- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2016 Non-GS Tennis Thread
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:22 am to Dawgsontop34
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:22 am to Dawgsontop34
quote:Did you play in d1 college?
I mean, it's not golf where the 150th ranked guy can beat a top 15 ranked player on any given day, but it's also not like a top 300 guy playing you or me when they would double-bagel us.
Cause if not, number 300 is double bageling your arse
Posted on 10/27/16 at 11:34 am to lsupride87
quote:
Did you play in d1 college?
Cause if not, number 300 is double bageling your arse
That's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.
And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state
Posted on 10/27/16 at 12:49 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:Gotcha. And yes you are right, it is the little things that cant even really be seen.
That's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.
And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state
If me and Federer hit baseline to baseline, or wet through drills together someone isnt going to see much difference honestly. People that dont know tennis would see ZERO difference.
However, it is the 1000 of little things that add up.
Same thing if you take an avg college player and run him through batting practice and infield drills, someone who doesnt know baseball wouldnt notice much difference between them and a Derek Jeter
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:02 pm to lsupride87
The levels of the sport never cease to amaze me. Stevie Johnson is one of the GOAT college players and is chilling at 31 in the world. Throwing out a guy like McEnroe who I think spent a year or two at Stanford, the best that college players have ever become are Todd Martin or Isner.
I think when I was a high school senior, the two kids who played in the State of Michigan high school finals at one singles lost first round at Kalamazoo USTA nationals.

I think when I was a high school senior, the two kids who played in the State of Michigan high school finals at one singles lost first round at Kalamazoo USTA nationals.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 10/27/16 at 1:38 pm to Bunk Moreland
Even the difference between a high school player and a USTA junior player is very significant. My daughter is an 8th grader and would double bagle the vast majority of varsity high school players. I agree with lsupride that it's not as easy to tell the difference when just watching 2 people hit ground strokes back and forth but when you play a match the differences become very apparent.
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:25 pm to little billy
quote:
Even the difference between a high school player and a USTA junior player is very significant
Completely depends on what state you play in, and the quality of the high school. I can't speak to Louisiana, but I know that in some other states there are some very high quality varsity teams, with very solid players. I played both USTA and high school, and there would be some schools we played that it wasn't even a contest, but then there were others that would have 10+ future D1 players on their team.
Completely agree with the groundstrokes comment from both you and lsupride. You wouldn't be able to really tell the difference between people I've been able to double bagel, and then tell the difference between people who have been able to double bagel me. Especially because the serve is such an important part of the game.
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:28 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:It really just depends. There is some high schools in Georgia that are loaded. There was also a time MUS in Memphis had a future ranked college player playing like 3 doubles
Completely depends on what state you play in, and the quality of the high school. I can't speak to Louisiana, but I know that in some other states there are some very high quality varsity teams, with very solid players. I played both USTA and high school, and there would be some schools we played that it wasn't even a contest, but then there were others that would have 10+ future D1 players on their team.
My favorite story though is my coach from LSU, had 3 future top 50 players in the WORLD on his Gainseville(FL) High team
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:30 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:How old are you?
Dawgsontop34
Posted on 10/27/16 at 2:33 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:Hey, losing first round at Kalamazoo aint no joke. Tim Smychek lost first round......Now he did come back to win 7 matches in 5 days to win the back draw
I think when I was a high school senior, the two kids who played in the State of Michigan high school finals at one singles lost first round at Kalamazoo USTA nationals
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:06 pm to Dawgsontop34
We live in Orange County, CA. There are lots of very good high school tennis teams but still a lot of schools don't have a single USTA player on their team (I'm talking about kids who play 20+ open level tournaments a year not a kid who signed up for the USTA and played a couple of satellite tournaments.)
Eta some elite junior players dont even play high school tennis due to the lower level of play
Eta some schools are loaded though. The high school my daughter will attend has one of the top players from Huntington Beach, the top player from Anaheim, a couple of players from Long Beach. All tournament players.
