- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Any USC (west) Students or Grads here?
Posted on 7/28/20 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 3:54 pm
Looking for info on how (if at all) USC responded to their student-athletes and students about the admissions scandal.
Did they even address it with them?
From searching online I can't find much of anything.
Any help is appreciated.
Did they even address it with them?
From searching online I can't find much of anything.
Any help is appreciated.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 3:56 pm to rintintin
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 4:02 pm to rintintin
Yeah they told them if Lori Loughlin was willing to pay $500,000 plus 56k in tuition each year, expect your fees and tuition to be raised. (Which they did to 60k a year.)
Posted on 7/28/20 at 4:06 pm to rintintin
What do you mean by responded? What did USC owe them insofar as information?
It did not affect scholarship athletes or cost them spots.
My son is a junion and it was pretty much the same as they told the public. They got more about the Tyndall and UCSD scandals as those really hit the University hard in the pocketbook.
It did not affect scholarship athletes or cost them spots.
My son is a junion and it was pretty much the same as they told the public. They got more about the Tyndall and UCSD scandals as those really hit the University hard in the pocketbook.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 4:14 pm to rintintin
quote:
From searching online I can't find much of anything.
That gives you your answer
They are a private school and dont care
Posted on 7/28/20 at 4:41 pm to Anaximander
quote:
What do you mean by responded? What did USC owe them insofar as information?
Considering it casts a negative light on the University of which they attend I would imagine from a "customer relations" standpoint they would say something.
quote:
My son is a junion
I'm interested to hear your take as a parent. Seems like it didn't bother you much?
This post was edited on 7/28/20 at 4:44 pm
Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:08 pm to rintintin
quote:
I'm interested to hear your take as a parent. Seems like it didn't bother you much?
It bothered me far less than the other two scandals that cost the University up to half a billion dollars.
It bothered me that a donor had pushed for Swann to be the AD. The man was a dilettante who was never there. It might not have happened with a real AD.
If anything it ENHANCED the reputation of USC though they would not admit it. Famous people who were friends with a trustee still had to pay hundreds of thousands to get their kids in.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:26 pm to Anaximander
The biggest scandals have to be the med school dean smoking crystal meth with strippers and other leaches and by far the biggest one has to be the doctor who sexually assaulted al of the Chinese women who came in for physicals.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 5:46 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:
The biggest scandals have to be the med school dean smoking crystal meth with strippers and other leaches
Amazingly this description underplays how batshit that story was
The admin also actively covered up both of those scandals. frick them and everyone that runs the school.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 6:32 pm to usc6158
The research poaching scandal was more financial and cost USC over $50 million.
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:14 pm to rintintin
I went to USC for grad school.
Compared with all of the other scandals USC has been dealing with, this was a blip on the radar.
However, I do know that some people in administration were actually giving each other high fives when the story first broke. They loved seeing USC mentioned in the same breath as Yale, Stanford, and Georgetown.
Compared with all of the other scandals USC has been dealing with, this was a blip on the radar.
However, I do know that some people in administration were actually giving each other high fives when the story first broke. They loved seeing USC mentioned in the same breath as Yale, Stanford, and Georgetown.
Back to top
6








