I envision it in the mid single digits if they get EPA approval and shooting up as they sign deals with customers. I suppose that they could have demand issues as clients aren't ready to purchase large volumes of graphene, yet, and that could be another stall in the price.

Like I said, I think they are priming their future customer base by getting them to test with the supply that they have right now, so when they produce in bulk, the customers will be ready.

ETA - I think the end point for this stock is it either dwindles to zero, goes to $100+, or, is a acquisition target.

The third scenario could be the most likely, and probably the one that pisses us off the most, because we'll know that the process/product was real and we were this close to hitting the mother load.

This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 5:57 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Longer Tail Tiger

Member since Dec 2019

301 posts

Posted on 12/3/25 at 3:14 pm to Longer Tail Tiger

The earliest similar language relative to the EPA compliance I've found is in Management's Discussion and Analysis for the full year that ended on September 30, 2022. It's quoted below with a link to its source.

"EPA Review
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires most nano materials to be reviewed to ensure no impact to people and the environment. This is a requirement for all producers in the USA and for all
graphene products used in the USA regardless of where the product was produced. The Company is working closely with the EPA to ensure risks are mitigated and expect EPA clearance in calendar year 2023
but cannot guarantee timing or quantify any potential financial impact of any EPA or other regulatory requirements."
LINK

I couldn't find any information as to, if or when any document(s) was filed with the EPA; but it seems apparent the Company has been seeking EPA clearance since at least September 30, 2022, if not earlier.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by supadave3

Houston, TX

Member since Dec 2005

31765 posts

Posted on 12/3/25 at 8:10 pm to Longer Tail Tiger

quote:
but it seems apparent the Company has been seeking EPA clearance since at least September 30, 2022, if not earlier

Well that’s not encouraging…

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Longer Tail Tiger

Member since Dec 2019

301 posts

Posted on 12/3/25 at 10:41 pm to supadave3

In my opinion, the apparent lengthiness of the process to gain EPA approval is probably typical of overly burdensome, and sometimes nonsensible, governmental rules and regulations, which reflect poorly in regard to the process and the EPA itself, especially in this set of circumstances with respect to the quality of HGRAF's graphene, Hydrograph as an entity seeking approval, and more specifically its detonation process which, if I'm not mistaken, appears to have been going on safely for about a decade, without any adverse events or effects relating to people or the environment. All of the foregoing, of course, is solely to the best of my very limited knowledge and understanding and my being prone to frequently err in such matters.

This post was edited on 12/3/25 at 10:53 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Hangit

The Green Swamp

Member since Aug 2014

45293 posts

Posted on 12/4/25 at 6:55 am to supadave3

quote:
Well that’s not encouraging

Whoever was making decisions for President Autopen tried to squash anything that had any relationship to the petrochemical industry. Small explosions of acetylene spit in the face of the green grift. Knowing nothing of the process, from start to finish, was detrimental to progress.