re: How can McQueary live with himself

quote:

---

My "argument" is about the people equating McQueary to Sandusky it's just absurd. And everyone here who say's they'd 100% without a doubt physically intervene in a situation like that...i hope you never are in a situation like that. But if you are i pray to god you do do something

---

Every single rape that happened after that situation could have been stopped if McQuery had done something. Whether its beat him to a pulp go to the police whatever. Instead Mcquery did essentially nothing and most likely was put on a fast track because of that. He profited off kids being raped. By not doing anything he was basically driving kids and dropping them off at that despicable mans house. Everyone involved in this is evil pure evil. A man was using a childrens charity as a means to fuel his despicable habit and they did nothing. There are few things if anything that can be lower than that.

The only issue is that you brought up the question, what if the kid was enjoying it?


Want to talk about a hypocrite?


If you're in a damn court room, and a lawyer ask your daughter or a witness if your kid was enjoying it, would you stay calm?

quote:

---

No it damn well isnt. You are a sick person. Think about what you just said.

---

It is actually whether you like it or not.

quote:

---

frick NO IT ISNT. A ten year old CAN NOT CONSENT. IT CANNOT BE CONSENSUAL IN NATURE. THEY DONT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING AND WHY THIS PERSON THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO LISTEN AND OBEY TO IS TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THEM! How does your twisted mind not understand that?

---

Dude I get all that. Honestly I do. Getting past that, I don't understand the full legal system but I think sometimes they do distinguish between aggravated rape and statutory rape... not sure.

Would you clowns lay off of Chad? If you people had any reading comprehension at all, you would have seen that Chad said it doesn't make it any more or less apprehensible if the kid was resisting it. He was just asking a mere question of fact to get a better idea of what happened.

Obviously, a sexually assault of a 10 year old boy can not be defended. But should it not even be investigated whether the boy was forcefully raped, conned by an older man in a position of power, or touched inappropriately with his clothes still on? All 3 of those are still disgusting actions and I think Chad knows that. He was just asking what the actual facts are because when you are discussing matters of fact, the facts are what matters. Until then, it's just unsubstantiated conjecture.

Speedy is the real worthless POS. He had the gaul to call Chad out for asking a question of fact, but was then found to have called an 11 year old girl who was raped a whore in another thread. That is pathetic, Speedy.

And I am not one to stick up for Chad. We have butted heads once in another thread. But he has done nothing wrong in this thread.

Chad, the reaction should be the same by the adult whether or not the kid was fighting or enjoying it.

basically if you see a boy getting nailed in the shower the protocol is....
a) if he seems to be enjoying it wait for the old man to finish up and then pull him aside and say "hey its totally not cool to bang little boys man. I get he was totally asking for it, but not cool man"
b) if there's a struggle then you need to step in immediately.

quote:

---

Chad, the reaction should be the same by the adult whether or not the kid was fighting or enjoying it.

---

The only acceptable response to what Chad said in here.

I get what Chad was trying to say even thought it was pointless and unnecessarily controversial (how the frick do we know what the kid's reaction was?).

However, asking the question in reference to McQueary's response is missing the point by miles.

I'd rather have an angry 10 yr old on my hands (in the absolutely absurd situation that it was 'consensual') than just continue to allow something like that to happen.

For some reason I have more questions about McQueary than anyone else in this scenario. I honestly think he should go to jail for a long time.

Good point. He could've been telling anyone who would've listen, only to be told to shut up... Including the police.