- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:46 pm to SDVTiger
Melt.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:56 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
It's generally ordered, but it isn't uncommon for a team with less losses to sit behind a team with more.
I’m talking about at the top. But it is not worth arguing about. It is not my opinion, it’s an absolute fact. Two loss teams are historically ranked lower than 1 loss teams. You can disagree all you want, but it won’t make you less wrong.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:01 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
I’m talking about at the top. But it is not worth arguing about. It is not my opinion, it’s an absolute fact. Two loss teams are historically ranked lower than 1 loss teams. You can disagree all you want, but it won’t make you less wrong.
You can talk about whatever you want. It won't change anything I've said. I'm correct. Deal with it.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:16 pm to Hot Carl
and one of them was by a mile to Iowa
55-24
55
slaughtered by 5 loss Iowa
55-24
55
slaughtered by 5 loss Iowa
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:22 pm to Hot Carl
It's not that they had 2 losses. It's that one of those those loses was by 30+ to a 7 win Iowa team.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:29 pm to Hot Carl
Ohio State just got some sweet karma for all the shite talking they did about PSU losing two games last year.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:31 pm to Hot Carl
you are right, if Ohio State wouldve just scheduled Mercer instead of Oklahoma they would be a much better team and 100% in the playoffs despite being the exact same team.
college football is at its best when a win over Mercer is 1000x better than a loss to a top 4 team
college football is at its best when a win over Mercer is 1000x better than a loss to a top 4 team
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:31 pm to Hot Carl
quote:Why not Wisconsin?
Bama got in because Ohio State lost 2 games
Bama lost to a team that finished with 3 losses, and had no significant wins.
Wisconsin had 1 loss in the championship game to a 2-loss team.
You're up.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:34 pm to Hot Carl
Yep. We were all fooling ourselves. If auburn would have won, they would have to play GA and potentially bama twice.
No worries, bama will get beat pretty bad in the first round.
No worries, bama will get beat pretty bad in the first round.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:35 pm to sgallo3
quote:
college football is at its best when a win over Mercer is 1000x better than a loss to a top 4 team
No, it's just better when a win over Mercer is better than a 31 point lost to a 7-5 team.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:37 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
better than a 31 point lost to a 7-5 team.
so you think if oklahoma had 1 loss to Iowa they wouldnt have got in? or are you just spewing random bullshite excuses for the committee? because i can guarantee you if Ohio St only loss was 31 point loss to Iowa they would be in
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:43 pm to sgallo3
quote:
so you think if oklahoma had 1 loss to Iowa they wouldnt have got in?
Wtf are you talking about? You're whining about Alabama beating Mercer while pretending like Ohio st didn't lose by 31 points to a 5 loss team. Where does Oklahoma fit in there?
quote:
or are you just spewing random bullshite
Do you even read the shite your fingers are putting on your screen?
quote:
because i can guarantee you if Ohio St only loss was 31 point loss to Iowa they would be in
And I can guarantee you if Alabama was the sec Champion you wouldn't be bitching about Mercer. So once again, wtf are you talking about?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:26 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:
auburn won yesterday Auburn and OSU both woulda had multiple top 10 wins so not sure how they were much different
Well other than auburn not getting their shite pushed in by a 7-5 team
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:30 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
4 years, 16 teams, ZERO have had 2 or more losses. That’s it. Accept it and move the frick on.
I have no problem with Bama being in the playoffs, but as an LSU fan, should you really be making this particular argument?
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News