- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FSU- what a joke.. WF, Illinois, Clemson, Utah, WV and BC
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:02 am
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:02 am
You can't tell me all those teams deserved to be higher seeds than LSU. I know Utah beat the Tigers(early in the year), but look what happened after that.
3
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:18 am to Yellowjacket
Utah beat LSU by 30
Wake also deserved to be higher
Wake also deserved to be higher
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:20 am to LordoftheManor
Like I said, earlier in the season. How can you say Wake deserved to be higher?
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:22 am to Yellowjacket
Wake actually beat people worth a frick....
Quit being so stupid/biased. Seeding is chosen from resumes, and all of those teams had better resumes than LSU.
Quit being so stupid/biased. Seeding is chosen from resumes, and all of those teams had better resumes than LSU.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 8:26 am to Charles Bronson
Didn't realize I was Stupid and definitely not biased, just stating a truthful fact.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:48 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
Didn't realize I was Stupid and definitely not biased, just stating a truthful fact.
If you think you were stating a "truthful fact," then you're more stupid than we originally thought.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:52 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
How can you say Wake deserved to be higher?
quality wins?
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:53 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
How can you say Wake deserved to be higher?
They were #1 at one point in the season. And they played in the ACC.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:53 am to Hot Carl
LSU deserves to be ahead of all those teams.
This post was edited on 3/21/09 at 9:55 am
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:57 am to dukke v
Yeah but look how the ACC is performing now. I know everybody is saying the SEC was down this year but Auburn got hot at the end of the year and deserved to make it and I think Florida could have played well to.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 9:59 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
LSU deserves to be ahead of all those teams.
I disagree. However, that is what we call an "opinion." Not a "truthful fact."
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:00 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
Yeah but look how the ACC is performing now. I know everybody is saying the SEC was down this year but Auburn got hot at the end of the year and deserved to make it and I think Florida could have played well to
frick the people who say Auburn deserved to get in. I hate "such & such a team got hot" talk. Those teams NEVER survive more than 2 games in the tourney. They don't deserve it. I called it when Miss State got in. People were calling the upset. I said "this team is like Georgia was last year". BOOM! fricking popped by 13 in the first round. Florida I'm more inclined to agree with. But they weren't strong enough in terms of a resume. I can't buy this.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:03 am to Hot Carl
Thank you Hot Carl for letting me know that was an opinion.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:09 am to Yellowjacket
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:09 am to Yellowjacket
WF - deserved a 4, even though they hit their peak in January
Illinois - a 7 seed playing as a 5. Awful offensive team.
Clemson - a 7 was about right. They beat Duke by 30 points. Oliver Purnell, in the tourney however, is a joke.
Utah - Meh. Beat LSU by 30...so what...pretty overrated. 6 or 7.
WV - Plays as good as a 4 and as bad as an NIT team. Yesterday, the latter was true. They got a big reward for winning a Big East tourney game against a very "we don't really need this game" Pitt.
BC - already said it...worst seeding job the committee did since '06 Tennessee.
Illinois - a 7 seed playing as a 5. Awful offensive team.
Clemson - a 7 was about right. They beat Duke by 30 points. Oliver Purnell, in the tourney however, is a joke.
Utah - Meh. Beat LSU by 30...so what...pretty overrated. 6 or 7.
WV - Plays as good as a 4 and as bad as an NIT team. Yesterday, the latter was true. They got a big reward for winning a Big East tourney game against a very "we don't really need this game" Pitt.
BC - already said it...worst seeding job the committee did since '06 Tennessee.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:10 am to Hot Carl
I was being a smart arse, but it's all good. 
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:15 am to Yellowjacket
quote:3-4 in the Big Dance; SEC is 1-2.
Yeah but look how the ACC is performing now.
LSU was seeded somewhat fairly, and so were the others.
All the teams you mention in this thread have 2-3 more losses than LSU against much tougher schedules.
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:17 am to Yellowjacket
Just because those teams lost you think that LSU deserved to be seeded ahead of them? Any of those teams could have handled us at any given time
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:17 am to xiv
quote:
All the teams you mention in this thread have 2-3 more losses than LSU against much tougher schedules.
And we see where that got em!
Posted on 3/21/09 at 10:50 am to Yellowjacket
quote:
I was being a smart arse, but it's all good.
So was I. Hook e'm.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News