- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can the NCAA just get rid of its BS targeting rule?
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:07 pm
Its easily the most abused and moscalled rule out there and the fact it fricken carrys over to the next game is an even bigger load of crap. Then you have how the SEC is pretty much totally abusing the rule to benefit Bama and it's about time to ditch it and re write it.
Where the frick was there helmet to helmet
Where the frick was there helmet to helmet
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:09 pm to TigersHuskers
Don't forget that you have a t-sip as the head of replay in the SEC...so naturally A&M is flagged almost 200% more for targeting than any other SEC team, most of which are flags AFTER REVIEW.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:13 pm to TigersHuskers
Agreed 100%. At the VERY LEAST make it take 2 for an ejection, like unsportsmanlike.
ETA: this isn't just about Devin White. I've even groaned at a few that have gone against our opponent because they're ruining the game.
ETA: this isn't just about Devin White. I've even groaned at a few that have gone against our opponent because they're ruining the game.
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:15 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:14 pm to TigersHuskers
Ejecting players for the next game is the dumbest shite ever.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:14 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
To be fair y’all were pretty undisciplined under sumlin
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:15 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Yeah A&M has gotten some bullshite ones this year for sure, I just assume at this point Donovan Wilson is getting one if he's playing.
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:16 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:15 pm to TigersHuskers
Anything to help bama
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:16 pm to TigersHuskers
There was a game today - I think the Indiana game.
The Indiana player went low to make a clean knee wrap tackle.
At the last minute, the opposing receiver dipped his head so low it was below his knees...the receivers helmet collided with the DB's helmet and the refs called targeting, reviewed it and ejected the player.
I honestly don't know what defenders can do these days.
The Indiana player went low to make a clean knee wrap tackle.
At the last minute, the opposing receiver dipped his head so low it was below his knees...the receivers helmet collided with the DB's helmet and the refs called targeting, reviewed it and ejected the player.
I honestly don't know what defenders can do these days.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:16 pm to TigerBait2008
I can't stand the rule.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:20 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
To be fair y’all were pretty undisciplined under sumlin
We've been called for targeting more this season than in 2015-2017 combined.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:31 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
God damn don’t make me agree with an Aggie dammit.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:38 pm to TH03
You'd never see a call like that against bama before a big game.
Just sayin
Just sayin
This post was edited on 10/20/18 at 11:41 pm
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:40 pm to TigersHuskers
For an ejectable offense, there is WAY too much inconsistency with the call.
The fact that a 2nd half call carries over into the next game is asinine.
The fact that a 2nd half call carries over into the next game is asinine.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:41 pm to TigersHuskers
There needs to be level of targeting like the punter. You have running into the punter and roughing the punter.
The hits that are football plays that meet the targeting rule should be allowed to stay in the game.
The blatant headhunting should be an ejection. Its that simple.
The hits that are football plays that meet the targeting rule should be allowed to stay in the game.
The blatant headhunting should be an ejection. Its that simple.
Posted on 10/20/18 at 11:57 pm to TigersHuskers
The rule needs major reform. Nobody knows what the hell targeting even is anymore.
Any hard hit the flag comes out and whether or not they keep it or waive it off seems like a coin flip.
Any hard hit the flag comes out and whether or not they keep it or waive it off seems like a coin flip.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 12:23 am to TigersHuskers
There should be no ejection from the next game. With CTE, targeting and roughing the passer will never go away
This post was edited on 10/21/18 at 12:24 am
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:35 am to TigersHuskers
They almost called targeting on a Tulsa player today for colliding with one of our players while going after a fumble, but reversed it.
Probably the dumbest flag I’ve ever seen thrown regardless if it stood or not.
Probably the dumbest flag I’ve ever seen thrown regardless if it stood or not.
Posted on 10/21/18 at 1:52 am to NorthshoreTiger76
quote:
. With CTE, targeting and roughing the passer will never go away
That's all just a big cash grab - a study came out recently that showed no reason to believe football causes CTE.
Also, it really shouldn't even be relevant since concussions are pretty minor injuries - usually a week out, maybe 2. It's always the knees that are the real killers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News