Started By
Message

re: 2016 Non-GS Tennis Thread

Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:22 am to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I mean, it's not golf where the 150th ranked guy can beat a top 15 ranked player on any given day, but it's also not like a top 300 guy playing you or me when they would double-bagel us.
Did you play in d1 college?

Cause if not, number 300 is double bageling your arse
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Did you play in d1 college?

Cause if not, number 300 is double bageling your arse


That's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.

And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

That's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.

And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state
Gotcha. And yes you are right, it is the little things that cant even really be seen.


If me and Federer hit baseline to baseline, or wet through drills together someone isnt going to see much difference honestly. People that dont know tennis would see ZERO difference.


However, it is the 1000 of little things that add up.


Same thing if you take an avg college player and run him through batting practice and infield drills, someone who doesnt know baseball wouldnt notice much difference between them and a Derek Jeter
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 12:50 pm
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66703 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:02 pm to
The levels of the sport never cease to amaze me. Stevie Johnson is one of the GOAT college players and is chilling at 31 in the world. Throwing out a guy like McEnroe who I think spent a year or two at Stanford, the best that college players have ever become are Todd Martin or Isner.

I think when I was a high school senior, the two kids who played in the State of Michigan high school finals at one singles lost first round at Kalamazoo USTA nationals.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 1:04 pm
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8469 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:38 pm to
Even the difference between a high school player and a USTA junior player is very significant. My daughter is an 8th grader and would double bagle the vast majority of varsity high school players. I agree with lsupride that it's not as easy to tell the difference when just watching 2 people hit ground strokes back and forth but when you play a match the differences become very apparent.
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Even the difference between a high school player and a USTA junior player is very significant


Completely depends on what state you play in, and the quality of the high school. I can't speak to Louisiana, but I know that in some other states there are some very high quality varsity teams, with very solid players. I played both USTA and high school, and there would be some schools we played that it wasn't even a contest, but then there were others that would have 10+ future D1 players on their team.

Completely agree with the groundstrokes comment from both you and lsupride. You wouldn't be able to really tell the difference between people I've been able to double bagel, and then tell the difference between people who have been able to double bagel me. Especially because the serve is such an important part of the game.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Completely depends on what state you play in, and the quality of the high school. I can't speak to Louisiana, but I know that in some other states there are some very high quality varsity teams, with very solid players. I played both USTA and high school, and there would be some schools we played that it wasn't even a contest, but then there were others that would have 10+ future D1 players on their team.
It really just depends. There is some high schools in Georgia that are loaded. There was also a time MUS in Memphis had a future ranked college player playing like 3 doubles



My favorite story though is my coach from LSU, had 3 future top 50 players in the WORLD on his Gainseville(FL) High team
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Dawgsontop34
How old are you?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

I think when I was a high school senior, the two kids who played in the State of Michigan high school finals at one singles lost first round at Kalamazoo USTA nationals
Hey, losing first round at Kalamazoo aint no joke. Tim Smychek lost first round......Now he did come back to win 7 matches in 5 days to win the back draw
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8469 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:06 pm to
We live in Orange County, CA. There are lots of very good high school tennis teams but still a lot of schools don't have a single USTA player on their team (I'm talking about kids who play 20+ open level tournaments a year not a kid who signed up for the USTA and played a couple of satellite tournaments.)

Eta some elite junior players dont even play high school tennis due to the lower level of play

Eta some schools are loaded though. The high school my daughter will attend has one of the top players from Huntington Beach, the top player from Anaheim, a couple of players from Long Beach. All tournament players.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 3:18 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45618 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

How old are you?




25.


quote:

little billy


Completely agree with pretty much everything you said there.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 3:31 pm
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
45618 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 1:48 pm to
Man, Isner's groundstrokes are so bad. It's hilarious watching any point he gets into with Murray that's longer than 3 shots.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66703 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 1:59 pm to
The guy's career is so fascinating. I saw something a few months ago about how his year could have been way better or worse based on like ten points. Having every match go into breakers is crazy.
Posted by bayoucracka
Member since Sep 2015
6898 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 3:10 pm to
That score...

Is Murray > Joker at this very second?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108528 posts
Posted on 10/28/16 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

25.
Likely a little young for us to have crossed paths. The georgia boys I ran with were Motes, Roebuck, Smith and the like
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:22 am to
quote:

hat's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.

And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state


I didn't -- and couldn't have -- played D1. I was a solid HS player, though in a relatively weak state for the sport. But there was a guy from my school better than me. Not much better mind you -- I took plenty of sets off him -- but better over the long haul. I think he ended up playing 5 or 6 at Davidson...and that would have been at his very best.

I could have played small school level college tennis. Instead, I went to UT, where the #6 guy prolly would have bageled me with ankle weights on.

I played a lot during an internship semester against this guy who was #1 on the team that won NCAA Division 2 or 3. I never beat that guy. We probably played 20 sets. I did come really close in two of those sets, but he was probably just coasting.

Anyway, roundabout point. There are a lot of "levels" in tennis. And a guy two levels above you will bagel you in 15 minutes. It's quite fascinating, really.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:23 am to
quote:

Man, Isner's groundstrokes are so bad. It's hilarious watching any point he gets into with Murray that's longer than 3 shots.


He can crack a forehand when he doesn't have to move to it.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:24 am to
quote:

The levels of the sport never cease to amaze me. Stevie Johnson is one of the GOAT college players and is chilling at 31 in the world. Throwing out a guy like McEnroe who I think spent a year or two at Stanford, the best that college players have ever become are Todd Martin or Isner.



Mac played only one year at Stanford. He won the NCAAs and said "funk it I'm out". Smart move.

James Blake was better than Todd Martin or Isner. Just saying.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:30 am to
quote:

can't figure out if it's impressive what Del Potro has been able to do, or sad that everyone outside of the elite players has been passed up by a guy with 1.5 wrists who was out for almost 3 years. Maybe both?


I vote impressive by Del Potro. That guy is just really really good at the game. The cannonball forehand definitely wins him a lot of points, but his touch is amazing as well. I've been really impressed by the steady improvement he's made on the backhand side since he's been back. He's still not hitting over it, but he's developed a sneaky awesome slice on that side. He sticks it deep in that corner every. single. time. Kind of lulls his opponent to sleep and then POW with the forehand.

Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:35 am to
quote:

rue, that was wrong. I should have said 200 or 300, and "could" instead of "would". But, my point was that whatever difference there is between those players that causes blowout scorelines is very difficult to distinguish if you watch them independently.


True. There's virtually no discernible difference between #1 and #401 on the practice court. But there's definitely a difference in their respective tax brackets.
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram