- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Miami & Denver winning streaks show need for NBA contraction?
Posted on 3/24/13 at 9:15 pm to PrimeTime Money
Posted on 3/24/13 at 9:15 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
What about when the Bulls went 72-10 one year and won 6 championships in 8 years?
or the Celtics back in the 60s winning 9 of 10?
The issue in basketball is there are relatively few people on the floor and if you get the right 3 or four guys on a team you can dominate.
Posted on 3/24/13 at 9:32 pm to thewarmth
Do the "extra" teams make money? If so, the answer is no.
You think any of these leagues are really about anything else than making the owners money?
You think any of these leagues are really about anything else than making the owners money?
Posted on 3/24/13 at 9:33 pm to molsusports
quote:twice in the history of the NBA has a team won 25 straight games. its the exception not the rule and hardly a reason to start changing the foundation of the league.
Miami winning streak show need for NBA contraction?
Posted on 3/24/13 at 10:52 pm to Suntiger
The formation if the superfriends in Miami us the problem.
All the stars are going to force their way on to a few teams.
Sucks as a fan knowing your team has no chance unless a trio of 25 year old millionaires conspire to force their way into your team.
All the stars are going to force their way on to a few teams.
Sucks as a fan knowing your team has no chance unless a trio of 25 year old millionaires conspire to force their way into your team.
Posted on 3/24/13 at 10:58 pm to rondo
Free market system is a bitch aint it
Posted on 3/24/13 at 11:01 pm to wildtigercat93
Nees more teams, a lot of teams have 2 shpeestars or more. Could go to 36 teams easily
Posted on 3/24/13 at 11:05 pm to sgallo3
If you actually watch the NBA and not just the highlights, then most likely you aren't posting about contraction.
Posted on 3/24/13 at 11:19 pm to RonBurgundy
Ten years ago Miami, Denver, Memphis/Vancouver, Seattle/OKC, Warriors, Clippers and Hawks would've been prime contraction candidates. Teams like Sacramento, Hornets, Timberwolves, that would be great contraction candidates now were consistent playoff teams in the early part of the 00's. You may not win a title, but being a top 6-8 team in the league is definitely cyclical.
Since 2000 6 different teams have won the NBA finals, and 5 more teams have made the finals. In that same timeframe, 8 teams have won the super bowl, and 7 more teams made the superbowl without winning it.
So statistically NBA=20% of teams won titles/NFL=25% of teams win titles. NBA=37% of teams make the finals/ NFL= 47% of teams make the finals. Doesn't seem like that big a difference
Since 2000 6 different teams have won the NBA finals, and 5 more teams have made the finals. In that same timeframe, 8 teams have won the super bowl, and 7 more teams made the superbowl without winning it.
So statistically NBA=20% of teams won titles/NFL=25% of teams win titles. NBA=37% of teams make the finals/ NFL= 47% of teams make the finals. Doesn't seem like that big a difference
Posted on 3/24/13 at 11:28 pm to St Augustine
quote:
They need to get rid of these.
Or they could get better GMs.
Popular
Back to top

1






