Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually think the Angels are back

Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:25 am to
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Consider this, the Rangers have not lost a single away series this year


I would consider it if it were true.

Go look at that series at wrigley and tell me what happened in the makeup game.
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:26 am to
The Angels aren't as bad as they have been playing, but that pitching staff is atrociuos.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

The Angels aren't as bad as they have been playing, but that pitching staff is atrociuos


when does (or did) weaver come back
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Go look at that series at wrigley and tell me what happened in the makeup game.


I stand corrected, but only kinda.

If you consider a series to be consecutive games in a venue, they still haven't lost one.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
64025 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:28 am to
quote:

The Angels aren't as bad as they have been playing, but that pitching staff is atrociuos.

I agree.

I was trying to bring rational thought into the thread, but trying to do that around here is a fruitless endeavor most of the time
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 11:32 am
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:30 am to
Comes back this week. That should help somewhat. But they are still going to have JEROME WILLIAMS starting 32 games.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:32 am to
quote:

You are aware those rookie starters are not permenantly in the rotation, right?

Yep. I'm also aware that baseball teams go through feast and famine times during a long season and the rangers and Angels are both more likely to move together than apart in the standings.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Comes back this week. That should help somewhat. But they are still going to have JEROME WILLIAMS starting 32 games.


Admittedly I do not follow the AL, so forgive my ignorance and it's not like Harren has been doing great for the nats but if their staff was this bad why didn't they option him, and why were they tryign to trade him for carlos marmol?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Right now, the Rangers are on pace for 103 wins.
Playing the 2nd easiest schedule in baseball to date. Series with Boston, NYY, Detroit, Cincy, Cleveland, St. Louis and Baltimore will likely bring the Rangers down a bit by the middle of July.

Although, the Angles have struggled with a fairly easy schedule as well. I just think they are playing well below where they should while the Rangers are playing slightly above where they should.

I think the Rangers will win the division, but I also think the Angels will get back in the race and make it competitive.
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:38 am to
Rangers are straight beasts...

They are able to fill their rotation with legit guys even though everyone is injured. Their bullpen is superb and their offense will continue to be a juggernaut if Moreland continues his hot pace.

Haren was told to move on because his velo dipped below 90 and he would cost 10 million a year.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Haren was told to move on because his velo dipped below 90 and he would cost 10 million a year.


And the cubs didn't trade becuase he had a bad hip, i get all that. This isn't about saying harren is good, but with as bad of a staff as everyone makes it out to be, holding onto harren might have been the better move.
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:46 am to
More than likely. I would much rather have whatever Haren had to give me over shitty arse Joe Blanton
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:56 am to
quote:

But they are still going to have JEROME WILLIAMS starting 32 games


You mean the Jerome Williams that is 3-1 with a 2.53 ERA, .217 BAA, and 1.11 WHIP???

Of all the issues with the rotation, Williams is not at the top of my concerns.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 11:57 am to
Considering Haren is struggling in the NL (5.54ERA) he and Blanton are probably a wash right now. If Angels offense gets going Blanton with 4.50-5.00 ERA should win 12 games
This post was edited on 5/24/13 at 11:58 am
Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 12:02 pm to
Jerome Williams is not good. He would be ok as a low leverage middle reliever, but if the Angels leave him in the rotation he will get killed.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 12:05 pm to
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

Jerome Williams is not good. He would be ok as a low leverage middle reliever, but if the Angels leave him in the rotation he will get killed.



Well, thus far that is not true. Who would you rather in the rotation, Blanton or Williams?

Posted by schlow mo
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2010
5245 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 12:07 pm to
Neither, they are both fricking terrible.

Their only hope is Trout stays hot and Albert and Hamilton catch fire.

Their offense should be great, but the rotation after Weaver and Wilson is an embarrassment.
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Neither, they are both fricking terrible.



Okay dude. Williams has been more than serviceable.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 5/24/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Playing the 2nd easiest schedule in baseball to date. Series with Boston, NYY, Detroit, Cincy, Cleveland, St. Louis and Baltimore will likely bring the Rangers down a bit by the middle of July.

The Angels haven't exactly been playing the hardest schedule in the MLB. And they still have one of the weakest bullpens and starting rotations in the Majors.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram