- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Georgia’s NIL Lawsuit vs Ex LB a Sign of the Times in College Athletics?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:54 pm to New Money
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:54 pm to New Money
Okay? That was the rules of the organization. If Gurley wanted to sell jerseys, go sell jerseys. But you can't play football within the confines of the NCAA. Why are you against freedom of choice?
Besides, there was absolutely no market for Gurley's services without the NCAA or University of Georgia. None.
Besides, there was absolutely no market for Gurley's services without the NCAA or University of Georgia. None.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 9:59 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Don't care, he signed and took the money. Love it
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:24 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
UGAA argues that under the NIL deal’s liquidated damages clause, Wilson, as the licensor, must pay all remaining license fees that would have been payable. The remaining value, according to court filings, is $390,000.
This is the only interesting part of the lawsuit. I bet if it goes to court this part of the liquidated damages is set aside by the court as being unreasonable because it seems it’s pretty clear it’s intended as punitive damages.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:29 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
A university, through its athletic association, is suing a former student athlete who transferred for reneging on his NIL deal.
Good.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:31 pm to ragincajun03
If you sign the contract then you’re a big boy and you have to fulfill it.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 7:03 am to ragincajun03
quote:
UGAA argues that under the NIL deal’s liquidated damages clause, Wilson, as the licensor, must pay all remaining license fees that would have been payable. The remaining value, according to court filings, is $390,000.
Not a lawyer, but I think Georgia loses this one unless they can prove the damages.
ETA: I think I read that penalty clauses aren't allowed so they tied a penalty amount under liquidated damages.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 7:10 am
Popular
Back to top

0





