- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How is this CFP any better than the BCS??
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:42 pm to tiger91
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:42 pm to tiger91
To answer your question directly, this committee probably knows their shite way better than the Coaches' and Harris polls did, and they are also individually subject to much more scrutiny.
That said, the BCS placed significant weight on unbiased, comprehensive math. Be-all, end-all? No, but nothing anyone says will convince me that democracy is a better way to decide these things than is a mathematical formula or series thereof.
That said, the BCS placed significant weight on unbiased, comprehensive math. Be-all, end-all? No, but nothing anyone says will convince me that democracy is a better way to decide these things than is a mathematical formula or series thereof.
0
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:42 pm to Box Geauxrilla
quote:
I think the BCS system and then take the top 4 teams for a playoff would have been ideal.
It's infuriating that they didn't just do this.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:42 pm to TigerPepper
quote:No, that's a god-awful, unreasonable, unrealistic idea.
Make the power 5 conferences ALL have championship games, take the winners of those, 3 at large or Wild Card teams and be done. Better than the crap we have right now.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:44 pm to loweralabamatrojan
quote:Better record, tougher schedule, higher margin of victory. Geaux Tigers.
This. The BCS was ridiculously bad.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:45 pm to ballscaster
It still looks like the earlier you lose,the better off you are. It's like they forget about the old losses
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:47 pm to Cs
quote:
Posted by Cs on 11/10/15 at 6:25 pm to CalTiger53 At least the BCS formula contained an iota of objectivity. The committee rankings are a complete joke.
The criteria that went into the diffenent computer pills was subjective....but it was defined before the season and applied equally.
The committee is a freaking joke.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:57 pm to tiger91
Scheduling of the current Top 4:
#1 Clemson: Beat #4 Notre Dame, Beat #16 Florida State, May Face #23 North Carolina
#2 Alabama: Beat #9 LSU, Beat #25 Wisconsin, Will Play #17 Miss. St., May Face #11 Florida
#3 Ohio State: Will Play #13 Michigan State, Will Play #14 Michigan, May Play #5 Iowa
#4 Notre Dame: Loss to #1 Clemson, Beat #20 Navy, Beat #22 Temple, Will Play #7 Stanford
Total Games Played Against the Top 25: 11 (14 possible)
Total Games Played vs Non-Power 5 Conferences: 11 (Clemson - 2, Alabama - 3, Ohio State - 3, Notre Dame - 3)
I'm all for giving cupcake schools their funding, but when the number of games vs Top 25 schools is so close to the number of cupcakes, you have to wonder.
#1 Clemson: Beat #4 Notre Dame, Beat #16 Florida State, May Face #23 North Carolina
#2 Alabama: Beat #9 LSU, Beat #25 Wisconsin, Will Play #17 Miss. St., May Face #11 Florida
#3 Ohio State: Will Play #13 Michigan State, Will Play #14 Michigan, May Play #5 Iowa
#4 Notre Dame: Loss to #1 Clemson, Beat #20 Navy, Beat #22 Temple, Will Play #7 Stanford
Total Games Played Against the Top 25: 11 (14 possible)
Total Games Played vs Non-Power 5 Conferences: 11 (Clemson - 2, Alabama - 3, Ohio State - 3, Notre Dame - 3)
I'm all for giving cupcake schools their funding, but when the number of games vs Top 25 schools is so close to the number of cupcakes, you have to wonder.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:03 pm to tiger91
It's better in that four teams have a legitimate shot at winning.
Unless you're talking the way the teams are decided. That would be a separate issue which I could agree with, though I'm not opposed to what we have now.
Unless you're talking the way the teams are decided. That would be a separate issue which I could agree with, though I'm not opposed to what we have now.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 7:10 pm to GoldenGuy
quote:Each team has played many more games than this. They all count.
Scheduling of the current Top 4:
#1 Clemson: Beat #4 Notre Dame, Beat #16 Florida State, May Face #23 North Carolina
#2 Alabama: Beat #9 LSU, Beat #25 Wisconsin, Will Play #17 Miss. St., May Face #11 Florida
#3 Ohio State: Will Play #13 Michigan State, Will Play #14 Michigan, May Play #5 Iowa
#4 Notre Dame: Loss to #1 Clemson, Beat #20 Navy, Beat #22 Temple, Will Play #7 Stanford
Total Games Played Against the Top 25: 11 (14 possible)
Total Games Played vs Non-Power 5 Conferences: 11 (Clemson - 2, Alabama - 3, Ohio State - 3, Notre Dame - 3)
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:20 pm to tiger91
LSU fans bitching because they shite the bed against Bama...again. 2 SEC teams aren't getting in. If it ends up Bama vs Florida in Atlanta the winner will get in and loser will be bumped.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:22 pm to Chillini
quote:Hail State. Go Noles.
LSU fans bitching because they shite the bed against Bama...again. 2 SEC teams aren't getting in. If it ends up Bama vs Florida in Atlanta the winner will get in and loser will be bumped.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:32 pm to Chillini
quote:
LSU fans bitching because they shite the bed against Bama...again. 2 SEC teams aren't getting in. If it ends up Bama vs Florida in Atlanta the winner will get in and loser will be bumped.
Definitely not bitching. Truly wondering after the commentators comment about not putting 2 teams from the same conference to basically "share the wealth" being stupid ... even if the 2 teams are 2 of the 4 most deserving.
Also, isn't there the possibility of ie a player who was out due to injury so they lost but MAY have won and comes back later in the season and therefore get the benefit of the doubt?? Their lost can be "excused"? How does that fly?
I just think that there's the huge possibility of bias even though they're supposed to be professionals. It's human nature.
Again so NOT griping about LSUs ranking.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:41 pm to tiger91
quote:
Also, isn't there the possibility of ie a player who was out due to injury so they lost but MAY have won and comes back later in the season and therefore get the benefit of the doubt?? Their lost can be "excused"? How does that fly?
This should not matter one bit. Football is a team sport. Injuries happen and it doesn't change what a team accomplished before or can accomplish going forward. Look at Ohio State last year or the QB at Baylor stepping in for a great performance last week.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:47 pm to Chillini
Oh I know but I seem to recall there being "talk" about that being able to be used by the committee when making the rankings. I could be wrong.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:51 pm to tiger91
The douche that made that comment isn't on the committee.
The guy who IS on the committee clearly said that ND was where they are in the rankings partly due to what they've done all while having injuries to important position players.
This IS you upset that LSU shite the bed, once again. Be honest with yourself.
The guy who IS on the committee clearly said that ND was where they are in the rankings partly due to what they've done all while having injuries to important position players.
This IS you upset that LSU shite the bed, once again. Be honest with yourself.
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:53 pm to tiger91
You definitely aren't wrong. I've heard that talk before as well. All it should come down to is A) Who you beat B) How you beat them and C) Who you lost to. The rest is just bullshite talking points for "analysts"
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:57 pm to tiger91
I just found out tonight that 2 committee members are assigned to each conference.
quote:
@BryanDFischer: Worth noting that Condoleezza Rice and Bobby Johnson are the two committee members assigned to the Big 12.
quote:This makes no goddamn sense to me.
@BryanDFischer: Tom Osborne and Condoleezza Rice are assigned to the American. Four AAC teams in the top 25.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:57 pm to NashBamaFan
quote:
NashBamaFan
I don't do this often as I like to think of myself as a lady but
. For the record, I'm an LSU fan who would take Saban back. Do I ever pull for Bama? Hell no. But do I admit when my team gets beat? Absolutely. And did we get beat on Saturday. Presumptuous Gump.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:58 pm to tiger91
quote:
I'm an LSU fan who would take Saban back.
oh for crying out loud, go back to the rant
Posted on 11/10/15 at 8:59 pm to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:I agree. This committee BS is a joke
Just should have kept the BCS and the top 4 made the playoffs
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News