Started By
Message

re: Can somebody explain to me this LHSAA thing to me?

Posted on 1/30/16 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
32673 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Publics don't want to play privates because they say privates recruit (so do publics). So now publics and privates won't play each other in playoffs for football, basketball, baseball, and softball. 12 different "state champions" in the sports now.


They already do this in TX
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
43208 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 3:38 pm to
The publics are better than the privates in Texas
Posted by double d
Amarillo by morning
Member since Jun 2004
16878 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 3:53 pm to
Played public many moons ago. Football played mainly publics since district was big and Destrehan and Lutcher were non district rival games. Baseball we always played Rummel, Shaw, Jesuit, and East Jeff outside of district (EJ won state during this time frame). Now at Hahnville they play several catholic league schools in baseball every year; how it should be.
Posted by LABred08
Dallas, Tx
Member since Feb 2011
429 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 4:07 pm to
quote:



Magnet schools don't cheat in basketball. All those players were zoned for Peabody and Scotlandville. They weren't recruited there.

ETA: Where is the sarcasm button on this thing?


Sorry, we can't recruit. Rapides Parish unlike the rest of Louisiana actually came up with a solution to this already. Rapides is Open Enrollment entering freshman year, and after that, any transfer to or from a regular or magnet school is grounds for a 1 year suspension from play. Because of that rule, all 3 Magnet High Schools in Rapides Parish (Peabody, Bolton and Pineville) are considered PUBLIC. Nobody playing in Rapides Parish right now has transferred in the last calendar year.

If the rest of the state would stop trying to skirt around the rules to give themselves an advantage and give concrete rules like Rapides, it wouldn't be an issue.

We're gonna have a fight for the 3A title this year with U High and Wossman BUT thanks for the 3A Public title next year, we're gonna run through that.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
32673 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 4:17 pm to
quote:


The publics are better than the privates in Texas


For the most part. It's because big cities like Allen for example have 5-6 middle schools and only 1 high school.
Public schools in DISD (Dallas) mostly suck at sports (other than Skyline)
This post was edited on 1/30/16 at 4:18 pm
Posted by bknight00
East of the Rockies
Member since Aug 2007
524 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 4:45 pm to
The main issue I have is this. Private Schools can maintain their size because they can control their enrollment. A 2A private can maintain its 2A status because it can turn away students. Public Schools don't have that luxury. They have to admit a student that lives in their district. Secondly small rural schools have a hard time competing against these small privates that are located in places like the northshore in sites like hammond, covington,and slidell. The talent pool is far richer in a city than in a small rural community. Lastly. I equate this problem to the problems Travel ball have done to local rec leagues. These parents think their kid is special and to good to play rec and go in search of a travel team. Over time these same parents "stack" a travel team in an effort to dominate the competition. The better talent gets concentrated to one team. Private Schools do the same thing. I know first hand. My son has been "recruited" and we choose to stay at our local public school because it's a great school academically. Private school folks complain about participation trophies. But public schools argument is that privates "stack" their teams in an effort to constantly beat up on the publics and without adhering to a residency zone. Private Schools will continue to bring in talent from neighboring towns, thus making the public schools weaker. Call it what you will but it's an advantage. So if public and private have to abide by 2 different sets of rules I dont see why the privates care about competing with teams that abide by the same rules that all privates do. Let the schools that are forced to adhere to the residency zoning compete against other schools that adhere to that same rule. And same for privates.
This post was edited on 1/30/16 at 5:01 pm
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61500 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

We're gonna have a fight for the 3A title this year with U High and Wossman BUT thanks for the 3A Public title next year, we're gonna run through that.


Wossman is public.
Posted by LABred08
Dallas, Tx
Member since Feb 2011
429 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Wossman is public.


So are we...
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61500 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 5:41 pm to
Just saying you said they'd give you trouble this year then said you'd run away with it after the split. Doesn't make sense
Posted by LABred08
Dallas, Tx
Member since Feb 2011
429 posts
Posted on 1/30/16 at 5:46 pm to
They won't have what they do this year. We will. Honestly, I don't think they can beat us this year unless we were to play them in Monroe. That's the only way and since they will win district, they'll probably be the 3 seed instead of 4. Because both our and UHigh districts suck, I see us staying where we are in the power rankings as 1 and 2.

But those are the only 3 teams that can be looked at in the 3A title run this year and Wossman is a distant 3rd, and 1 and 2 are about what and what though.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram