- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cincinnati Bengals beat writer, Joe Goodberry has meltdown on X watching the Chiefs lose
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:15 am to Kansas City King
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:15 am to Kansas City King
Then burrow fanboy meltdowns have been glorious
0
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:20 am to Kansas City King
Chiefs looked like the smart team, protecting/resting players in advance of playoffs. Nothing owed to Bengals.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:25 am to gdzgft28
quote:
Don’t see the words “bengals fan” in that post.
Which Super Bowl loss were you referring to?
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:25 am to weptiger
quote:
Chiefs looked like the smart team, protecting/resting players in advance of playoffs. Nothing owed to Bengals.
Exactly.
Bengals fans should blame their front office, defense and coach for the shite start and missing the playoffs.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:30 am to TackySweater
quote:
Which Super Bowl loss were you referring to?
The one you brag about constantly…
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:35 am to gdzgft28
quote:
The one you brag about constantly…
I wouldn’t call pointing out facts, bragging. But then I’m reminded that you’re a teenager, so I guess I understand the confusion lol
And you’re saying I’m a bengals fan then? Lol
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:37 am to TackySweater
quote:
I wouldn’t call pointing out facts, bragging. But then I’m reminded that you’re a teenager, so I guess I understand the confusion lol
Oh… yeah… like you pointing out that the Chiefs purposely avoided the bengals…
And you sure do invest a lot of time in that one fact to have no vested interest in the bengals. Like a lot. Kinda pathetic someone who isn’t even a fan.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:41 am to gdzgft28
quote:
And you sure do invest a lot of time in that one fact to have no vested interest in the bengals. Like a lot. Kinda pathetic someone who isn’t even a fan.
Not at all. Just like to point the fact out when people seem to forget. It’s pretty easy to do. Takes about 60 seconds lol
quote:
like you pointing out that the Chiefs purposely avoided the bengals…
They obviously did lol. Doesn’t mean they’re scared of them though. Maybe someday you’ll understand the difference.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:45 am to TackySweater
quote:
Not at all. Just like to point the fact out when people seem to forget. It’s pretty easy to do. Takes about 60 seconds lol
Sure... that's why you defend every other team with such vigor. That's why you brought up the fact that the Broncos have beaten the Chiefs "in a meaningful game" more recently than the bengals, so the idea that the Chiefs would avoid a 9-8 team that they've beaten the last 3 times is absurd. Wait... you didn't..
But instead you said:
quote:
They obviously did lol. Doesn’t mean they’re scared of them though. Maybe someday you’ll understand the difference..
..
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 6:47 am
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:49 am to gdzgft28
They could have won that game if they wanted to and kept the broncos out. It’s obvious that they did not want to win lol
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:51 am to TackySweater
quote:
They could have won that game if they wanted to and kept the broncos out.
I thought you didn't entertain fantasies?
Like I said... your schtick is old... youre just a troll. Not even a sports fan...
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:53 am to gdzgft28
quote:
thought you didn't entertain fantasies?
You’re right. Maybe they wouldn’t have one.
Fact: they didn’t play a roster that maximized their chances of winning.
Smart move on their part.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:54 am to TackySweater
Why would the chiefs play their starters with home field advantage locked up? Explain
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:57 am to TackySweater
quote:
You’re right. Maybe they wouldn’t have one.
Fact: they didn’t play a roster that maximized their chances of winning.
Smart move on their part.
Fact: The game meant nothing to the Chiefs because (unlike burrow) they had already secured the top seed.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:58 am to NIH
quote:
Why would the chiefs play their starters with home field advantage locked up? Explain
He doesn't understand sports. He just likes to make dumb semantic arguments to make himself feel clever.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:00 am to NIH
quote:
Why would the chiefs play their starters with home field advantage locked up? Explain
To keep guys fresh? To WIN? To keep a divisional team out of the playoffs? Lol
It’s obvious they took what they perceived to be the easier path to the SB though. And that’s ok to admit lol
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:00 am to Kansas City King
Here's the problem, KC fans.
Yesterday was the first time ever, in the history of the NFL, that a team has chosen to bench a bunch of its starters the week before the playoffs.
Yesterday was the first time ever, in the history of the NFL, that a team has chosen to bench a bunch of its starters the week before the playoffs.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:06 am to TackySweater
How often do teams with home field advantage locked up play starters in the final week?
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:08 am to NIH
Always. Every damn time.
Except yesterday. The Coward Chiefs broke tradition and made a mockery of the NFL.
Except yesterday. The Coward Chiefs broke tradition and made a mockery of the NFL.
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:08 am to Kansas City King
That guy definitely posts here 
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News