Eta some elite junior players dont even play high school tennis due to the lower level of play
Eta some schools are loaded though. The high school my daughter will attend has one of the top players from Huntington Beach, the top player from Anaheim, a couple of players from Long Beach. All tournament players.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 10/27/16 at 3:29 pm to lsupride87
quote:
How old are you?
25.
quote:
little billy
Completely agree with pretty much everything you said there.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 10/28/16 at 1:48 pm to Dawgsontop34
Man, Isner's groundstrokes are so bad. It's hilarious watching any point he gets into with Murray that's longer than 3 shots.
Posted on 10/28/16 at 1:59 pm to Dawgsontop34
The guy's career is so fascinating. I saw something a few months ago about how his year could have been way better or worse based on like ten points. Having every match go into breakers is crazy.
Posted on 10/28/16 at 3:10 pm to Bunk Moreland
That score...
Is Murray > Joker at this very second?
Is Murray > Joker at this very second?
Posted on 10/28/16 at 3:11 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:Likely a little young for us to have crossed paths. The georgia boys I ran with were Motes, Roebuck, Smith and the like
25.
This post was edited on 10/28/16 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:22 am to Dawgsontop34
quote:
hat's what I was saying. I may have phrased that poorly, but I was trying to say that a top 300 player would double bagel me. I was trying to use two extremes to show that a top 15 guy beating 150ish is somewhere in the middle of that.
And I didn't play in college, but I've beaten D1 players (and lost to many others). I know I'm still not good enough to take a game off a top 300 guy, especially in my current state
I didn't -- and couldn't have -- played D1. I was a solid HS player, though in a relatively weak state for the sport. But there was a guy from my school better than me. Not much better mind you -- I took plenty of sets off him -- but better over the long haul. I think he ended up playing 5 or 6 at Davidson...and that would have been at his very best.
I could have played small school level college tennis. Instead, I went to UT, where the #6 guy prolly would have bageled me with ankle weights on.
I played a lot during an internship semester against this guy who was #1 on the team that won NCAA Division 2 or 3. I never beat that guy. We probably played 20 sets. I did come really close in two of those sets, but he was probably just coasting.
Anyway, roundabout point. There are a lot of "levels" in tennis. And a guy two levels above you will bagel you in 15 minutes. It's quite fascinating, really.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:23 am to Dawgsontop34
quote:
Man, Isner's groundstrokes are so bad. It's hilarious watching any point he gets into with Murray that's longer than 3 shots.
He can crack a forehand when he doesn't have to move to it.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:24 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
The levels of the sport never cease to amaze me. Stevie Johnson is one of the GOAT college players and is chilling at 31 in the world. Throwing out a guy like McEnroe who I think spent a year or two at Stanford, the best that college players have ever become are Todd Martin or Isner.
Mac played only one year at Stanford. He won the NCAAs and said "funk it I'm out". Smart move.
James Blake was better than Todd Martin or Isner. Just saying.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:30 am to bayoucracka
quote:
can't figure out if it's impressive what Del Potro has been able to do, or sad that everyone outside of the elite players has been passed up by a guy with 1.5 wrists who was out for almost 3 years. Maybe both?
I vote impressive by Del Potro. That guy is just really really good at the game. The cannonball forehand definitely wins him a lot of points, but his touch is amazing as well. I've been really impressed by the steady improvement he's made on the backhand side since he's been back. He's still not hitting over it, but he's developed a sneaky awesome slice on that side. He sticks it deep in that corner every. single. time. Kind of lulls his opponent to sleep and then POW with the forehand.
Posted on 11/3/16 at 1:35 am to bayoucracka
quote:
rue, that was wrong. I should have said 200 or 300, and "could" instead of "would". But, my point was that whatever difference there is between those players that causes blowout scorelines is very difficult to distinguish if you watch them independently.
True. There's virtually no discernible difference between #1 and #401 on the practice court. But there's definitely a difference in their respective tax brackets.
Back to top



1




