- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cubs @ Astros Game Thread
Posted on 4/8/09 at 7:43 am to TigerPhan27
Posted on 4/8/09 at 7:43 am to TigerPhan27
There's a lot of construction just 2-3 blocks away from Minute Maid, might push the illegal count up to about 7,000-8,000. And it is game and a meal for $10 night. 
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:26 pm to TigerPhan27
Dude it's PECOTA, not PETCOTA. I was making a joke in the last thread just like the one MSU and I made the last time you called it PETCOTA in your thread about the Astros. And it is stupid to say they should have won this amount of games because of expectations based on run differential. In the grand scheme of things that doesn't mean anything. They won 86 games last year which is all that matters. And has Drayton been wrong in deciding to putt the trigger with any of the mid season moves that have been made? In 04 they traded for Carlos Beltran which helped them make the run to the 04 playoffs In 06 they made a deal for Aubrey Huff which filled a need at 3rd and OF cause both Jason Lane and Morgan Ensberg had been playing like shite. This move also gave them a run at the division title finishing a game out of first. 2007 was more out of necessity than anything else since Aubrey signed with BAL in the off season they were forced to give Morgan another shot at 3rd to which he sucked dick again. They decided it was time to trade him to SD and picked up Ty for a mid reliever from Tampa. And finally last year with LaTroy and Randy giving them a pitching boost to be in the WC hunt until Hurricane Ike. Every year besides 07 was a move that boosted them to either make the playoffs or make a push to be there till the end. I would much rather my owner be someone who is willing to pull the trigger and wants a competitive team on the field every year than one who is passive and never wants to make a move.
I didn't say you don't know baseball. I actually think the contrary as far as MLB as a whole. I said you know shite about the Astros which you have proven with most of your comments.
quote:
And it really doesn't bother me that you think I know little about baseball. It's the stance I would expect one to take when someone talks about their team negatively. No worries
I didn't say you don't know baseball. I actually think the contrary as far as MLB as a whole. I said you know shite about the Astros which you have proven with most of your comments.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:28 pm to TEXASTIGER22
sorry I don't think the Astros are good. I guess I just don't know shite about the astros. I'm sure they will win 90 games this season. Good luck in the playoffs 
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:38 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
sorry I don't think the Astros are good. I guess I just don't know shite about the astros. I'm sure they will win 90 games this season. Good luck in the playoffs
Has nothing to do with you not thinking the Astros are going to be good. I have said every time asked that I think they will fall short of the playoffs and win around 80 games. You have made it clear that they are a shite team who will finish 5th in the division and
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:47 pm to TEXASTIGER22
quote:
And it is stupid to say they should have won this amount of games because of expectations based on run differential. In the grand scheme of things that doesn't mean anything. They won 86 games last year which is all that matters.
But... didn't you just argue that they're basically the same team as last year, minus Wigginton and Wolf?
So the fact that they were outscored by 31 runs last season and then lost two big pieces is a good thing for this season?
No... that bodes ill for the Astros, I'm afraid. They can maybe hang around the .500 mark, but they aren't going to have similar luck as last season.
Teams shouldn't finish over .500 with a run differential that bad. No one else did it last season... two teams did in 2007. The Mariners (who everybody was falsely pumped about in 2008, only to collapse and lose 100 games) and the Diamondbacks, who won the NL West with a 90-72 record despite a -20 run differential. They went on to improve to a +14 run differential in 2008, but despite a 34-run swing, only finished 82-80.
You can go back and look... it's pretty rare for a team to finish above .500 with a negative differential... even more rare for that team to then follow up with a similar season.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:47 pm to TEXASTIGER22
They have no pitching behind Oswalt and he's on a downslide. Wandy is too inconsistent. Not enough hitting either. They won't sniff the playoffs
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:51 pm to TEXASTIGER22
No website predicted anything. Based on their run differential they should have won a certain amount of games. It really has nothing to do with last year as much as it does predicting what will happen going forward. You keep saying it's the same team so of course they will be the same. Well it's the same old team that wasn't good for 75% of the season last year and caught fire for a little stretch to make their season respectable. Besides Lee, Berkman and Pence you are counting on Pudge and Tejada to be run producers which I don't think they are anymore at this stage in their careers. But it's not even the average lineup that's the issue. You have a bad rotation. The bullpen is fine for the most part except thinking that Latroy Hawkins will be a viable setup man is pretty risky IMO.
Anyway I don't think the Cubs are going to run away with the division as I've stated their question marks. I just don't see the Astros being in the mix. I really don't think anyone does so it's odd that you choose to take issue with me saying what basically everyone else is. Maybe they will shock the world who knows
Anyway I don't think the Cubs are going to run away with the division as I've stated their question marks. I just don't see the Astros being in the mix. I really don't think anyone does so it's odd that you choose to take issue with me saying what basically everyone else is. Maybe they will shock the world who knows
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:53 pm to MrKennedy
Teams shouldn't finish over .500 with a run differential that bad. No one else did it last season... two teams did in 2007. The Mariners (who everybody was falsely pumped about in 2008, only to collapse and lose 100 games) and the Diamondbacks, who won the NL West with a 90-72 record despite a -20 run differential. They went on to improve to a +14 run differential in 2008, but despite a 34-run swing, only finished 82-80.
You can go back and look... it's pretty rare for a team to finish above .500 with a negative differential... even more rare for that team to then follow up with a similar season.
This is exactly the point. The pythagorean expectation is a good indicator for what will happen the following year not the year previous.
You can go back and look... it's pretty rare for a team to finish above .500 with a negative differential... even more rare for that team to then follow up with a similar season.
This is exactly the point. The pythagorean expectation is a good indicator for what will happen the following year not the year previous.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 2:58 pm to bwallcubfan
quote:
Oswalt and he's on a downslide.
this was said last year too after his slow start, he'll still win over half of his starts and have a sub 3.5 ERA like he has for the last 10 years.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:01 pm to MrKennedy
quote:
But... didn't you just argue that they're basically the same team as last year, minus Wigginton and Wolf?
So the fact that they were outscored by 31 runs last season and then lost two big pieces is a good thing for this season?
They lost two pieces but they also gained pieces in other positions. Catcher was a big negative which they upgraded and with the loss of Wolf
they picked up Hampton. I know I know his injuries and
quote:
They can maybe hang around the .500 mark, but they aren't going to have similar luck as last season.
Yes, they were very lucky to have a hurricane come through the city right in the middle of their playoff push.
quote:
Teams shouldn't finish over .500 with a run differential that bad. No one else did it last season... two teams did in 2007. The Mariners (who everybody was falsely pumped about in 2008, only to collapse and lose 100 games) and the Diamondbacks, who won the NL West with a 90-72 record despite a -20 run differential. They went on to improve to a +14 run differential in 2008, but despite a 34-run swing, only finished 82-80.
They shouldn't I agree but the Astros did. They pulled out a lot of close games, as they have done a good job of in years past as well, to get the wins. Call it luck, call it a fluke, or whatever you want. There was some luck involved but there was also a lot of heart to pull out those wins.
quote:
You can go back and look... it's pretty rare for a team to finish above .500 with a negative differential... even more rare for that team to then follow up with a similar season.
I could care less about what teams did the next year after they finish with a negative run differential. That means absolutely nothing as to what the 2009 Astros are going to do this season
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:01 pm to Boomshockalocka
Boom I need to take this oppourtunity to apoligize for giving you a hard time because of your retardation. If I would have known your back story and how you were mistreated growing up and were abused I would have never started with you. Why didn't you just say your parents sent you to public school in LA to start with? I feel so bad now. Especially since it's holy week.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:02 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:
this was said last year too after his slow start, he'll still win over half of his starts and have a sub 3.5 ERA like he has for the last 10 years.
He can't do it by himself, though... just look at other guys in similar situations like Halladay and Peavy. They're both better than Oswalt, but stuck on crappy or mediocre teams.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:04 pm to TEXASTIGER22
You're saying all this as an act, right?
Like the Skip Bayless of Astros fans... going over the top for the sake of arguing?
Right?
Like the Skip Bayless of Astros fans... going over the top for the sake of arguing?
Right?
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:05 pm to TigerPhan27
all the kids in my town that went to private school drove 30 minutes to get there, and they were the biggest pussies in the neighborhood. my public school education > your private school education..
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:06 pm to MrKennedy
quote:
He can't do it by himself, though... just look at other guys in similar situations like Halladay and Peavy. They're both better than Oswalt, but stuck on crappy or mediocre teams.
I understand and agree, I was addressing the post he made where he said Oswalt was regressing.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:11 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
No website predicted anything. Based on their run differential they should have won a certain amount of games. It really has nothing to do with last year as much as it does predicting what will happen going forward. You keep saying it's the same team so of course they will be the same.
In all fairness you have used to PECOTA argument for how they overachieved last year on more than 1 occasion.
quote:
Well it's the same old team that wasn't good for 75% of the season last year and caught fire for a little stretch to make their season respectable. Besides Lee, Berkman and Pence you are counting on Pudge and Tejada to be run producers which I don't think they are anymore at this stage in their careers.
Pence had a bad year last year which I think will be better this year, i also don't think Bourn will be as bad. Lee had 28 hr's and 100 RBI's in 115 games last year. He was playing well before he got hurt so i'm excited to see what he can do with a full season. I'm not expecting Pudge to be our savior but I am expecting him to be an upgrade offensively over Brad Ausmus or Humberto Quentero.
quote:
But it's not even the average lineup that's the issue. You have a bad rotation. The bullpen is fine for the most part except thinking that Latroy Hawkins will be a viable setup man is pretty risky IMO.
I agree however I think we have an above average bullpen which will get the rotation out of jams just like they did last year and also had one of the best defensive teams statistically in the league last year which will also help the bad rotation. I don't like having LaTroy as a setup man any more than you do but i don't think that will last too long.
quote:
Anyway I don't think the Cubs are going to run away with the division as I've stated their question marks. I just don't see the Astros being in the mix. I really don't think anyone does so it's odd that you choose to take issue with me saying what basically everyone else is. Maybe they will shock the world who knows
Because this is the most resonable statement I have seen you make when talking about the Astros. As I have said before I don't think they will be in the mix to with the division either but I think they have a shot at the WC and whenever I say that I get blasted by 5+ people who try to convince me the Astros are going to be in the cellar. I don't think they will be as bad as most on here seem to try to make me believe.
This post was edited on 4/8/09 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:12 pm to Boomshockalocka
it's ok boom, tell the doctor where they touched you. They can't hurt you anymore. you are safe here.
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:14 pm to TigerPhan27
edited*
This post was edited on 4/8/09 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:15 pm to MrKennedy
quote:
He can't do it by himself, though... just look at other guys in similar situations like Halladay and Peavy.
He didn't do it by himself last year. Astros finished 8th in team pitching in the NL. Not outstanding but certainly not the worst rotation in baseball either
This post was edited on 4/8/09 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 4/8/09 at 3:16 pm to MrKennedy
quote:
You're saying all this as an act, right?
Like the Skip Bayless of Astros fans... going over the top for the sake of arguing?
Right?
You are the one who jumped in to me and Phan's discussion. Who exactly is arguing for the sake of arguin again?
Popular
Back to top


0


