Like I said, for one year it is a good contract. We all knew he was overpaid and got too many years. When will teams learn that it isn't a good idea to sign a guy close to 30 for long term deals. What will his contract look like this year if he needs tommy john surgery?
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:18 pm to RedHawk
quote:people keep saying this but these contracts work out about as much as they don't
When will teams learn that it isn't a good idea to sign a guy close to 30 for long term deals.
quote:it won't look good, but this is a guy who never had issues like this before
What will his contract look like this year if he needs tommy john surgery?
Posted on 3/2/17 at 12:20 pm to WestCoastAg
At the highest level, there is always some value in their contract. Like I said, he was paid around fair market value last year.
Trout and Kershaw will never command $70 or $50 million AAV, respectively, even if that is what they are worth. War/$ should not be perfectly linear even though additional wins are because the market does not operate on that theoretical of a level.
Trout and Kershaw will never command $70 or $50 million AAV, respectively, even if that is what they are worth. War/$ should not be perfectly linear even though additional wins are because the market does not operate on that theoretical of a level.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News