- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MSB Season Long Hockey Thread
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:12 pm to UltimateHog
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:12 pm to UltimateHog
I'll take 2 points whether it comes in a shoot out or not. Putting up another 2 points would really put some heat on Detroit and Dallas while the CBJ rest for the Sunday game.
1
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:13 pm to UltimateHog
We just need to win. We are hanging on by a thread. I highly doubt we get a lead here.
I understand the tiebreaker, but that's not happening tonight.
I understand the tiebreaker, but that's not happening tonight.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:15 pm to KillerNut9
Yeah but not having the tiebreaker is still rough, a ROW win tonight pulls within 1 of Detroit and CBJ has the 3rd tiebreaker already won.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:17 pm to UltimateHog
I hope they take a look at changing how OT operates. Handing out three points in a game is ridiculous. They also need to get rid of the shootout.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:19 pm to lsu223
quote:
I hope they take a look at changing how OT operates. Handing out three points in a game is ridiculous. They also need to get rid of the shootout.
The shootout gives an ending to a hard fought game that fans like. But it isn't fair.
I doubt it's going anywhere though.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:19 pm to KosmoCramer
The road trip looks like it's taking a toll on Natalie too
This post was edited on 4/18/13 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:20 pm to KosmoCramer
I don't think it'll go anywhere either just because the alternatives aren't great. I'd rather them go to the pre pre lockout method of just awarding a tie. Playoff seeds shouldn't be determined by something as arbitrary as shootout wins/losses.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:22 pm to KosmoCramer
I like the 3-2-1 system.
3 points regulation win, 2 points OT/SO win, 1 point OT/SO loss.
As far as the tiebreaker being ROW, it's perfect, should reward the team that wins more games without needing a shootout.
3 points regulation win, 2 points OT/SO win, 1 point OT/SO loss.
As far as the tiebreaker being ROW, it's perfect, should reward the team that wins more games without needing a shootout.
This post was edited on 4/18/13 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:23 pm to UltimateHog
3-2-1 is probably most fair. It would still preserve the excitement of the shootout.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:25 pm to lsu223
quote:
Playoff seeds shouldn't be determined by something as arbitrary as shootout wins/losses.
The tiebreaker does not count shootouts.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:25 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
As far as the tiebreaker being ROW, it's perfect, should reward the team that wins more games without needing a shootout.
True, but it shouldn't need to be like that.
SO win = OT or Regulation win = Unfair
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:26 pm to KosmoCramer
Ties should be decided by sending out each team's biggest goon onto the ice and having a battle royale.
Posted on 4/18/13 at 11:41 pm to KillerNut9
CBJ powerplay.
The equalizer needs to happen here.
We have been pitiful on the power play lately.
The equalizer needs to happen here.
We have been pitiful on the power play lately.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:03 am to KosmoCramer
God fricking damn it. Can't say I'm disappointed with the road trip so far though. They need to win out. frick the Kings. I hate Jeff Carter.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:36 am to UltimateHog
quote:
The tiebreaker does not count shootouts.
I'm just referring to how many points teams can rack up in shootout losses and the affect this has on the standings. Take the Canucks for example, in third place now but wouldn't even be winning their division if not for points earned in shootout losses.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:39 am to lsu223
quote:
Take the Canucks for example, in third place now but wouldn't even be winning their division if not for points earned in shootout losses.
It's not points for shootout losses, it's going to OT.
And they could still be leading FWIW, depending how points were awarded.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 12:40 am to lsu223
quote:
I'm just referring to how many points teams can rack up in shootout losses and the affect this has on the standings. Take the Canucks for example, in third place now but wouldn't even be winning their division if not for points earned in shootout losses.
They don't get a point for a shootout loss, they get a point for going to OT. Whether or not they lose in OT or a shootout doesn't change their point total.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 1:44 am to UltimateHog
I know the point is awarded the moment you get into OT, I just don't like that one point gets awarded to a team that loses in a shootout and the winner is awarded two points.
Unless a regulation win becomes worth three points, there shouldn't be three points awarded in a game that goes to OT.
Unless a regulation win becomes worth three points, there shouldn't be three points awarded in a game that goes to OT.
Posted on 4/19/13 at 1:47 am to UltimateHog
quote:
Jesus man you are turning into TNBhoy.
no thats you esp with you being delusional
sucks we took the L esp vs a potential 1st round match up
This post was edited on 4/19/13 at 1:49 am
Posted on 4/19/13 at 3:35 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
no thats you esp with you being delusional
Don't get mad because someone else was doing the exact same thing and we made a joke at you.
You're a fun punching bag.
Page 127 of 148
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News