- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CFP Director: No talks of expanding CFB Playoff field, debates good for college football
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:52 pm to rbdallas
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:52 pm to rbdallas
quote:
However, once upon a time , 2 teams from the SEC played in the NC game.
They were put there by opinions. Oklahoma State should have played LSU for that *championship, not Alabama.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:53 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
No talks of expanding CFB Playoff field,
I’m happy about this. Just wish they’d cut the shite and say it’s because there aren’t many playoff worthy teams.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:53 pm to CelticDog
quote:
great thing about 4 is if you go undefeated in a P5 conference, you get in.
quote:
Nd undefeated.
P12 undefeated
Sec undefeated
B12 undefeated
Acc undefeated.
Ya still think so?
Easy enough. Notre Dame isn't in a P5.
Pac-12
SEC
Big 12
ACC
Problem solved.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 1:59 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
I can't wrap my head around the thought process these morons who don't want an expanded playoff.
the only reason I hear them give is they don't want to lessen the importance of the regular season....which is stupid. You'd probably have more teams willing to schedule better OOC games with an expanded field, making the regular season better. Cupcake weekends are an abomination.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:03 pm to BilJ
quote:
the only reason I hear them give is they don't want to lessen the importance of the regular season....which is stupid.
If you give auto bids to conference champs, you instantly increase the importance of the regular season.
I've said it before, but ultimately you should let the conferences decide how they want to select their champion for the field of 8. Let the committee/computers pick the remaining 3 spots. Throw a bone to G5 schools if they're a conference champ and ranked in the Top 8 they're automatically in.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:06 pm to slackster
quote:
If you give auto bids to conference champs
then the conferences should also end divisional play. The big 10 east vs west is a joke.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:10 pm to BilJ
quote:
then the conferences should also end divisional play.
I don't understand why they haven't looked into this.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:12 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Easy enough. Notre Dame isn't in a P5.
Pac-12
SEC
Big 12
ACC
Problem solved.
He should've said:
Pac 12
Big 10
Big 12
SEC
ACC
All undefeated, who gets in?
All one loss conference champions, who gets in?
They system is far from perfect.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:13 pm to KosmoCramer
The only team with a legit gripe is Georgia, and they have two losses. Four has been enough every year.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:24 pm to rintintin
quote:
He should've said:
Pac 12
Big 10
Big 12
SEC
ACC
All undefeated, who gets in?
All one loss conference champions, who gets in?
If that ever happens, we're in no worse shape than we are now.
quote:
They system is far from perfect.
I never said it was. I was just addressing his question.
My system gets rid of divisions, takes P5 champs, and whoever is highest in the computers from everyone else, including Notre Dame.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:24 pm to MidnightVibe
Reading comprehension not your strong suit guy?
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 2:25 pm
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:25 pm to xiv
quote:
The only team with a legit gripe is Georgia, and they have two losses. Four has been enough every year.
They shouldn’t have gotten skull fricked by LSU then.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 2:31 pm to AllBamaDoesIsWin
The system is broken because you are using subjective factors to determine a champion.
How can there be so called "Power 5" conferences yet you want to determine a champion by 4 teams playing in a playoff?
How can anyone claim Michigan is the "#1 defense" all season yet they gain their ranking by playing shitty Big10 offenses? Oklahoma is the "#1 offense" but they play shitty Big 12 defenses yet we want to crown them as the best?
9 conference games. No conferences champ games. 8 teams in playoff. Power 5 conference winners get in with 3 at large bids. Much more rational.
How can there be so called "Power 5" conferences yet you want to determine a champion by 4 teams playing in a playoff?
How can anyone claim Michigan is the "#1 defense" all season yet they gain their ranking by playing shitty Big10 offenses? Oklahoma is the "#1 offense" but they play shitty Big 12 defenses yet we want to crown them as the best?
9 conference games. No conferences champ games. 8 teams in playoff. Power 5 conference winners get in with 3 at large bids. Much more rational.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 6:44 pm to 4quartaBamaball
quote:
No conferences champ games.
So we go to tiebreakers then? That'd be weird in conference where nearly half the teams don't play each other.
Posted on 12/3/18 at 6:49 pm to Bench McElroy
Debates good?
SOooooo nothing has really changed in the 100 years of the sport.
We're still always going to debate who was the real champion forever and ever.
Gotcha committee chairman.
SOooooo nothing has really changed in the 100 years of the sport.
We're still always going to debate who was the real champion forever and ever.
Gotcha committee chairman.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News