- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2017 NHL Playoff Thread: PENGUINS WIN THE CUP, Crosby robs Malkin of the Conn Smythe
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:43 pm to UnluckyTiger
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:43 pm to UnluckyTiger
His leg saves that if he doesn't get run.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:44 pm to GoldenGuy
Damn thats close. Idk
Im ok with the goal
Im ok with the goal
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:45 pm to GoldenGuy
Lulz what a convoluted review... Iget they were reviewing two separate issues. But c'mon
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:45 pm to GoldenGuy
Idk.
Like, he wasn't stopping that puck from ending up in the goal. But at the same time, he was interfered with, technically.
ETA: I guess part of the reason the puck went in was because it deflected off the Pittsburgh guy's skate, and he was interfering.
I think I agree with waving off the goal. But I'm not an expert
Like, he wasn't stopping that puck from ending up in the goal. But at the same time, he was interfered with, technically.
ETA: I guess part of the reason the puck went in was because it deflected off the Pittsburgh guy's skate, and he was interfering.
I think I agree with waving off the goal. But I'm not an expert
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:45 pm to Puffoluffagus
That's a good call though
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:46 pm to sms151t
--
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:47 pm to UnluckyTiger
They didn't overturn a review. It was a initial review to see a kick.
They called interference
They called interference
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:47 pm to sms151t
Ah I missed it, I was heading to the living room.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:47 pm to sms151t
Just seems like if they're going to review something, they should review everything the first time.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:48 pm to UnluckyTiger
Game misconduct on that one 
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:48 pm to BayouBengals03
That I agree with but they do same in NFL
Review then challenge something else
Review then challenge something else
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:49 pm to sms151t
This team's inability to score is mind numbing.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:49 pm to sms151t
quote:
They didn't overturn a review. It was a initial review to see a kick.
It was a review to see if the puck went in. Caps challenged for goaltender interference, which it was.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:49 pm to Puffoluffagus
Lol oh man.
This is a crazy game.
This is a crazy game.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:50 pm to UnluckyTiger
This series just got nasty and mean I think
The goalies may need PTSD counseling after tonight also.
The goalies may need PTSD counseling after tonight also.
This post was edited on 5/1/17 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:50 pm to sms151t
Pens will probably blame Eller for that last hit.
Posted on 5/1/17 at 7:50 pm to sms151t
quote:
That I agree with but they do same in NFL
Review then challenge something else
Well in the NFL they challenge a particular part of the play. Under 2 minutes, they review everything.
Seems like if the review is initiated by the officials, they should review everything. I agree that if a team challenges a play, then you should only review the specific part of the play that they are challenging.
Popular
Back to top



1



