- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ESPN MVP Poll: Wentz is the current frontrunner
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:31 am to Boomshockalocka
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:31 am to Boomshockalocka
quote:
Why you gonna use a hypothetical of what player do we think has the worst backups? Instead of let’s look at the readily available data showing what actually happened for an award like MVP. It’s mind boggling.
It’s fitting that you posted this in response to yourself, since you’re the one who brought up McCown and Chase Daniel. I just threw in Cassel and Flynn to show you that your argument was stupid.
1
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:32 am to TotesMcGotes
You are the one with the wrong defintion of mvp. It’s LEAGUE MVP. What player is most valuable to the league that year. Sorry but if a guy is on a .500 squad and gets hurt and his team loses out that is not of importance to the league as a whole that year.
The award hasn’t ever been what player is most valuable to his own team.
The MVP voting results have proven this time and time again.
The award hasn’t ever been what player is most valuable to his own team.
The MVP voting results have proven this time and time again.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:41 am to TotesMcGotes
Not as stupid as you using your imagination to come up with how someone’s backup would play to decide who is the league MVP.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:44 am to Boomshockalocka
Adrian Peterson won the award in 2012 and the Vikings were 10-6. 12 other teams were equal or better than that. Why did he win when other teams did better than the Vikings?
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:48 am to TotesMcGotes
You know you getting it handed to you when you make up arguments. 
We never said you had to be on the best team. We said elite player in one of the best teams.
You make up something I said more than once a page. Give it up bro.
We never said you had to be on the best team. We said elite player in one of the best teams.
You make up something I said more than once a page. Give it up bro.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 11:57 am to TotesMcGotes
quote:
Why did he win when other teams did better than the Vikings?
Because he came within a hair's breadth of breaking Eric Dickerson's record for most rushing yards in a season.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:00 pm to Boomshockalocka
Right. And he was an elite player on a middle-of-the-pack squad. 12 teams were equal or better.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:02 pm to RollTide1987
Sorry, bro. He wasn’t on one of the best teams. Disqualified.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:03 pm to TotesMcGotes
Dud you gotta go back 5 years to find something than “might be” an exception to what I’m saying. Clearly 10-6 is good enough. How many more years back behind Peterson’s MVP year do you have to go to find a team that you think isn’t good enough to fit my criteria. 
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:04 pm to Boomshockalocka
So, 10-6 is good enough. Is 9-7?
Where is the line drawn? How is 10-6 one of the best teams, and who decides that?
Where is the line drawn? How is 10-6 one of the best teams, and who decides that?
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:07 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
How is 10-6 one of the best teams, and who decides that?
T-9TH best record in the nfl that year..lol
But he gets pissed off about Westbrook winning mvp last year because it wasn't a top seed.
This post was edited on 11/23/17 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:11 pm to htran90
We think a lot of this animosity is poorly-veiled Westbrook criticism.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:12 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
my criteria
This is comical....
BTW
Westbrook>>>>>>>>>>> Harden.........
There is ZERO debate...........
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:12 pm to TotesMcGotes
I don’t draw the line. The voters do. You clearly don’t get it. Thinking the MVP is who means the most to their team when anybody can see that dog don’t hunt. Safe to say we haven’t seen many 9-7 MVP winners.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:14 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
You clearly don’t get it.
NO you don't get it... Who would have A better record???
The Rockets without Harden or the Thunder without Westbrook?????????
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:15 pm to htran90
Hey tranny, you simp our criteria doesn’t change. No matter the sport. The year. Whatever.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:16 pm to dukke v
I hate to cross my picket lines here, but Harden is substantially better than Westbrook. But that’s neither here nor there.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:17 pm to dukke v
Who is better the thunder without weatbrook. Or 6ers without embiid?
Embiid is mvp then right.
Embiid is mvp then right.
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:17 pm to TotesMcGotes
quote:
I hate to cross my picket lines here, but Harden is substantially better than Westbrook
Based on what????
Ill play.......
Posted on 11/23/17 at 12:19 pm to dukke v
Efficiency, team success, individual stats, ability to make teammates better.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News