- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there anyone here who doesn't think Nicklaus is the GOAT
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:55 pm to accnodefense
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:55 pm to accnodefense
Tiger is the greatest golfer of all-time.
There is not a single golfer in the history of the world that has been as good as Tiger for as long as Tiger. Nicklaus wasn't as good as Tiger at both of their peaks.
The only reason he doesn't have quite as many majors as Nicklaus is because he's had injury trouble for years... mostly from carrying the PGA on his back for so long.
Golf courses also used to be easier when Nicklaus played. They changed the courses and made them more difficult specifically because Tiger Woods was so dominant.
There is not a single golfer in the history of the world that has been as good as Tiger for as long as Tiger. Nicklaus wasn't as good as Tiger at both of their peaks.
The only reason he doesn't have quite as many majors as Nicklaus is because he's had injury trouble for years... mostly from carrying the PGA on his back for so long.
Golf courses also used to be easier when Nicklaus played. They changed the courses and made them more difficult specifically because Tiger Woods was so dominant.
This post was edited on 7/13/15 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:56 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Hate the guy all you want.
Don't hate him Baw.
quote:
To act like he didn't change golf
I'm not. I'm not. I'm saying Jack's career is more dominant than Tiger's, and more accomplished.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:56 pm to Taurus
quote:
Jack's competition: Gary PLayer(9), Arnold Palmer(7), Tom Watson(8), Lee Trevino(6), Seve Ballesteros(5), Ray Floyd(4)
And you left off a few.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:57 pm to VABuckeye
He prolly will now. He's gonna be a doctor. 
Posted on 7/13/15 at 6:59 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Golf courses also used to be easier when Nicklaus played. They changed the courses and made them more difficult specifically because Tiger Woods was so dominant.
Jesus Christ. So much fallacy in this post. They changed courses because of Nicklaus as well.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:01 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
He could play a true blade/MB or CB combo
913, with a BB7 XStiff, and a Scotty.
Prolly win 22 Majors. Easily
All you did was restate your original point
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:02 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
He's opened the door for African Americans to succeed in a racist country club game.
He gave so much back so that the game could be dominated by the flood of young Afican Americans following in his footsteps!
Oh wait.
Are their any young Thai guys?
It has always offended me that his black half gets all the credit. How is that not racist?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:04 pm to KingofthePoint
Yeah
He could have all the advantages of modern equipment, specifically the long irons and driver/fairway woods, while hitting bladed scoring irons.
Hard to argue that he'd be even better than he already was.
He could have all the advantages of modern equipment, specifically the long irons and driver/fairway woods, while hitting bladed scoring irons.
Hard to argue that he'd be even better than he already was.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:04 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
Tiger is the greatest golfer of all-time.
There is not a single golfer in the history of the world that has been as good as Tiger for as long as Tiger. Nicklaus wasn't as good as Tiger at both of their peaks.
The only reason he doesn't have quite as many majors as Nicklaus is because he's had injury trouble for years... mostly from carrying the PGA on his back for so long.
Golf courses also used to be easier when Nicklaus played. They changed the courses and made them more difficult specifically because Tiger Woods was so dominant.
What we have he-ahhh, is a suhdafied Tigah nut licka, baws.
Them knee injuries from carrying the PGA, who knew.
Why didn't he pop those back in and just keep grinding?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:05 pm to VABuckeye
quote:Prove it.
Jesus Christ. So much fallacy in this post. They changed courses because of Nicklaus as well.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:05 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:
Would modern equipment have made Jack better?
Yes but it would've also made the field he plays against better. It's not like today's equipment would only elevate Jack's,it would elevate his opponents as well putting gap back to where it was with the Older equipment.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:05 pm to gthog61
quote:Funny enough, Tiger actually had a big impact on golf in Asia.
He gave so much back so that the game could be dominated by the flood of young Afican Americans following in his footsteps!
Oh wait.
Are their any young Thai guys?
It has always offended me that his black half gets all the credit. How is that not racist?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:06 pm to VABuckeye
I know, I stopped at 4 major wins. It would be uglier for Tiger to keep going, but point was made.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:08 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Well, tiger has done what he's done with modern equipment.
It'd be interesting to have seen what jack could have done with it.
As tidebaw mentioned earlier, woods ain't hitting a persimmon 350 with any consistency. Jack did. Jack would have smoked modern drivers with torque and horses well into his late 40's. That's why I say prolly 22.
It'd be interesting to have seen what jack could have done with it.
As tidebaw mentioned earlier, woods ain't hitting a persimmon 350 with any consistency. Jack did. Jack would have smoked modern drivers with torque and horses well into his late 40's. That's why I say prolly 22.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:09 pm to Taurus
quote:Or we could say that the competition in Jack's era was so weak that only a select handful of golfers were capable of winning majors.
I know, I stopped at 4 major wins. It would be uglier for Tiger to keep going, but point was made.
But in Tiger's era, there were so many capable golfers that nobody stood out... except for Tiger because he was head and shoulders better than everyone.
Who's to say?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:11 pm to PrimeTime Money
Where do nerds get off discounting Jack's competition?
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:11 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:If you think Jack can out-drive Tiger you're out of your horny little adolescent mind.
As tidebaw mentioned earlier, woods ain't hitting a persimmon 350 with any consistency. Jack did. Jack would have smoked modern drivers with torque and horses well into his late 40's. That's why I say prolly 22.
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:12 pm to BRgetthenet
He could play a true blade/MB or CB combo
913, with a BB7 XStiff, and a Scotty.
Prolly win 22 Majors. Easily.So Jack was 100 yds longer? Hitting 350 with persimmon woods? Give me a break. And they call a Tiger fans "dick riders"....okay
913, with a BB7 XStiff, and a Scotty.
Prolly win 22 Majors. Easily.So Jack was 100 yds longer? Hitting 350 with persimmon woods? Give me a break. And they call a Tiger fans "dick riders"....okay
This post was edited on 7/13/15 at 7:13 pm
Posted on 7/13/15 at 7:12 pm to BRgetthenet
quote:My point is we don't know. You can't say Jack's competition was better due to how many majors other players won.
Where do nerds get off discounting Jack's competition?
Popular
Back to top



2


