- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:13 pm to Rebel
quote:
this was never a society question. because we all know that is someting entirely different.
Right
And I'm the moron that can't read

Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:25 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
Only later did he start saying um. high INCOME minus EXPENSES x an extended period of time.
And even then, that doesn't make a person upper class it makes them rich.
THERE IS NO DEBATE HERE. what is wrong with you people? income classes are clearly defined and affect your taxes.
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:26 pm to rmcc316
He's a stubborn bastard
Don't even bother
Don't even bother

Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:33 pm to Lithium
quote:
When is this thread going to die
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:43 pm to Powerman
I think it was concluded, quite convincingly, that you can't define a person's class based solely on salary...so the second question in the original post cannot properly be answered.
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:44 pm to Chicken
If you're talking about social class you're right
If you're talking about economic class then you're not right
Obviously income isn't the only factor that goes into building wealth but it's the most important factor. You can only get so rich without a high income.
If you're talking about economic class then you're not right
Obviously income isn't the only factor that goes into building wealth but it's the most important factor. You can only get so rich without a high income.
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:51 pm to Powerman
In Louisiana alone, I'd say anything 100k and higher is considered upper class.
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:56 pm to BS
Well that would definitely put you in upper middle at worst. Maybe a little bit higher to be in the top 5% though
Posted on 3/30/07 at 1:59 pm to Powerman
You morons are confusing income distribution with class.

Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:00 pm to Chicken
hey cock sucker, sticky my TD.com tourney thread
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:00 pm to Chicken
quote:
You morons are confusing income distribution with class.
pretty much
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:00 pm to Chicken
quote:
You morons are confusing income distribution with class.
does this help?
Bill Gates can buy the entire state of Georgia. However, he can never really be a member at Augusta.
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:01 pm to Chicken
quote:
You morons are confusing income distribution with class.
And you can't read
The first post asked specifically about salary so we attempted to answer the question as it pertains to that
People can be divided into economic classes just as well as they can be divided into social class
You're thinking of "classy" to mean class while we're talking about economic class.
And since we're morons for confusing income distribution with class, wouldn't that also make you a moron when you tried to come up with a dollar figure yourself?
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:03 pm to Rebel
quote:
Bill Gates can buy the entire state of Georgia. However, he can never really be a member at Augusta.
We understand this
It's a societal thing that you're born into
That's social class
The question at hand was asking about economic class
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:04 pm to Powerman
quote:
The question at hand was asking about economic class
economic classes really don't have hard-set distinctions, however
that's the problem
Posted on 3/30/07 at 2:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Right but it's safe to assume that if you're in the top .5% of wage earners, you're not in the middle class.
Popular
Back to top
