- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ok the targeting rule has to be reassessed
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:48 pm
That to me was clear targeting in Tulane game
10
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:50 pm to FlappingPierre
No, it was a good clean hit.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:50 pm to FlappingPierre
I loathe the targeting rule...
But if that isn’t targeting, almost nothing is
But if that isn’t targeting, almost nothing is
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to POTUS2024
Crown of the helmet to the head/neck area of a defenseless player. That was textbook targeting and could be used as a prime example of the penalty.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to Choupique19
quote:
But if that isn’t targeting, almost nothing is
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to Choupique19
quote:
But if that isn’t targeting, almost nothing is
That's two guys I've seen knocked the frick out by helmet to helmet contact ruled no targeting.
Clownshow.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:51 pm to FlappingPierre
That was complete bullshite
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:53 pm to moock blackjack
Of the rule is that the hit was not targeting so to the terminology. The rule needs to be changed. That had the same effect as what they are saying is crown of the head
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:54 pm to FlappingPierre
They probably need to be able to call targeting/unnecessary roughness if they want. Then remove targeting to keep guys in but can keep the roughness call if they desire
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:56 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
No, it was a good clean hit.
Man I can't imagine going through life being this dumb
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:57 pm to FlappingPierre
It was targeting but they didn’t want to give Tulane 1st down on the 3 yard line…
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:58 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
They had the rule on the screen. Doesn't have to be crown of the helmet.
Has to be a hit to the head/neck area. It was a deliberate hit to the Tulane player's head.
Absolutely it was targeting.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 3:59 pm to FlappingPierre
How is that not targeting but Devin White shoving Nick Fitzgerald in the chest was?
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:01 pm to FlappingPierre
Tulane got a time out out of it. But it was targeting.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:03 pm to Choupique19
Targeting at end of Michigan game.
Targeting knocking out OSU Harrison.
Targeting in Tulane game.
I agree. If these aren’t targeting, nothing is.
It’s amazing how refs call games different in bowls vs. regular season. Same as NFL and NBA.
Where was the money? What was the line in these games!
Targeting knocking out OSU Harrison.
Targeting in Tulane game.
I agree. If these aren’t targeting, nothing is.
It’s amazing how refs call games different in bowls vs. regular season. Same as NFL and NBA.
Where was the money? What was the line in these games!
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:04 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
No, it was a good clean hit
Yup seemed that the defender had his head up and made a hard hit to a ball carrier. But I've seen that called targeting so damn often why wasn't it this time? I've seen less hits than that get called as targeting.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:06 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
This. The intent of the rule is to not hit with the crown of the helmet. Defender had his head up and hit with his forehead, top of the face mask. Hence, not targeting. Good no call IMO.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:09 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Forehead hit, not crown. Hard hit, but not targeting. I think they got that one right.
Crazy that people can make a judgement on a rule that they have never read.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:12 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
I agree. If these aren’t targeting, nothing is.
Correct. These all should have been called, based on what had been called in the past.
Either call it consistently, or get rid of it.
Posted on 1/2/23 at 4:17 pm to ConcreteThreshold
quote:
Crown of the helmet to the head/neck area of a defenseless player
That wouldn’t be a defenseless receiver in that situation
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News