- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NHL Playoffs.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:23 am to TexasTiger08
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:23 am to TexasTiger08
quote:They were.
For whatever reason, I thought the Flames would have been able to stick around as a top team. They didn't fade away quickly, but they never won the Cup...which is asking alot, I know. Hell, I thought they were better than TB that year.
The terrible decisions made by the Suters is a constant source of irritation for me. Let's just say the Flames have not just failed to make good decisions to build on that team, they have made truly disastrous ones. In fact, every personnel move they made in the last 12 months has been bad - many have been catastrophic (outside of cutting Bertuzzi).
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:23 am to Baloo
quote:
Watching the Flames is like sticking pins in your eyes
Or like watching the Orioles?
Sometimes I feel bad for you bud...
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:24 am to LSUCanFAN
quote:
I don't think you'll have to worry about d with sunburn playing like he's 30 years old and Markov coming back....
still need to upgrade from MAB and hammer time. gorges is good. gill will have to be servicable because i doubt we can replace him. Probably keep spacek, but who knows. again, if we cannot improve and build around the good core of playoff warriors gainey brought in with some size and grit and hands and some more defense we might as well go back to the drawing board and finally do what we should have done 10 years ago. scrap the team for picks and tank for 4 or 5 years then be a force through the draft.
This post was edited on 5/25/10 at 10:31 am
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:24 am to LSUCanFAN
What was the controversial call in that series? There was a goal counted for TB that crossed the line, or one that crossed for the Flames and was not allowed maybe? Either way, didn't that cost Calgary the Cup...maybe...or I am way off base here?
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:25 am to TexasTiger08
Compared to the Flames, the Orioles front office have been geniuses. Really.
The Habs are in a good place if they don't overreact to this run. but if it makes them think they are better than they are, they are in trouble.
The Habs are in a good place if they don't overreact to this run. but if it makes them think they are better than they are, they are in trouble.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:25 am to Baloo
quote:You did get my Thank-You card for Dion I assume....you didn't send one back I've noticed...
last 12 months has been bad - many have been catastrophic (outside of cutting Bertuzzi).
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:28 am to TexasTiger08
quote:I defer to my somewhat esteemed colleague Baloo?
What was the controversial call in that series? There was a goal counted for TB that crossed the line, or one that crossed for the Flames and was not allowed maybe? Either way, didn't that cost Calgary the Cup
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:31 am to TexasTiger08
quote:Game 6. Martin Gelinas. 3rd period. Shot win in, Khabibulin pad dragged it back into play. Ruled no goal. No review. Replays showed it went in. Flames lost in OT.
There was a goal counted for TB that crossed the line, or one that crossed for the Flames and was not allowed maybe? Either way, didn't that cost Calgary the Cup...maybe...or I am way off base here?
Can't talk about it.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:34 am to Baloo
That's what I thought...thanks for clarifying. Sorry for the memories...
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:39 am to TexasTiger08
Oh Oh Oh...can you imagine being a Sabres fan against Dallass??????
Hows that for Karma.....
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:40 am to LSUCanFAN
It's funny, because at that time I was really pulling for Dallas simply because of Texas ties...then I started dating a girl from Buffalo.
You can imagine how that went...between the Cup and the Cowboys-Bills Super Bowls.
You can imagine how that went...between the Cup and the Cowboys-Bills Super Bowls.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:41 am to TexasTiger08
I like how they changed the rule on the spot too...almost like the Tuck Rule for Brady's Pats against the Raiders.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:44 am to TexasTiger08
quote:
You can imagine how that went...between the Cup and the Cowboys-Bills Super Bowls
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:45 am to TexasTiger08
quote:Gary's sun belt team needed a bone...
I like how they changed the rule on the spot too...almost like the Tuck Rule for Brady's Pats against the Raiders.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 10:55 am to LSUCanFAN
It was a stupid rule, everyone knew it was a stupid rule, and they were so embarrased by the stupid rule, they didn't enforce it. Can you imagine going to replay after that goal and waiving it off because Hull had a toe in the crease that had no impact on the play?
Posted on 5/25/10 at 11:07 am to LSUCanFAN
quote:
can you imagine being a Sabres fan against Dallass????
remind me of that rule again....you were not allowed to be in the crease UNLESS you were skating in for a loose puck or were driving to the net or were shoved in by an opponent right? I believe you could not just park yourself inside the crease waiting for a pass or rebound, then the goal would be disallowed. that rule sucked regardless but is fuzzy right now.
Posted on 5/25/10 at 1:08 pm to Fat Bastard
Fantastic article, very insightful though the situation is very difficult to read with all the RFA's and UFA's.....
Posted on 5/25/10 at 1:48 pm to LSUCanFAN
quote:
and you were able to make it work? You got mad skills boy
it worked for two and a half years
Posted on 5/25/10 at 1:50 pm to Baloo
quote:
It was a stupid rule, everyone knew it was a stupid rule, and they were so embarrased by the stupid rule, they didn't enforce it. Can you imagine going to replay after that goal and waiving it off because Hull had a toe in the crease that had no impact on the play?
Hull in the crease didn't have an impact on the play. But at the time, I thought the rule was..."no being in the crease whatsoever."
Another example of the pussification of Gary B.
Popular
Back to top



1



