- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Rank notable non-BCS teams in BCS era...
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:41 pm
IMHO without the assistance of any quantitative evidence:
1. Utah 2008 (beat Bama in Sugar)
2. Utah 2004 (beat Pitt in Fiesta)
3. TCU 2009 (TBD)
4. Boise 2009 (TBD)
5. Boise 2006 (Beat OU in Fiesta)
6. Louisville 2004(no BCS 1-loss ot Miami)
7. TCU 2008 (no BCS but 1 loss to OU)
8. Tulane 1998 (12-0)
9. Hawaii 2007 (Lost to UGA in Sugar)
1. Utah 2008 (beat Bama in Sugar)
2. Utah 2004 (beat Pitt in Fiesta)
3. TCU 2009 (TBD)
4. Boise 2009 (TBD)
5. Boise 2006 (Beat OU in Fiesta)
6. Louisville 2004(no BCS 1-loss ot Miami)
7. TCU 2008 (no BCS but 1 loss to OU)
8. Tulane 1998 (12-0)
9. Hawaii 2007 (Lost to UGA in Sugar)
This post was edited on 11/6/09 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:43 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
where is UL 2004?
BSU 2004 is prolly better than 7 or 8 on this list also
BSU 2004 is prolly better than 7 or 8 on this list also
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:43 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Top 3
Boise 2006
Utah 2008
Boise 2009
Boise 2006
Utah 2008
Boise 2009
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:44 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
Boise 2006
Utah 2008
Boise 2009
Utah 2004 > all of them
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
UL 2004?
good point
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Utah 2004 > all of them
That's just like your opinion, man.
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:46 pm to siliconvalleytiger
quote:
Boise 2006
Utah 2008
Boise 2009
Boise 2004>Boise 2006 imo even though they lost their bowl game
Also, the Utah teams are on a whole different level from these other teams
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:47 pm to usc6158
quote:
even though they lost their bowl game
to UL, who was pretty fricking bad the frick arse that year
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Utah 2004 > all of them
Utah's defense last year was waaaay better than in 2004. The offense wasn't as explosive, but basically nobody scored on them last year and they played a much more dificult schedule than in 04
Posted on 11/6/09 at 12:53 pm to usc6158
Utah 04's offense was real, son
Posted on 11/6/09 at 1:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
I wish looking back that Utah 2004 was not treated like such a novelty experiment and would have been paired with a serious BCS caliber team.
Posted on 11/6/09 at 1:18 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
quote:
I wish looking back that Utah 2004 was not treated like such a novelty experiment and would have been paired with a serious BCS caliber team.
the fact that most of america thinks that BSU was the first "BCS Buster" is so annoying to me
Posted on 11/6/09 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Utah 04's offense was real, son
They were, but they beat 0 good teams compared to last years team that beat 4 ranked teams, and two that finished in the top 10
Posted on 11/6/09 at 1:29 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Miami(OH) from 2003 has to be on that list somewhere.
They had Ben Roethlisberger at QB and destroyed almost everybody they played, except for Iowa, who went 10-3. That was also the year of the "MAC attack," where that conference was probably as good as it ever had been
They had Ben Roethlisberger at QB and destroyed almost everybody they played, except for Iowa, who went 10-3. That was also the year of the "MAC attack," where that conference was probably as good as it ever had been
Popular
Back to top
4







