Started By
Message

re: In case you still think the Mavs aren't soft

Posted on 6/13/11 at 8:55 pm to
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

You come across like some dumb arse calling about his TV not working, "Well... It was broken when I called you but it's working now."
Very witty.

Seriously, guys, I don't see what the big deal is. The Mavs played like pussies, and they were down 2-1, and I started this thread.

Then they played differently and won three straight. Is this true, or am I hallucinating?

Does the fact that they kicked arse in the past three games change how they played in the first three games? If so, I really need to take some time to rethink how I see the concept of time.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Chandler got outrebounded by Wade, and he got posterized by Wade twice. I don't get the idea that Chandler is somehow tough. He is one of the softest starting centers I've ever seen.


You must be a very bitter Hornets fan. Chandler is a hell of a lot better and tougher than Dampier was. Chandler gave the Mavs a solid defender in the paint, something that they never had.

quote:

Not only is this untrue, but it contradicts what you've said in this very post. Dirk crashed the boards in the 2nd half of the series, and it made a huge difference. He became a multidimensional player overnight, and it KILLED the Heat.


No he didn't. As I pointed out, Dirk had more rebounds in games 1-3 than he did in games 4-6. HE HAS AVERAGED 10+ REBOUNDS IN THE PLAYOFFS THROUGHOUT HIS CAREER. News flash, Dirk has always been able to rebound in the playoffs.

quote:

Maybe Dallas' defense was better in this series than we thought.


No, maybe it was better than YOU thought.

quote:

Does the fact that they kicked arse in the past three games change how they played in the first three games? If so, I really need to take some time to rethink how I see the concept of time.


If any team played differently in the last 3 games it was the Heat. Mostly Wade in the last 2. Dallas played their normal game, made a few adjustments (No Peja, more zone) and hit the open shots that they had missed in the 1st 3 games.
This post was edited on 6/13/11 at 9:15 pm
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

Chandler is a hell of a lot better and tougher than Dampier was.
There's an oak tree on my block that's a tougher defender than Dampier was.

You might as well say that the Cowboys have a great quarterback in Romo because he's better and tougher than Anthony Wright.
quote:

News flash, Dirk has always been able to rebound in the playoffs.
He's always been able to rebound because he's 7' tall. He just hasn't always done it.
quote:

quote:
Maybe Dallas' defense was better in this series than we thought.



No, maybe it was better than you thought.
Who the hell was talking about how good the Dallas defense was?
quote:

If any team played differently in the last 3 games it was the Heat. Mostly Wade in the last 2. Dallas played their normal game, made a few adjustments (No Peja, more zone) and hit the open shots that they had missed in the 1st 3 games.

It's impossible to not notice the difference in the way Dallas played (you even point out their different strategy by taking Peja out), but otherwise this is a good point.
This post was edited on 6/13/11 at 9:26 pm
Posted by Ghazi
Dallas Mavs 2011 NBA Champions
Member since Dec 2007
16121 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:23 pm to
Chandler is a top 10 rebounder and made all-NBA 2nd team defense this year

far from soft

just admit YOU WAS WRONG BOUT DEM MAVS
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

There's an oak tree on my block that's a tougher defender than Dampier was.

You might as well say that the Cowboys have a great quarterback in Romo because he's better and tougher than Anthony Wright.




If you can't see how Chandler made the team tougher, not just personality wise, but actual on court performance wise, then you really are delusional.

quote:

He's always been able to rebound because he's 7' tall. He just hasn't always done it.


WTF man. He has averaged 10+ rebounds a game in the playoffs for his entire career. It wasn't a swich he just turned on for the last 3 games of the finals.

quote:

Who the hell was talking about how good the Dallas defense was?


No one. No one was saying it was bad or going to keep them from winning a title either.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37831 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

Most of this thread happened in the first three games of the series, when the Mavs played like pussies and only controlled four of the first 144 minutes of the series.


Which pussies won game two in Miami?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

If you can't see how Chandler made the team tougher, not just personality wise, but actual on court performance wise, then you really are delusional.
Then call me delusional. That dude is a huge pussy.
quote:

WTF man. He has averaged 10+ rebounds a game in the playoffs for his entire career. It wasn't a swich he just turned on for the last 3 games of the finals.
Then it was a switch he turned OFF for the rest of the playoffs until the 2nd half of the Finals.
quote:

No one was saying it was bad or going to keep them from winning a title either.
True--they were too busy blaming the refs.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

Then it was a switch he turned OFF for the rest of the playoffs until the 2nd half of the Finals.


Like I pointed out earlier, he had a bad rebounding series against the Thunder. He rebounded well in the Portland series. He rebounded well in the Lakers series. He rebounded well in the 1st 3 games against Miami. What are you not comprehending about this? How do you ignore that he had more rebounds in games 1-3 than in games 4-6?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 10:08 pm to
Jesus Christ, they won, nobocy cares what some anonymous message board douche thinks about their "softness".
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37831 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 10:17 pm to
Dude you started an asinine thread. You can write a fukn thesis about why you're right if you like. Just make sure the last sentence is "I'm dead wrong and will not admit it because I'm a pussy".
Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1809 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 10:46 pm to
xiv, the reason this thread is indefensible and ignorant is that you disregarded Dallas' playoff run up to the Finals. Did you watch the LA series? What about the OKC series? Is it really shocking that Dallas' role players shot the ball so well? Dallas is a unique team that has a player who has to be double teamed and the surround him with great shooters who do a great job of moving the ball.

Another problem I have with this thread is that you acted like Dallas was run out of the gym in game 1 and game 3. They lost game 1 by 8 with LeBron shooting out of his mind and they lost by 2 in game 3. Let's not forget that Dallas was up by 9 with 2 minutes left in the first half in game 3. Then you come on here spewing all of this negative, biased crap about how soft Dallas is. What happens next? Tyson Chandler comes out in game 4 and does what he did all season and comes up with a huge double double and Dirk continued to dominate Wade and LeBron in the fourth quarters. You can justify this asinine thread all you want but it won't change the fact that it is one of the most ignorant threads I have seen on this board in a long, long time.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Like I pointed out earlier, he had a bad rebounding series against the Thunder. He rebounded well in the Portland series. He rebounded well in the Lakers series. He rebounded well in the 1st 3 games against Miami. What are you not comprehending about this?
7 a game. Your subjective labels of "bad" and "well" don't add up to the fact that he averaged three fewer boards per game during the playoffs as of last week.
quote:

What are you not comprehending about this? How do you ignore that he had more rebounds in games 1-3 than in games 4-6?
Perhaps I'm counting wrong, but I just researched, and much to my surprise, it appears he had the exact same amount of rebounds in the first three games as he did in the final three games, which would make us both wrong. I still saw him play tougher in the past three games than ever before. I also have 20/10 vision, so it isn't my eyes.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

Dude you started an asinine thread. You can write a fukn thesis about why you're right if you like.
I started a thread about how the Mavs were playing like crap when the Mavs were playing like crap. Does the fact that the Mavs started playing like tits afterwards change the fact that the Mavs at first played like crap?
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 11:10 pm to
quote:

Is it really shocking that Dallas' role players shot the ball so well?
I said in another thread a couple days ago that it wasn't a fluke that they shot 68% from downtown in game 5 because they do that once every couple weeks (some called it a fluke), but it would be seriously amazing if they did it two games in a row vs. a defense like Miami's, and they did just that. Shocking? Maybe that's not the right word, but it's pretty close. I've never seen ANY team shoot that well for two straight games.
quote:

Another problem I have with this thread is that you acted like Dallas was run out of the gym in game 1 and game 3.
No sir. I didn't. I have been perfectly clear about this: The first four games were lost by the losing team more than won by the winning team (I even started a thread over it). Miami played subpar ball in games 1 through 3; luckily for them, the Mavs played like poons.
quote:

