- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bama got in because Ohio State lost 2 games
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:14 pm
All the other shite you f@gs keep bitching about is just noise. Shut the frick up about it. 4 years, 16 teams, ZERO have had 2 or more losses. That’s it. Accept it and move the frick on.
16
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:15 pm to Hot Carl
Auburn would have made it with 2 losses if they won yesterday
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:15 pm to Hot Carl
Are you saying auburn wouldn’t have made it in?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:16 pm to Hot Carl
Bama board
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:17 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Bama got in because Ohio State lost 2 games
Nah. They got in because of the Iowa loss and the second half of the Wisconsin game. Without both of those, they're probably in with two losses.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:18 pm to Hot Carl
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:18 pm to Hot Carl
Should be telling that the only way to get Bama in the playoff was to argue against Ohio State’s resume than FOR Bama’s resume...which wasn’t good.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:19 pm to gobuxgo5
quote:
Are you saying auburn wouldn’t have made it in?
No. Their quality wins ould have been too much to ignore. This is why Bama made it in over Ohio State(and why Ohio State mademit over Penn State last year). It’s nothing to do with conference championships or Bama bias or any of the other nonsense. Ohio State simply lost 100% more games than Bama, and that was simply too much to overcome.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:23 pm to Hot Carl
If auburn won yesterday Auburn and OSU both woulda had multiple top 10 wins so not sure how they were much different
Your first post seemed more like Bama would be over auburn even if auburn won
Your first post seemed more like Bama would be over auburn even if auburn won
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:26 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
Should be telling that the only way to get Bama in the playoff was to argue against Ohio State’s resume than FOR Bama’s resume...which wasn’t good.
I agree. It sucks Bama is in with that shite resume. I hate it. But the fact is there weren’t 4 teams more deserving. Be pissed at Ohio State for getting their arse handed to them by Iowa. Be mad at Wisconsin for not fielding a QB who could have started at the middle school down my street. Be mad at USC for losing to the fricking pirate. Be mad that they got rid of the BCS when Clemson and Oklahoma are the clear 2 best teams. But do not blame the committee for not selecting a team that had 2 losses. That has always been unforgivable(save 2007 when everybody but Ohio State had 2losses).
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:31 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
All the other shite you f@gs keep bitching about is just noise. Shut the frick up about it. 4 years, 16 teams, ZERO have had 2 or more losses. That’s it. Accept it and move the frick on.
Bama had infinitely more losses that UCF.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:39 pm to lsusa
quote:
Bama had infinitely more losses that UCF.
Fair enough. It’s a much better argument than Ohio State over Bama. Though historically, there has been a much bigger difference between 1 and 2 losses than 0 and 1.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:44 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
DisplacedBuckeye
Well, well, well.
Guess you weren't right after all.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:45 pm to Hot Carl
quote:
Though historically, there has been a much bigger difference between 1 and 2 losses than 0 and 1.
In the playoff, or something else?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:45 pm to Hot Carl
It baffles me that this is even an argument.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:50 pm to lsusa
The bottom line: in the end, Ohio State has no one to blame but themsleves. Period! A team of this caliber had no business get our asses handed to us by Iowa. I think if we would’ve lost a close one, it would’ve mattered in the selection connittee’s eyes. Plus, with Ohio State getting in last year not winning the conference, that set a precedence and it would be difficult to justify why they would’ve have let Alabama in this year.
Additionally, the Alabama loss was only by 8 points. It’s over, we need to move on and be ready for a good USC team. I just hope the players will be motivated enough to play hard and finish with a bowl win and not wollow in self pity for not making the final four.
Additionally, the Alabama loss was only by 8 points. It’s over, we need to move on and be ready for a good USC team. I just hope the players will be motivated enough to play hard and finish with a bowl win and not wollow in self pity for not making the final four.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 12/3/17 at 3:54 pm to TideSaint
quote:
Guess you weren't right after all.
I mean, I didn't account for Hocutt being a liar.
Sorry bout it.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:11 pm to Hot Carl
Bama got in because of politics.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
In the playoff, or something else?
Playoffs, BCS, and human polls.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:43 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I mean, I didn't account for Hocutt being a liar.
Sorry bout it.
Melt
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News