re: Insane pic of LeBron postgame

If it is, it is by a count hair. Which doesn’t prove much of anything for your side.

quote:

---

Who are these 8 players that have actually played significantly this season?

---

Clearly you know since you had to have research their shooting to have drawn strong conclusions about their shooting.

quote:

---

Do you even eFG% or TS%?

---

So you make a stupid point about three point shooting, but when the point is refuted and the stupidity of it further highlighted by using your won team, you switch to a suggest metric?

No wonder you parrot boom talking points.

quote:

---

Rodney Hood has shot 31.8% from 3 since joining the Cavs (Shot 38% on Jazz) and George Hill has shot 33% since joining the Cavs (Shot 45% on Kings). So much for the LeBron 3pt effect.

---

And Clarkson's shooting has improved substantially, but I used season average because it's more reliable when discussing them as shooters with such a small sample size with the Cavs. But if we're making a small sample size argument, after tonight, Hill is shooting 42.4% over the last 10 games from three.

And I almost added their percentages with the Cavs v. the overall season. And I was half hoping that you would point out that Hood's and Hill's had dropped, to show that you would choose an less reliable metric to support your argument. But you didn't just do that, you ignored the example of that same metric that didn't support your argument. But like a true hack, you couldn't just top with the cherry picked stats. Nope you had to go way further and somehow use those stats as refuting a reputation LeBron has garnered in his 15 years, ignoring not only thousands of games and focusing on just a 16 game sample for one player and a 13 game sample for another, but also ignoring that they're shared floor time is even less than that.

I must say I'm impressed. You're still a little too much like your mentor, but you've shown that your less bombastic personality, you may also be able to discretely outdo his ridiculousness.

gonna break the record for nba finals loses with the easiest route.

You come In here acting all big and bad after the cavs finally get a good win, you been cowering all year long while they get their shite pushed in

Real convenient that he gets done with them on a night when they get the best win of the season.

I guarantee he won’t be here posting after the finals games if it is Houston - Cleveland bc that’s a 5 game series in Houston’s favour.

quote:

---

guarantee he won’t be here posting after the finals games if it is Houston - Cleveland bc that’s a 5 game series in Houston’s favour.

---

He also won't be here posting after a Nets-Mavs finals. Because neither is happening. Harden showed his true colors already, he's never gonna get a ring or even goes to the finals unless he can go back to being the third option for a team.

quote:

---

You come In here acting all big and bad after the cavs finally get a good win, you been cowering all year long while they get their shite pushed in

---

Well I didn't even post when LeBron had the game winner v. Minnesota. But I obviously post more in the postseason but I think I even post more in the of season.

To be honest though, I haven't avoided the discussions because of the Cavs as much as I've avoided them because I find myself agreeing with you that Harden is the MVP, but then when you add your typically boomisms, it creates an uncomfortable cognitive dissonance because I can't disagree with the main point of your argument.

The only reason I posted tonight was because your understudy Tigger, was trying to branch out in an argument on his own, but he hasn't mastered your artful use of stats to make a somewhat legitimate point within a far more ridiculous point about some abstract concept.

He improved once I threw in a couple facts, so I think your tutelage is showing a bit.

Well humbly pretty much no one here has mastered my combo of:

Knowing the game
Knowing the numbers and the context behind them

Some know the game but don’t know the numbers.

Some like you know the numbers but don’t know the game enough to apply context.