Then you come on here spewing all of this negative, biased crap about how soft Dallas is.
You make it sound like I just started doing it. Dallas played like pussies for nearly a decade, and I've been pointing it out for years.
quote:

Tyson Chandler comes out in game 4 and does what he did all season and comes up with a huge double double and Dirk continued to dominate Wade and LeBron in the fourth quarters.
Alright, guys, what part aren't you getting? Dallas played like shite in games 1thru3, and then I started this thread about how Dallas played like shite in games 1thru3.

Stay with me here....

THEN Dallas played really well in games 4thru6 and won the title because of how awesome they played.

But get this....

Their performance in games 4thru6 have NOTHING TO DO WITH their performance in games 1thru3.

Does everybody understand how this works? If you're still confused about this, raise your hand.
quote:

You can justify this asinine thread all you want but it won't change the fact that it is one of the most ignorant threads I have seen on this board in a long, long time.
Sorry, it doesn't work, no matter how many of you do it. If I started this thread yesterday, then you'd have a point. But, I didn't. I started a thread about the Mavs playing like pussies when the Mavs were playing like pussies. If you don't get it, I don't know what else to tell you.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 6/13/11 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

7 a game. Your subjective labels of "bad" and "well" don't add up to the fact that he averaged three fewer boards per game during the playoffs as of last week


No you aren't getting it. Take the OKC series away and he averaged 9.5 rebounds a game in the playoffs. You are basically saying he didn't rebound well the entire playoffs because his playoff average wasn't where it normally is. That is a horribly flawed argument when you are only dealing with 15 games.

quote:

Perhaps I'm counting wrong, but I just researched, and much to my surprise, it appears he had the exact same amount of rebounds in the first three games as he did in the final three games, which would make us both wrong. I still saw him play tougher in the past three games than ever before. I also have 20/10 vision, so it isn't my eyes.


LINK

Games 1-3 rebound totals: 8-11-11 = 30.
Games 4-6 rebound totals: 11-6-11 = 28.

Apparently your eyes suck.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 12:27 am to
quote:

No you aren't getting it. Take the OKC series away
No. It counts just as much as everything else. A friend of mine told me once, "If you take away all the Beatles songs, Paul McCartney really isn't that great," and I'm like, "Yeah, but he was still in the Beatles."

Sure, take away the OKC series, and you can spin your selective statistics any way you want, but the OKC series existed just as much as any.
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37831 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 7:54 am to
Soft arse finals' MVP that can't rebound. All he does is shoot? All he does is win.

Posted by ThePistol
Lafayette, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1809 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Dallas played like shite in games 1thru3, and then I started this thread about how Dallas played like shite in games 1thru3.


They lost by 8 on the road with LeBron shooting out of his mind (talk about flukes). Then, they win on the road and lose by 2 at home with a shot to tie or win at the end. They were not playing like shite or soft. This was a team that had won their first round series 4-2, swept the defending champs 4-0 in embarrasing fashion, and then handled OKC in the confrence finals 4-1. The reason this thread was asinine is because through three games this NBA finals was shaping up to be epic with both teams breezing their way through their respective confrence brackets. Dallas lost game 1 and then wins game 2, they lose game 3 (by 2) and then you come on here with this garbage. It had to be fueled by hate for the Mavericks or simple ignorance. It's that simple.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51775 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 8:20 am to
To xiv,

Let's just settle this:

You need help. Maybe Xanax. Probably both.

Let it go.

You're welcome.



This post was edited on 6/14/11 at 8:21 am
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34212 posts
Posted on 6/14/11 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Dude you started an asinine thread. You can write a fukn thesis about why you're right if you like. Just make sure the last sentence is "I'm dead wrong and will not admit it because I'm a pussy".

this
Jump to page
Page First 15 16 17 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 17 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram