Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

College vs pro football

Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:58 pm
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85051 posts
Posted on 6/15/26 at 11:58 pm
If we can all agree that football players at both levels have only gotten bigger stronger faster over the decades. So how far back would we have to go to see a great modern college football team be able to consistently beat NFL teams? 80s? 70s?
Posted by Combaro01
Member since Mar 2024
216 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 1:57 am to
Even looking back decades, the depth of an NFL roster makes it almost impossible for a college team to win. Great college teams only have a handful of future pros, while every player on an NFL team is a professional. The gap is too massive.
Posted by lsufanva
sandston virginia
Member since Aug 2009
13641 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 6:37 am to
Whenever the lineman went from being 250 lb to 330 lb behemoths with athleticism would be the cutoff. College kids these days would run right through those guys with modern rules. Sure those guys were tough and hard but bigger, faster, better athletes with modern rules would destroy them. Maybe as recent as the 70s. The 70s Steelers with all those Hall of Famers would have issues with the young kids today just based on size, strength and athleticism. DL these days are faster and at times more athletic than wrs of that era. Beating a team consistently that is more athletic, faster and bigger at almost every position is a tough row to hoe no matter how tough and smart you are. That goes for your backyard, hs, college and the pros.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5740 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:46 am to
quote:

If we can all agree that football players at both levels have only gotten bigger stronger faster over the decades. So how far back would we have to go to see a great modern college football team be able to consistently beat NFL teams? 80s? 70s?

I think all-time great college teams from recent seasons (like 2018 Clemson, 2019 LSU, 2020 Bama) would handle any Super Bowl champion from Lombardi’s Packers to at least the ‘85 Bears.

It’s not just about size, speed, and strength - which are significantly in favor of college teams vs. ‘70s and ‘80s NFL competition. Football schemes are light years ahead of where they were decades ago. A modern college staff would coach circles around Lombardi, Landry, Noll, etc., in an actual matchup. No disrespect at all to those coaches. It’s just the evolution of a hyper competitive sport.

There used to be a game played annually between a college All-Star team and the NFL/Super Bowl champions. The college guys were competitive and even won a few games in spite of being thrown together with only seniors - many of whom played in offenses like the wishbone and didn’t have much time to gel.

In the last five years the game was played (early/mid ‘70s) the Super Bowl champion never scored more than 24 pts. The 1972 Dolphins only scored 14 pts. You think a collection of early ‘70s college players with all-star game prep could hold Burrow, Chase, and Jefferson to 14 pts.? frick no.
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 8:31 am
Posted by Godzilla jr
Member since Sep 2025
351 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:15 am to
Okay Jimmy the Greek
Posted by weagle1999
Member since May 2025
3255 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 11:57 am to
Are today’s flag football college teams playing with the rules of whatever past era they are visiting?

If so, they wouldn’t beat any pro teams.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55065 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

Are today’s flag football college teams playing with the rules of whatever past era they are visiting? If so, they wouldn’t beat any pro teams.


Those offenses would be like voodoo to pros who never seen them… remember how much our population has grown. That’s a big factor in comparing eras’ talent levels
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 6:16 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
39477 posts
Posted on 6/16/26 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

remember how much our population has grown. That’s a big factor in comparing eras’ talent levels


There's a NFHS graph of High School sports participation through the decades:

1973: Approximately - 1 million boys played HS football
2003: Approximately - 1 million boys played HS football
2018: Approximately - 1 million boys played HS football

1993 had the same participation level as 1970 , around 930,000.

LINK

Football has always weeded out the casual athletes... Either football do yes or football do no...as Miyagi would say. Kids have more options today...%s have actually gone down.
This post was edited on 6/16/26 at 7:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram