Started By
Message

re: Is Daryl Morey losing his mind?

Posted on 8/16/18 at 8:29 pm to
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50337 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

1. Thinks he can win a title with Harden as the team's best player


Well he was one blown hamstring away from likely doing it

quote:

2. Signs old Chris Paul to a five year deal.


They mocked him for signing him in the first place, you can either get him for for 5 years or no years, we need to win now.

quote:

3. Let's two 3 and D wings walk, then rejoiced when Melo signs


Let? Ariza got 14M, we ain’t paying him that much.


Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 9:37 pm to
It’s one of those I rather die on my feet then live on my knees scenario. It is more honorable to give your all and come up short on a no title non super team then it is to live on your knees by resorting to a super team in order to get your title.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

It is more honorable to give your all and come up short on a no title non super team then it is to live on your knees by resorting to a super team in order to get your title


Thats all well and good and I agree with your premise: had he won an NBA title with that shite sandwich of a squad it likely would've been considered one of the greatest accomplishments of all-time. However, we have to take context into account with The Decision: he was an unrestricted free agent, the Boston Big 4 was obstructing the entire East's path to the Finals and would still be viable another 2-3 years, and he wanted to win a title within that context and Gilbert was doing squat to facilitate that (he wasn't LeGM then), I can't blame him for wanting to win a chip and, at the time, thought it was the coolest thing ever constructing that team. I mean IDC who you are, 8 straight Finals appearances and championships with 2 separate franchises aint anything to sneeze at hell its probably one of the greatest achievements in team sports, the guy's a winner whether you want to admit it or not, you gotta respect that. It goes both ways here like it does basically everything else in life.
This post was edited on 8/16/18 at 11:27 pm
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 11:37 pm to
There’s many players who woulda gone to 8 straight finals if you put them on the heat super teams and then the squads he had in Cleveland considering the lack of competition in the lowly east the last decade.
Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 8/16/18 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

There’s many players who woulda gone to 8 straight finals if you put them on the heat super teams and then the squads he had in Cleveland considering the lack of competition in the lowly east the last decade.


What's your opinion about Magic Johnson and his 9 Finals appearances with that Laker superteam?
Posted by PresidentJerry
Oakdale
Member since Aug 2018
53 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 9:00 am to
Well he put together a team that took GS to 7 games and probably would have won barring an injury. I think u gotta respect Morey.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 9:07 am to
Yep. Built a squad with only one all star who won 65 and damn near took out GOAT. We are talking a 70 win team easy with good health with only one all star. Idk if that’s more of a endorsement for harden or morey but wow we are lucky to have both of them in the league.
Posted by GoldenBoy
Winning!
Member since Nov 2004
42010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 9:12 am to
Last year's win total was an anomaly with all the teams that were tanking.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 9:15 am to
not really. The 10-12th place teams that usually DONT tank but were last year don’t beat a team as good as CC if they were tanking or not tanking. Those 10-12th place teams pick up their extra wins mostly against your 4-9 seeds if not tanking. So it is the pels, Nuggets, okcs, etx etx of the league who had the Inflated win totals moreso than CC.
Posted by GoldenBoy
Winning!
Member since Nov 2004
42010 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:03 am to
quote:

So it is the pels, Nuggets, okcs, etx etx of the league who had the Inflated win totals moreso than CC.


Weird how everything is skewed towards the Rockets.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:06 am to
Not just the rockets. It’s all of your top teams. Your top teams are always expected to lose to the worse teams at a lower rate than the more average teams. it’s pretty simple math. Something I like to call Pythagorean expected wins.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27304 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:11 am to
That’s not what Pythagorean win expectation means...


By the way, Daryl Morey brought a modified version of the Pythagorean win expectation formula to basketball, and that’s what this formula is here:

This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 10:14 am
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83406 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:14 am to
He didn't say that's what it means.

He said that's what he likes to call it.

Leave my man Boom alone.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:15 am to
It’s how many games you expected to win based on your net rating. a team with a lower net rating ie your pels, okcs, etc were expected to win low 40 games. But Bc of the tankers this year they won more. I was a math major I have a good grip on all these stats so you can trust that I’m not mis using them bubba.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
20900 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:42 am to
Net rating is based on how well you do against your OPPONENTS you fricking boob.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 10:48 am to
Of course. Teams with lower net ratings lose to teams at the bottom of the standings at a higher rate than those squads w higher net ratings. Ie pels record was inflated by the tankers more than CC.
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
20900 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:03 am to
Net rating is based off of your opponent. So if those teams aren't tanking their net ratings would be better and would affect the net rating of every team that they've played, including the Rox. Thus changing everyone's win total.
This post was edited on 8/17/18 at 11:07 am
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59689 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:18 am to
yea but a great team like CC would have loss less than one win by my calculations. Whereas pels and the other teams bunched up there at 45-48 wins woulda had more like 4-5 wins less by my calculation.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110665 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

2 MVPs
Less than Lebron

quote:

2 MVPs,
Same as Lebron

quote:

Greatest shooter ever
He is, that's great. Lebron is the greatest player ever.

quote:

Also, Curry is a top 25 all timer, with another 5-7 years to add to his legacy. Might crack Top Ten.

Lebron is a top 1, top 2 at the absolute worse.

quote:

I'm sure you agree hes surpassed Chris Paul,right?

Yes
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110665 posts
Posted on 8/17/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

It’s how many games you expected to win based on your net rating. a team with a lower net rating ie your pels, okcs,
And yet when OKC's net rating yielded more pythag wins, you weren't having that argument.

Boom talking in circles version# 9888299829844.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram