Started By
Message

re: NFL overseas - yea or nea?

Posted on 6/29/12 at 9:27 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84835 posts
Posted on 6/29/12 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

It would be cool if the NFL and EPL struck a deal that NYC gets an EPL franchise


While it would be incredible, this will never happen. There are 2 teams from Scotland that have tried to get out of their league and into the EPL for years and they are given a resounding no every time they do because they aren't English.
This post was edited on 6/29/12 at 9:28 pm
Posted by LSU Tammany Tiger
Folsom, LA
Member since Dec 2007
1642 posts
Posted on 6/29/12 at 9:33 pm to
NEA
Posted by Anfield Road
Liverpool Fan
Member since May 2012
1940 posts
Posted on 6/29/12 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

It would be cool if the NFL and EPL struck a deal that NYC gets an EPL franchise when London gets an NFL franchise.


It doesn't work that way overseas. You're not granted franchises. You have to play your way into the Premier League by merit. I think if you're going to try to expand internationally, I'd look at Toronto or Mexico City first.
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5054 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 6:18 am to
They say there is an NFL fan base in the UK that could support it. Yes there is a decent sized - and growing - fan base here but that fan base already has teams.
I've followed the falcons for the last 8 years, just because e.g. the Jags move to London I'm not suddenly going to change teams and then pay a couple of hundred to go watch a bore vs the Rams, then do the same the next week to watch them get blown out by the 49ers....not the best way to try to change aliances

To have any chance it would need to be a winning team, people wont go to watch them get blown out.
Kraft says he supports it, is he gonna move the pats? Didn't think so.
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 7:17 am to
Im fine with it if the name of the league is changing to the World Football League


the National Football League is American teams, if they want to expand to the world then they better follow thru all the way
Posted by bayou2003
Mah-zur-ree (417)
Member since Oct 2003
17646 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 11:40 am to
Nope, get a team in L.A. before sending one over seas. Even after that put one in Canada before over seas.
Posted by LSUCanFAN
In the past
Member since Jan 2009
28071 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 1:16 pm to
Toronto Yes
Expansion to L.A. yes
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64147 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 2:59 pm to
frick nay
Posted by LSUandAU
Key West, FL & Malibu (L.A.), CA
Member since Apr 2009
4948 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 3:02 pm to
I say no, but perhaps give NFL Europe another go with 6-8 team league.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60256 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 3:10 pm to
NATIONAL Football League

No
Posted by engvol
england
Member since Sep 2009
5054 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 3:12 pm to
and yet your crowned world champions
Posted by MStreetTiger
Dallas
Member since Dec 2007
12403 posts
Posted on 6/30/12 at 3:30 pm to
I can understand why they would want to do it. There is a huge. Market to tap.

But, the odds are just stacked against them. Globally, American football is a very minor sport. I just don't think they would have the support to make it work.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram